- Analogous estimating:
This type of estimating involves comparisons to other, similar
projects or project components. Most organizations perform projects
that are similar to other projects within the organization, or know
the costs of projects performed by other organizations. The actual
costs can be scaled on the basis of known differences to arrive at
the estimate for the new project
- Parametric estimating
This involves starting with a unit cost and scaling it up to the
number of units required. Most industries have public knowledge
banks that publish cost data, for example, the cost per square foot
to build a house in various cities. The parametric value can also
originate in-house, if many of those types of projects have been
completed.
- Rule of thumb estimating:
It is often intuitive to determine an optimistic and pessimistic
value. Three point estimating uses those values to
“skew” the estimate if there is higher upside or downside risk, or
if the estimator wishes to introduce a skew to account for risk.
The estimator chooses a Most Likely estimate (normal) as well as an
Optimistic and Pessimistic value. These can be averaged using the
triangular distribution:
Estimate = (a + M + b) / 3
Or if the intention is to keep the estimate tighter to the most
likely value, the beta distribution can be used:
Estimate = (a + 4M + b) / 6
Where:
- a = Optimistic Estimate
- M = Most Likely Estimate
- b = Pessimistic Estimate
Differnce:
1.Analog estimates:
a.If your current project is similar to past
ones.
b.Before taking, choose successful ones.
2.Parametric estimates:
a.This is more scientific method,which is
calculated by previous activities.
b.This is a quick method but needs Robust data
c. It is hard to adjust.
3. Rule of thumb estimates:
a. It is quick method to estimate because it
used breakdown structure.
b. Each task is estimates individually.
c. It is detailed work process.
d. You will receive more accurate results.