In: Economics
Evaluate a Statement
In a world of zero transportation costs, no trade barriers, and significant differences between nations with regard to factor conditions, firms must expand internationally if they are to survive. Discuss this statement.
The theory of comparative advantage is a measure of profit
gained from trade practices to an individual and nation. It
suggests that the activities in the countries must be so efficient
that can produce effective factors of production. If there were
zero transportation costs, no trade barriers, and nontrivial
differences between nations regarding factor conditions, then firms
are said to provide the best set of factors of production.
As factor endowments evolve, the firm may want to disperse its
value-creating activities to those markets that offer comparative
advantages. If the firm is in a competitive market, this provides
global exposure to establish new business operations. A firm may be
able to survive in a local market without international expansion,
if the local market is not targeted by competitors that have taken
advantage of the economies offered by dispersing their
value-creation activities internationally. An example is an
inefficient, high-priced locallyowned supermarket that has not yet
faced the entry of Wal-Mart in its market.
When assuming location economies, a firm develops internationally
its value creation activities, so that it can take advantage of
different factors in different countries. The location of value
creation activities "can have one of two effects i.e., it can lower
the costs of value creation and helps to achieve a low-cost
position.
Hence, well established firms in a country can offer the greatest
set of factor conditions to produce their products, might not need
to expand internationally. A firm's value creation activities may
need to be scattered to other countries witn a comparative
advantage as factor conditions change.