In: Accounting
Question 2 [100 marks]
In Jasmine Ltd’s production cost centre, two units are produced: Unit Aand Unit B, the total overhead cost being €1000. This is made up of two costs:
Machine set-up costs of €800; and
Inspection costs of €200.
Overhead is absorbed on the basis of direct labour hours. The total direct labour hours (DLH) amount to 200 DLH.
Unit A requires 150 DLH; and
Unit B 50 DLH.
The machinery for Unit A only needs to be set-up once whereas Unit Brequires nine set-ups. Unit A and Unit B both require two inspections each.
Required
a) Calculate the overhead recovery charge that should be made to each product, based on:
Absorption costing method based on Direct Labour Hours.
[20 marks]
The ABC method based on machine set-up costs and inspection costs.
[50 marks]
b) Show the comparison of each method and write a short note explaining
why the difference occurs.
[30 marks]
Hey champ, here's your answer:
1. Overhead recovery charge that should be made to each product,
based on:
Absorption costing method based on Direct Labour Hours.
The total overhead cost: | ||||
1 | Machine setup cost | € 800 | ||
2 | Inspection cost | € 200 | ||
Total overhead cost | € 1,000 | |||
Total direct labour hours = | 200 DLH | |||
Thus, Overhead absorption rate is | ||||
€ 1,000 | / 200 DLH | |||
= | € 5 per DLH | |||
We've got absorption rate, now we just have to muntiply the activity hours with absorption rate to calculate overhead recovery | ||||
UNIT | DIRECT LABOUR HOURS | Abs Rate | Overhead recovery | |
A | 150 | € 5 | € 750 | |
B | 50 | € 5 | € 250 |
2. In ABC method of costing we do not recover overhead based on one blanket rate of overhead, instead overhead is recovered based on activity level. Thus overhead related to machine set-up is recovered based on number of machine setups in the both the units and so on. Thus,
Overhead cost related to machine setup | ||||
€ 800 | ||||
Total No. of Machine setups in unit A & unit B= | ||||
10 set-ups | ( 1 setup for A + 9 Setup for B) | |||
Thus, overhead absorption rate= | ||||
800 / 10= | 80 per set ups | |||
In the same way | ||||
Overhead cost related to Inspection | ||||
€ 200 | ||||
Total No. of Inspection in unit A & unit B= | ||||
4 Inspection | ( 2 Inspection for A + 2 Inspection for B) | |||
Thus, overhead absorption rate= | ||||
200 / 4= | 50 per Inspection | |||
We've got absorption rate, now we just have to muntiply the activity hours with absorption rate to calculate overhead recovery | ||||
UNIT | No of machine setup | Abs Rate | Overhead recovery | |
A | 1 | € 80 | € 80 | |
B | 9 | € 80 | € 720 | |
€ 800 | ||||
UNIT | No of inspections | Abs Rate | Overhead recovery | |
A | 2 | € 50 | € 100 | |
B | 2 | € 50 | € 100 | |
€ 200 | ||||
Thus total overhead recovered | ||||
Units | Machining Activity | Inspection activity | Total | |
A | € 80 | € 100 | € 180 | |
B | € 720 | € 100 | € 820 |
3. Summary of overhead recovery based on different methods:
Method | Overhead recovered | |
DLH | Unit A | € 750 |
Unit B | € 250 | |
ABC | Unit A | € 180 |
Unit B | € 820 | |
Thus, as seen above overhead recovery based on DLH does not give credit to unit A for less use of machine set ups.