Question

In: Economics

Consider the hypothetical example using game theory. Assume that it is a one-off simultaneous move game,...

Consider the hypothetical example using game theory. Assume that it is a one-off simultaneous move game, and that each player only cares about their own payoff.

LG and Samsung are deciding whether or not to release a new 360-degree camera.

If both LG and Samsung release the camera, then LG will make $20 million profit, and Samsung will make $40 million profit.

If LG releases the camera, and Samsung does not, then LG will make $30 million profit and Samsung will make $0 profit.

If LG does not release the camera, and Samsung does, then LG will make $30 million profit, and Samsung will make $60 million profit.

If neither LG nor Samsung release the camera, they both receive $0 profit

a) Depict the above outcomes in a payoff matrix

b) If LG releases the camera, what is Samsung’s best response?

c) Does LG have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.

d) Does Samsung have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.

e) Find the Nash Equilibrium of the game.

f) Explain why the Nash Equilibrium is a likely outcome for this game.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a) The payoff matrix would be,

Samsung Samsung
Release Do not release
LG Release

$20 million,

$40 million

$30 million,

$0 million

LG Do not release

$30 million,

$60 million

$0 million,

$0 million

b) If LG chooses to release the camera, Samsung will also choose to release the camera as it will have a higher payoff of $40 million by doing so.

c) If Samsung chooses to release the camera, LG would choose to not release the camera and if Samsung chooses not to release the camera, LG would choose to release the camera. Thus, we can see that LG does not have a dominant strategy.

d) If LG chooses to release the camera, Samsung would choose to release the camera and if LG  chooses not to release the camera, Samsung would again choose to release the camera. Thus, we can see that Samsung has a dominant strategy of releasing the camera.

e) We know that irrespective of LG’s decision, Samsung will always choose to release the camera. Now, when Samsung chooses to release the camera, LG would choose not to release the camera. Hence, we can see that the Nash Equilibrium is (Do not release, Release), which means that LG will choose not to release the camera and Samsung would choose to release the camera. By doing so, payoff for LG would be $30 million and the payoff for Samsung would be $60 million.

f) Nash Equilibrium is the likely outcome for this game, as no company would like to deviate from these strategies unless the other company does so. Secondly, both the companies are getting the maximum possible payoffs by using these strategies.

IF YOU FIND THESE ANSWERS HELPFUL, PLEASE UP VOTE.


Related Solutions

Below is the pay-off matrix for a one-shot, simultaneous move game with two players/firms, Firm 1...
Below is the pay-off matrix for a one-shot, simultaneous move game with two players/firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2. They are both in the apple market. Each can chose to go for the high end of the market (high quality) or the low end of the market (low quality). The payoffs are profits in thousands of dollars. Each firm has two strategies: low and high.    Firm2 Low High Low -$20, -$30 $100,$800 Firm High $900,$600 $50,$50 Using the above...
Suppose you are given the following one-shot, simultaneous-move game:                               &nbsp
Suppose you are given the following one-shot, simultaneous-move game:                                      BP and Exxon are deciding whether or not to charge a high price or a low price for       gasoline sales tomorrow. The two firms cannot collude, and both will post their prices tomorrow at the same time. This game has the following payoff matrix (profits for the day are in parentheses):                                                                                     Exxon High Price Low Price High Price ($800, $800) (-$300, $1,200) Low Price ($1,200, -$300) ($500,...
Consider the following information for a simultaneous move game: If you advertise and your rival advertises,...
Consider the following information for a simultaneous move game: If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn $5 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn $15 million and the non-advertising firm will earn $1 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for 10 (ten) years, then the...
. Consider a simultaneous move game between a teachers’ union and a university. Each agent can...
. Consider a simultaneous move game between a teachers’ union and a university. Each agent can bargain hard (H) or accommodate (A). If both the parties bargain hard (H,H), each would gain nothing. If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a benefit of $1 million while the bargaining party gets a $5 million, while if they both accommodate (A,A), they each get $3 million in benefit. a. Draw the bargaining game in normal form (a matrix). b....
Consider a simultaneous move game between a plumbers’ union and a school. Each agent can bargain...
Consider a simultaneous move game between a plumbers’ union and a school. Each agent can bargain hard (H) or accommodate (A). If both the parties bargain hard (H,H), each would gain nothing. If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a benefit of $11 million while the bargaining party gets a $55 million, while if they both accommodate (A,A), they each get $33 million in benefit. a. Draw the bargaining game in normal form (a matrix). b. Does...
Use the following payoff matrix for a simultaneous-move one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player...
Use the following payoff matrix for a simultaneous-move one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player 2 Strategy C D E F Player 1 A 25,15 4,20 16,14 28,12 B 10,10 5,15 8,6 18,13 a. What is player 1’s optimal strategy? Why? b. Determine player 1’s equilibrium payoff.
Can there be more than one equilibria in a simultaneous game? Explain and/or give na example...
Can there be more than one equilibria in a simultaneous game? Explain and/or give na example of why or why not?
In a two-player, one-shot simultaneous-move game each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If...
In a two-player, one-shot simultaneous-move game each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $17. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $27. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $62 and player 2 earns $11. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $11 and player...
Consider now the following two-player simultaneous-move game, called the rock-paper-scissors-lizard game. R stands for rock, P...
Consider now the following two-player simultaneous-move game, called the rock-paper-scissors-lizard game. R stands for rock, P for paper, S for scissors, and L for lizard. R beats S but loses against P and L; P beats R but loses against S and L; S beats P and L but loses against R; L beats R and P but loses against S. The payoffs for winning is 1 and that for losing is -1; when both players choose the same strategy...
Question 1 - Game Theory (7 Marks) Alice and Bob are playing a game of simultaneous...
Question 1 - Game Theory Alice and Bob are playing a game of simultaneous moves where they are deciding which concert they will attend on Saturday night. Two musicians are performing that night locally, Artist 1 and Artist 2. Alice prefers to go to Artist 1 with Bob rather than Artist 2 with Bob, and she prefers going to Artist 2 with Bob rather than going to Artist 2 alone. Moreover, she prefers going to Artist 1 alone rather than...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT