In: Psychology
1. Why did almost all of the Indian subcontinent fall under the rule of Muslim overlords? Do you believe that this was inevitable? Do you see any similarity between the Muslim Conquest and the so called Aryan Conquest?
Why did both Muslims and Hindus feel deep respect for Nanak? What was the essence of his teaching?
1. the early 12th century saw the emergence of several Islamic
states which were ruled by military cadres in the Indian
subcontinent which ultimately led to a gradual expansion of a
Muslim dynasty in the Indian subcontinent. With the collapse of the
centralised Abbasid Caliphate in Central Asia, there
emerged a state of political rivalries
amongst the different nomadic warrior bands who ventured further
beyond the Ural mountains and began to raid the towns and villages
on the outer frontiers of the subcontinent. The increasing
fractions within the different princely kingdoms of India gave the
Muslim invaders an opportunity to make their incursions into the
subcontinent as they were supported by far larger armies. While
their initial political actions were marked by a practice
of plundering the defeated towns and villages, they soon
multiplied their incursions into the Indian subcontinentwith the
intention of conquering and settling in the fertile and heavily
populated river valleys and irrigated plains of west and central
India. Thus, the advent of the Muslim warlords from Central Asia
was similar in its blue print to the Aryan conquest centuries ago
as both the Muslim tribesmen and the Aryans first came as invaders
in search of booty and they both later changed their policy into
one of Settling as rightful conquerors and owners of the fertile
plains of the Gangetic and Indus basins which made the birth of
thriving civilisations and kingdoms a strong possibility.