Question

In: Economics

Suppose India and Pakistan sign a treaty requiring both countries to stop building nuclear weapons. If...

Suppose India and Pakistan sign a treaty requiring both countries to stop building nuclear weapons. If both countries abide by the treaty, India receives a payoff of 8 and Pakistan receives a payoff of 13. If India cheats on the treaty while Pakistan abides by it, India receives a payoff of 14 and Pakistan receives a payoff of zero. If Pakistan cheats on the treaty while India abides by it, Pakistan receives a payoff of 14 while India receives a payoff of zero. If both countries cheat on the treaty, India receives a payoff of 5 while Pakistan receives a payoff of 3.

  1. Draw the strategic (normal) form of the game.
  2. What is the Nash equilibrium/equilibria of the game? Will India and Pakistan abide by the agreement?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer 1

    Pakistan

Abide Cheat

India Abide    8,13 0,14

Cheat 14,0 5,3  

Answer 2

The Nash Equilibrium is : (Cheat, Cheat) = (5,3). No, Inida and Pakistan will not abide by the agreement.

Reason:

Case 1: When India cheats, while Pakistan either abides by the decision or cheats respectively

India's payoffs would be either 14 or 5 depending on whether Pakistan abides by the decision or cheats respectively. However, the payoffs of India would be lower if he had chosen the other strategy to abide by the decision (8 or 0 depending on Pakistan's strategy)

Thus, India's dominant startegy is to cheat.

Case 2: When Pakistan cheats, while India either abides by the decision or cheats respectively

Pakistan's payoffs would be either 14 or 3 depending on whether India abides by the decision or cheats respectively. However, the payoffs of Pakistan would be lower if he had chosen the other strategy to abide by the decision (13 or 0 depending on India's strategy)

Thus, Pakistan's dominant startegy is to cheat.


Related Solutions

Why the two countries India & Pakistan have fought?
Why the two countries India & Pakistan have fought?
Please discuss how/if your ideas about India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc. (the countries on the Indian subcontinent)...
Please discuss how/if your ideas about India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc. (the countries on the Indian subcontinent) have changed after learning more about the Indian Partition of 1947. Was dividing the countries by religion a good idea? Why or why not. Minimum two paragraphs.
India and China are both huge countries that have enjoyed dramatic levels of economic development in...
India and China are both huge countries that have enjoyed dramatic levels of economic development in the current age of globalization. Give two examples of how China and India’s respective economic booms are similar, and two ways they differ from one another.
Situation: Suppose there are two countries, Germany and India, and two goods, bicycles and textiles. Germany...
Situation: Suppose there are two countries, Germany and India, and two goods, bicycles and textiles. Germany has a resource endowment of 42,444,325 units of labor and 8,873,941 million units of capital, while India has a resource endowment of 475,090,729 units of labor and 10,299,894 million units of capital. Each bicycle requires 100 units of capital and 10 units of labor to produce, and each unit of textiles requires 40 units of capital and 2 units of labor to produce. Question:...
Situation: Suppose there are two countries, Germany and India, and two goods, bicycles and textiles. Germany...
Situation: Suppose there are two countries, Germany and India, and two goods, bicycles and textiles. Germany has a resource endowment of 42,444,325 units of labor and 8,873,941 million units of capital, while India has a resource endowment of 475,090,729 units of labor and 10,299,894 million units of capital. Each bicycle requires 100 units of capital and 10 units of labor to produce, and each unit of textiles requires 40 units of capital and 2 units of labor to produce. Question:...
Suppose two countries Mexico and Canada both produce two goods wheat and coffee, suppose the relative...
Suppose two countries Mexico and Canada both produce two goods wheat and coffee, suppose the relative price of wheat in Mexico is 2.5 but in Canada it is 0.5. If they both specialize based on comparative advantage and trade, what will be the range of possible global relative price of coffee that trade will converge to, providing both countries mutual gains from trade. Assuming the resource used in producing wheat and coffee is homogeneous, what will happen to the wheat...
1 suppose there are two countries of equal size, say liberia and Gambia, that both produce...
1 suppose there are two countries of equal size, say liberia and Gambia, that both produce and consume cocoa and coffee. the productive capacities and efficiencies of the countries are such that if both countries devoted all their resources to cocoa production, output would be as follows liberia: 400 tonnes Gambia: 1600 tonnes if all the resources of the countries were allocated to production of coffee, output would be liberia: 400 tonnes. Gambia: 800 tonnes statement Liberia has comparative advantage...
Compare two countries one big economy and one small economy. Suppose that both economies have the...
Compare two countries one big economy and one small economy. Suppose that both economies have the same percentage of Current account deficit to GDP ratio. a) Why do you think current account deficit be an economic problem for these countries?, b) Would it be more problematic in small or big economies? Why?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT