In: Statistics and Probability
Height | Weight | Age | Shoe Size | Waist Size | Pocket Change |
64 | 180 | 39 | 7 | 36 | 18 |
66 | 140 | 31 | 9 | 30 | 125 |
69 | 130 | 31 | 9 | 25 | 151 |
63 | 125 | 36 | 7 | 25 | 11 |
68 | 155 | 24 | 8 | 31 | 151 |
62 | 129 | 42 | 6 | 32 | 214 |
63 | 173 | 30 | 8 | 34 | 138 |
60 | 102 | 26 | 6 | 25 | 67 |
66 | 180 | 33 | 8 | 30 | 285 |
66 | 130 | 31 | 9 | 30 | 50 |
63 | 125 | 32 | 8 | 26 | 32 |
68 | 145 | 33 | 10 | 28 | 118 |
75 | 235 | 44 | 12 | 40 | 60 |
68 | 138 | 43 | 8 | 27 | 50 |
65 | 165 | 55 | 9 | 30 | 22 |
64 | 140 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 95 |
78 | 240 | 40 | 9 | 38 | 109 |
71 | 163 | 28 | 7 | 32 | 14 |
68 | 195 | 24 | 10 | 36 | 5 |
66 | 122 | 33 | 9 | 26 | 170 |
53 | 115 | 25 | 7 | 25 | 36 |
71 | 210 | 30 | 10 | 36 | 50 |
78 | 108 | 23 | 7 | 22 | 75 |
69 | 126 | 23 | 8 | 24 | 175 |
77 | 215 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 41 |
68 | 125 | 23 | 8 | 30 | 36 |
62 | 105 | 50 | 6 | 24 | 235 |
69 | 126 | 42 | 9 | 27 | 130 |
55 | 140 | 42 | 8 | 29 | 14 |
67 | 145 | 30 | 8 | 30 | 50 |
Explain the correlation coefficient of determination.
a. Height Vs. Weight with an alpha of 0.05/2
b. Weight vs age alfpha 0.01/2
c. Height vs shoe sz an alpha of =0.02/2
a ) Let's find correlation coefficient between Height ad Weight using excel.
First copy and paste the given data in excel:
Using "=CORREL(A:A,B:B)" this excel command, we get the correlation between Height and Weight as 0.534
Note that: I put "Height " and "Weight" in "A " and "B" columns of excel.
Similarly do for "Weight and age"; Height and shoe size.
See the following image.
Let's test the hypothesis of correlation coefficient.
THe null hypothesis ( H0 ) and the alternative hypothesis ( Ha ) are as follows:
Where is the notation of population correlation coefficient.
a) We find correlation coefficient between Height ad Weight ( r ) = 0.534
Degrees of freedom = n - 2 = 30 - 2 = 28
For = 0.05, the critical r ( rc ) value from pearson correlation table is 0.361
Decision rule :
1) If r > rc then we reject null hypothesis .
2) If r < rc then we fail to reject null hypothesis .
Here r = 0.534 > rc = 0.361
so we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: At 5% level of significance the data provide sufficient evidence in the favor of alternative hypothesis.
That is there is correlation between Height and Weight .
The correlation coefficient of determination between Height and Weight = 0.5342 = 0.2852
b) From the above excel output, the correlation between Weight and age ( r ) is 0.110
Degrees of freedom = 28
For = 0.01 and df = 28, the critical value of correlation coefficient ( rc ) is 0.463
Here r < rc, so we fail to reject null hypothesis at 1% level of significance.
At 5% level of significance the data does not provide sufficient evidence in the favor of alternative hypothesis.
That is there is no correlation between Weight and age.
The correlation coefficient of determination between Weight and age is 0.1102 = 0.0121
c)
From the above excel output, the correlation between Weight and Shoe Size( r ) is 0.551
Degrees of freedom = 28
For = 0.02 and df = 28, the critical value of correlation coefficient ( rc ) is 0.423
Here r > rc, so we reject null hypothesis at 2% level of significance.
Conclusion:
At 5% level of significance the data provide sufficient evidence in the favor of alternative hypothesis.
That is there is correlation between Height and Shoe Size..
The correlation coefficient of determination between Weight and age is 0.5512 = 0.3035