In: Economics
I. You have studied the chapters on unemployment and business cycles. Please review those chapters before you answer this question
a) Find the time series data (quarterly or monthly) on the unemployment rate, inflation rate and real GDP growth in the U.S. from 1980 to 2005, and discuss whether the Okun’s Law is valid or not. Then, discuss whether the Phillips curve exists in the U.S. economy( you have to report your data source and or the website).
b) Which recession is most severe in terms of its depth and the duration of unemployment?
c) Why unemployment rises when the economic is recovering? what kinds of unemployment is it ?
II. Monetary policy will have different impact on the equilibrium rate of interest and GDP. Try to draw three different IS curves with different slopes and show
a) The different impact of the same easy money policy on interest rate and GDP in these different IS curves
b) Monetary policy is most effective under what conditions ( which IS curve). Why ?
c) What determine the slopes of IS curve. Review chapter 14 on sticky price and flexible price model to answer the percentage distribution of both types of firms ,i.e. s vs ( 1-s) under different IS curves( hint : refer to the equations on. P. 408 and p. 411 that
P=EP+{( 1-s)/a/s} ( ( Y-Y bar) p. 408 Y= Y bar + alpha ( P-EP). P. 411
Year | Growth | Unemployment | Inflation | Business Cycle |
---|---|---|---|---|
1929 | NA | 3.2% | 0.6% | Aug peak and Oct. market crash |
1930 | -8.5% | 8.7% | -6.4% | Contraction |
1931 | -6.4% | 15.9% | -9.3% | Contraction |
1932 | -12.9% | 23.6% | -10.3% | Contraction |
1933 | -1.2% | 24.9% | 0.8% | New Deal and March trough |
1934 | 10.8% | 21.7% | 1.5% | Expansion |
1935 | 8.9% | 20.1% | 3% | Expansion |
1936 | 12.9% | 16.9% | 1.4% | Expansion |
1937 | 5.1% | 14.3% | 2.9% | May peak |
1938 | -3.3% | 19% | -2.8% | June trough |
1939 | 8% | 17.2% | 0% | Expansion and Dust Bowl ended |
1940 | 8.8% | 14.6% | 0.7% | |
1941 | 17.7% | 9.9% | 9.9% | Expansion and WWII |
1942 | 18.9% | 4.7% | 9% | Expansion |
1943 | 17% | 1.9% | 3% | Expansion |
1944 | 8% | 1.2% | 2.3% | Bretton-Woods |
1945 | -1% | 1.9% | 2.2% | Feb. peak, recession, Oct. trough |
1946 | -11.6% | 3.9% | 18.1% | Expansion and Fed cuts |
1947 | -1.1% | 3.9% | 8.8% | Marshall Plan and Cold War |
1948 | 4.1% | 4% | 3% | Nov. peak |
1949 | -0.6% | 6.6% | -2.1% | Oct. trough and NATO |
1950 | 8.7% | 4.3% | 5.9% | Expansion and Korean War |
1951 | 8% | 3.1% | 6% | Expansion |
1952 | 4.1% | 2.7% | 0.8% | Expansion |
1953 | 4.7% | 4.5% | 0.7% | War ended and July peak |
1954 | -0.6% | 5% | -0.7% | May trough, Dow at 1929 level |
1955 | 7.1% | 4.2% | 0.4% | Expansion |
1956 | 2.1% | 4.2% | 3% | Expansion |
1957 | 2.1% | 5.2% | 2.9% | Aug peak |
1958 | -0.7% | 6.2% | 1.8% | April trough |
1959 | 6.9% | 5.3% | 1.7% | Fed raised rates |
1960 | 2.6% | 6.6% | 1.4% | April peak and Fed cut |
1961 | 2.6% | 6% | 0.7% | JFK spending and Feb. trough |
1962 | 6.1% | 5.5% | 1.3% | Cuban Missile Crisis |
1963 | 4.4% | 5.5% | 1.6% | LBJ spending, Fed raised rate |
1964 | 5.8% | 5% | 1% | Fed raised rate |
1965 | 6.5% | 4% | 1.9% | Vietnam War, Fed raised rate |
1966 | 6.6% | 3.8% | 3.5% | Expansion, Fed raised rate |
1967 | 2.7% | 3.8% | 3% | Expansion |
1968 | 4.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | Fed raised rate |
1969 | 3.1% | 3.5% | 6.2% | Nixon, Fed raised rate, Dec. peak |
1970 | 0.2% | 6.1% | 5.6% | Nov. trough, Fed cut rate |
1971 | 3.3% | 6% | 3.3% | Expansion and Wage-price controls |
1972 | 5.3% | 5.2% | 3.4% | Expansion |
1973 | 5.6% | 4.9% | 8.7% | Vietnam War and gold standard ended, Nov. peak. |
1974 | -0.5% | 7.2% | 12.3% | Stagflation, Watergate, Fed raised rate |
1975 | -0.2% | 8.2% | 6.9% | March trough, Fed cut rate |
1976 | 5.4% | 7.8% | 4.9% | Expansion, Fed cut rate |
1977 | 4.6% | 6.4% | 6.7% | Carter |
1978 | 5.5% | 6% | 9% | Fed raised rate |
1979 | 3.2% | 6% | 13.3% | Fed raised then lowered rate |
1980 | -0.3% | 7.2% | 12.5% | Jan. peak, Fed raised rate, July trough |
1981 | 2.5% | 8.5% | 8.9% | Reagan, Expansion peaked in July |
1982 | -1.8% | 10.8% | 3.8% | Nov. trough, Fed cut rate |
1983 | 4.6% | 8.3% | 3.8% | Reagan spent on defense |
