Proof that the violation of the Kelvin-Planck statement leads to the violation of the Clausius statement.

Expert Solution

assume that Kelvin-Planck statement is incorrect.

Consider a cyclically working device 1, which absorbs energy Q1 as heat from a thermal reservoir at TH. Equivalent amount of work W(W=Q1) is performed.

Consider another device 2 operating as a cycle, which absorbs energy QL as heat from a low temperature thermal reservoir at TL and rejects energy QH (QH=QL+W). Such a device does not violate Clausius statement.

If the two devices are now combined, the combined device (enclosed by the dotted boundary) transfers heat QL from the low temperature reservoir at TL to a high temperature reservoir at TH with out receiving any aid from an external agent, which is the violation of the Clausius statement.

Likewise let us assume that the Clausius statement is incorrect. So we have a device 1, cyclically working transferring heat Q from a low temperature reservoir at TL to a high temperature thermal reservoir at TH . Consider another device 2, which absorbs heat Q1 from a high temperature reservoir at TH does work W and rejects energy Q as heat tot the low temperature reservoir at TL as shown in figure.

If the two devices are combined (shown in figure by a dotted enclosure), then the combined device receives energy (Q1-Q) as heat from a thermal reservoir and delivers equivalent work (W=Q1-Q) in violation of the Kelvin-Planck statement.

Therefore violation of Clausius statement leads to the violation of the Kelvin-Planck statement. Hence, these two statements are equivalent.

genius_generous answered 1 year ago

Prove the equivalence of Kelvin-Planck and Clausius statements.

The clausius statement of the second law denies the possiblity of transferring energy by heat from...

The clausius statement of the second law denies the possiblity of transferring energy by heat from a cooler to a hotter body. I think it true because the statement says that " no process is possible in which the sole result of it would be the transfer of heat from a cooler to a hotter body" However, the textboox solution says otherwise. can somebody explain

Investment Theory: For each of the following, indicate whether the statement is a violation of the...

Investment Theory: For each of the following, indicate whether the statement is a violation of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis and, if so, of which form. Explain why. Your answers should be short and concise. 1. Stocks before large dividend increases have consistently positive abnormal returns. The dividend increase is publicly announced. 2. Company A announced its intention to hire Mr. X, a well-known specialist in the industry. Its stock price gradually rose over the two weeks following the announcement. 3....

Provide a proof of the following statement: For all integers ? and ?, if ? +...

Provide a proof of the following statement: For all integers ? and ?, if ? + ? is odd, then ? − ? is odd.

Is the statement " an increase in labour supply leads to a reduction in real wage"...

Is the statement " an increase in labour supply leads to a reduction in real wage" true? Explain

In this exercise we outline a proof of the following statement, which we will be taking...

In this exercise we outline a proof of the following statement, which we will be taking for granted in our proof of the division theorem: If a, b ∈ Z with b > 0, the set S = {a − bq : q ∈ Z and a − bq ≥ 0} has a least element. (a) Prove the claim in the case 0 ∈ S. (b) Prove the claim in the case 0 ∈/ S and a > 0. (0...

Which of the following integer examples provides a proof of the existential statement "∃n ∈ ℤ,...

Which of the following integer examples provides a proof of the existential statement "∃n ∈ ℤ, n² ≤ 0 ∧ n ≥ 0"? a n = -1 b n = 1 c n = 0 d n = 10

Use proof by contrapositive to prove the statement: For all real numbers, if m + n...

Use proof by contrapositive to prove the statement: For all real numbers, if m + n is irrational, then m or n is irrational.

Determine if the statement below is True or False. Justify your answer by giving a proof...

Determine if the statement below is True or False. Justify your answer by giving a proof or counterexample. Let A,B,C∈Mn×n(R) . Suppose C is invertible and C=AB. Then the columns of A, B and C are each bases for Rn and B is the change of basis matrix from the columns of C to the columns of A.

Window dressing leads to creating bad loans if not discovered by the lender. Explain this statement...

Window dressing leads to creating bad loans if not discovered by the lender. Explain this statement using what you learned in the course.

Question