FIRST QUESTION-
- undoubtedly the demand for the product would decline with a
huge margin.the same would apply for the competitors producing on
the same level and basis of production.
- company would have to
decline the price to sell the produced and available stock
to recover the money invested in it.
- profit margin would decline
- there may be some
intervention from the health department which may impact the
goodwill and the image of the company adversely
- the above stated are the possible outcome concerned with the
demand and situation faced by the company in short run.
SECOND QUESTION-
- the first step undertaken by the company must be the cross
verification of the allegation and challenges made in the
documentary and verify the truthiness of the report.
- it should quickly adapt a better way of production of good
which is harmless for users.for example- organic elements
used,production without harmless contents etc.
- the features should be highlighted in the general public
through various mode of advertisement ,example-
exhibition,print media and electronic media,
- experimental challenges- there should be invitation to health
agency which can come and try the product and prove whether the
product is harmless or not.this step would increase the confidence
of consumer and increase the market share.
- price can be increased
up to certain level considering the competition level,price
elasticity of demand etc. consumers are often ready to pay more for
better quality goods.
to rebuilt the image may take some time but if above
steps and proper marketing techniques are undertaken then in long
run the company can recover all the losses and additional costs and
can get the increased profitability and market share side by
side.