1984 | 7.2% | 7.3% | 3.9% | Expansion |
1985 | 4.2% | 7% | 3.8% | Expansion |
1986 | 3.5% | 6.6% | 1.1% | Reagan cut taxes |
1987 | 3.5% | 5.7% | 4.4% | Black Monday |
1988 | 4.2% | 5.3% | 4.4% | Expansion, Fed raised rate |
1989 | 3.7% | 5.4% | 4.6% | S&L Crisis |
1990 | 1.9% | 6.3% | 6.1% | July peak |
1991 | -0.1% | 7.3% | 3.1% | March trough |
1992 | 3.5% | 7.4% | 2.9% | Expansion, Fed cut rate |
1993 | 2.8% | 6.5% | 2.7% | Expansion |
1994 | 4% | 5.5% | 2.7% | Expansion |
1995 | 2.7% | 5.6% | 2.5% | Fed raised rate |
1996 | 3.8% | 5.4% | 3.3% | Fed cut rate |
1997 | 4.4% | 4.7% | 1.7% | Fed raised rate |
1998 | 4.5% | 4.4% | 1.6% | LTCM crisis |
1999 | 4.8% | 4% | 2.7% | Expansion |
2000 | 4.1% | 3.9% | 3.4% | Expansion |
2001 | 1% | 5.7% | 1.6% | March peak, 9/11, and Nov. trough |
2002 | 1.7% | 6% | 2.4% | Expansion |
2003 | 2.9% | 5.7% | 1.9% | JGTRRA |
2004 | 3.8% | 5.4% | 3.3% | Expansion |
2005 | 3.5% | 4.9% | 3.4% | Expansion |
2006 | 2.7% | 4.4% | 2.5% | Expansion |
I.
a) Okun's Law provides a statistical relationship between the percentage change in Real GDP and the Unemployment. Employed workers help to produce goods and services and unemployed workers do not, increase in the unemployment rate should be associated with decreases in real GDP. This negative relationship between Unemployment and GDP is called Okun's Law.
From the websites US Department of Commerce and US Department of Labor, one can obtain the data source for the Percentage change in Labor Force and Percentage change in Real GDP. Plotting the latter on the Y-Axis and the former on the X-axis and drawing scatter plot shows the negative correlation between these variables. Increases in Unemployment tend to be associated with lower than normal growth in Real GDP. This gives the following relation as
Percentage change in Real GDP = 3.5% - 2*Change in the Unemployment Rate
Phillip's Curve explains the trade off between the Inflation rate and Unemployment rate.
The above figure shows a typical Phillip's Curve which is fitted for the US data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This proves that Phillip's Curve exist in the short run.
b)The Great Recession of 2007-2009 is considered to be most severe in terms of its depth and unemployment rate. According to the Department of Labor, roughly 8.7 million jobs (about 7%) were shed from February 2008 to February 2010, and real GDP contracted by 4.2% between Q4 2007 and Q2 2009. In a two year span, the unemployment rate increased from 5% to 10% .
c) One of the stages of business cycle which follows a recession is an Economic Recovery. The economy would have incurred great losses from the recession period. To make up that, the companys and other firms would have to lay off and sack workers when they start to work again. Also, many firms would have shut down during the recession and it might be difficult for them to start once again soon after the recovery period starts. This type of unemployment is called Cyclical unemployment.
II.
Figure a has a relatively flatter IS Curve (IS1), Figure b has a less flatter IS Curve (IS2) and figure 3 has an inelastic IS Curve (IS3). With an expansionary monetary policy, with a relatively flatter curve (IS1), increase in output is more. Increase from Y1 to Y3 is greater than the increase from Y1 to Y2. Also, the fall in interest rate is less with a relatively flatter IS curve. Fall from r1 to r2 is less than the fall from r1 to r3.
b) Thus monetary policy is effective when the IS curve is more elastic or more flatter because the flatter the IS Curve, more will be the increase in GDP and less will be the fall in interest rate with an expansionary monetary policy.
c) The slope of the IS Curve is determined by the value of the multiplier and the investment response to interest rate. IS Curve equation can be given as
Y = KA - K(a1)i and corresponsingly slope can be given as
Change in i/Change in Y = -1/(K.a1), where K is the keynesian multiplier and a1 is the investment response to interest rate. Thus, greater the values of the multiplier or the investement response to interest rate, flatter will be the IS curve and alternatively with lower values, steeper will be the IS Curve.