Question

Scenario # 2 : Chicken International Group

You are the CEO of a chicken-processing company. The Vice President of marketing informs you that if you label your chicken as “free range” you can charge 20% more and greatly improve profit margins.

You find out that all that needs to be done to legally use the term “free range” is to open the door to the hen house for 5 minutes a day. This provides the chickens with access to the outdoors when, in fact, very few chickens will wander out when the door is open for 5 minutes. Moreover, the term “free range” may be used regardless of space per chicken, number of chickens, or amount of time spent outside.

700 word minimum

1. What is the ethical dilemma or issue?

2. Identify and discuss at least 3 alternatives (options) that the company could consider. For each option
indicate if it is legal and ethical, probably legal, but unethical, or illegal, and unethical.

3 What are your recommendations? In other words, of the several alternatives you identified, what do you think the company should do?

4 What is your rationale for your recommendations? In other words, why do you recommend this course of action?

Answer 1

1

For this situation, the Vice President of Marketing is a case of avarice and a 20% net revenue is a ravenous offer that lies before you. It is exceptionally obvious that we have to expand the expense while the expense of the items in the market is rising. Be that as it may, how? In this ethical dilemma, we need to address how to build the expense of the chicken without being voracious while as yet acting lawfully and ethically. The issue in here is that is 5 minutes of opening enclosure time is sufficient to mark the chicken's unfenced chickens? On the off chance that we let the chickens be out for a more drawn out time, it will cost more cash to work the homestead in that manner. In the event that we don't, we would lie buyers by marking our item's unfenced..

The essential ethical dilemma for this situation is among Morals and Laws. The law says that a chicken can be named as unfenced under a specific circumstance yet ethically the essential necessities of considering a chicken as unfenced doesn't get satisfy. For instance getting a copy mark sheet printed will legitimately give you a degree yet ethically the imprint sheet is imprinted in an off-base way.

2

Rather than opening pens for a more drawn out time of period we can change office structure. Existing windows size can be supplanted by a more extensive size, so it is large enough that new outside air can be effortlessly ventilated through the entire pen office. Another option is customary poultry cultivating, where no pens exist within the office. In that manner, chickens have more space to stroll around. The conventional cultivating likewise made drinking water funnels and food supplies a lot higher, so chickens need to bounce and invest more energy to arrive at their food. My last option would keep chickens in the office at evening time and let them out to a shut farmstead during the daytime. This shift has incredible preferences for the organization, ranchers, and shoppers.

3

I imagine that the chickens ought to be raised unfenced in light of the fact that they are normally more advantageous. They are allowed the chance to act like chickens and are given satisfactory daylight which is fundamental for legitimate development. Free-extending gives a bigger and increasingly shifted condition for the chickens. Additionally, letting the chickens have unfenced is savvy. They eat bugs, grasses, seeds, leaves and different treats they find outside. They can scratch and delve in the earth to discover bugs and leaves and to search for different things to eat. They can run and exercise their wings by flying short separations. They can rest in the sun or locate a decent spot to clean up which is fundamental in controlling parasites and molding their skin. Being free-extended, chickens can create more excellent eggs.

4

The company should work ethically and ethically right which would assist it with growing. Beguiling and deluding things and data given to the client may help in acquiring a sound benefit the company, however this may stop when people in general would lose trust in the nature of the item. As indicated by me, I suggest such an answer on the grounds that a company doesn't remain on the benefit of a little span; rather it remains on reality and conviction of the clients. When the clients begin to confront trust issues, it would get inconceivable for the company to benefit even the negligible benefit.

PLZ LIKE MY ANSWER