Question

In: Economics

Assume markets are perfectly competitive. By means of carefully drawn graphs, illustrate the costs and benefits...

Assume markets are perfectly competitive. By means of carefully drawn graphs, illustrate the costs and benefits of: (1) a tariff for the importing country; (2) an export subsidy; and (3) an import quota. How do the welfare effects of voluntary export restraints compare with tariff and quotas policies?

Solutions

Expert Solution

(1) Effect of a tariff for the importing country (figure 1)

In figure 1, D and S represents the demand and supply curve of the commodity. If free trade is conducted, the price of the commodity would be Pw. At this price, Qws is the quantity of the good supplied and Qwd is the quantity of good demanded. When a tariff is imposed, the price of the commodity in the importing country increases from Pw to Pt (by the amount of tariff imposed). The quantity supplied increases from Qws to Qts and the amount of quantity demanded falls from Qwd to Qtd.

Consumer surplus = area above the price line and below the demand curve

producer surplus = area below the price line and above the demand curve

The overall impact of tariff can be summarized as follows:

Fall in consumer surplus = -(A+B+C+D)

increase in producer surplus = A

rise in government revenue = C

Net effect on welfare of the importing country = -(B+D)

figure 1

(2) effect of an export subsidy (figure 2)

In figure 2, D and S represents the demand and supply curve of the commodity. If free trade is conducted, the price of the commodity would be Pw. At this price, Qws is the quantity of the good supplied and Qwd is the quantity of good demanded. When an export subsidy is provided, it raises the prices that suppliers get in an exporting country. The price increaes by the amount of the subsidy, from Pw to Ps. At this price, the quantity supplied increases from Qws to Qss and the amount of quantity demanded falls from Qwd to Qsd.

Consumer surplus = area above the price line and below the demand curve

producer surplus = area below the price line and above the demand curve

The overall impact of subsidy can be summarized as follows:

Fall in consumer surplus = -(A+B)

increase in producer surplus = A+B+C

fall in government revenue = -(B+C+D)

Net effect on welfare of the exporting country = -(B+D)

figure 2

(3) effect of import quota (figure 3)

Import quota basically restricts the amount of a commodity the one country purchases from the other country. Import quota raise the price of the good that is being imported. When imports are restricted, it leads to an excess demand at the initial price level. This causes the price to build up in order for the market to clear.

In figure 3, D1 and S1 represents the demand and supply curve of the commodity. If free trade is conducted, the price of the commodity would be Pw. At this price, Qws is the quantity of the good supplied and Qwd is the quantity of good demanded. When an import quota is imposed, the price of the commodity in the importing country increases from Pw to Pw+q (by the amount of tariff imposed). The quantity supplied increases from Qws to Qs and the amount of quantity demanded falls from Qwd to Qd. There would be the same impact, if instead of quota, a tariff of t = Pw+q - Pw was imposed.

Consumer surplus = area above the price line and below the demand curve

producer surplus = area below the price line and above the demand curve

The overall impact of quota can be summarized as follows:

Fall in consumer surplus = -(A+B+C+D)

increase in producer surplus = A

quota rent = C

Net effect on welfare of the importing country = -(B+D)

figure 3

Voluntary export restraints (VER) is a quota on trade that is imposed on the exporting country's side instead of the importing country's side. From the importing country's point of view, VER is exactly like an import quota but the difference is that the quota rents are now earned by the foreign country. So the area C that we observed in figure 3 is now captured by the exporters of the foreign country.

So, under VER the net effect on the importing country becomes = -(B+C+D) which suggests that VER is always costly to the importing country as compared to quota and tariff (which have a net welfare effect of -(B+D). This is the difference in the welfare effects of voluntary export restraints to that of tariff and quotas policies.

Please drop a thumbs up if you found this answer helpful. Thanks!


Related Solutions

a. With aid of a diagram, carefully illustrate the private and social benefits and costs to...
a. With aid of a diagram, carefully illustrate the private and social benefits and costs to education. Demonstrate that as more years of education are acquired the expected gains from education tends to increase for private individual but falls for the society as a whole. (Note: Indicate the differences in the educational preferences from the perspectives of the society and private person). b. From (a) above, suggest some policy recommendations to governments in the developing world. c. Discuss the following...
1. Who benefits from a perfectly competitive market? Who wants perfectly competitive markets, and who does...
1. Who benefits from a perfectly competitive market? Who wants perfectly competitive markets, and who does not want perfectly competitive markets? Why? 2. If your firm is in a competitive market, what can you choose? 3. In managing or creating a firm, would you rather operate in a competitive market or a monopoly? Why? 4. Is a monopoly a good or a bad thing for society? Why
Beginning at a normal profit position, use graphs to Illustrate how the perfectly competitive firm's revenues...
Beginning at a normal profit position, use graphs to Illustrate how the perfectly competitive firm's revenues and profit position can be altered due to a change in the industry equilibrium. Graph a change from the zero economic profit position ( normal profit position) to a loss and from the zero economic position to an economic profit - use 2 separate graphs
Assume that the gold-mining industry is perfectly competitive. a) Illustrate a long-run equilibrium using diagrams for...
Assume that the gold-mining industry is perfectly competitive. a) Illustrate a long-run equilibrium using diagrams for the gold market and for a representative gold mine. b) Suppose that an increase in jewelry demand induces a surge in the demand for gold. Using your diagrams, show what happens in the short run to the gold market and to each existing gold mine. c) If the demand for gold remains high, what would happen to the price over time? Specifically, would the...
why are there no perfectly competitive markets in the world today?
why are there no perfectly competitive markets in the world today?
What are the important characteristics of perfectly competitive markets? Give me 5 examples of perfectly competitive...
What are the important characteristics of perfectly competitive markets? Give me 5 examples of perfectly competitive markets. Why do you think economist really like to talk about competitive markets? What does the concept of low or no barriers to entry mean? Why is it so important to understand barriers to entry? Give me 5 examples of price takers in perfectly competitive markets.
Compare and contrast perfectly competitive markets with monopolistically competitive markets. Which is more realistic and why?
Compare and contrast perfectly competitive markets with monopolistically competitive markets. Which is more realistic and why?
ABLE #1 represents data for a perfectly competitive firm (assume labor drives the variable costs). Assume...
ABLE #1 represents data for a perfectly competitive firm (assume labor drives the variable costs). Assume the product sells for $75.00 (and filling out the table with the correct answers for 10 points): Laborers Quantity TFC TVC TC ATC AVC AFC MC MR TR Total Econ Profit 1 5 2 12 3 21 4 31 5 40 $12.50 6 48 7 54 $3,150.00 8 57 a. On the same sheet of paper you are submitting to the Week Eight Big...
Argue against or for Perfectly Competitive markets-provide a rationale
Argue against or for Perfectly Competitive markets-provide a rationale
Monopolistic competitive markets are said to be less economically efficient than perfectly competitive markets. Explain why...
Monopolistic competitive markets are said to be less economically efficient than perfectly competitive markets. Explain why this is true. Diagram the equivalent long-run equilibrium points for each to demonstrate your answer.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT