In: Math
A researcher was interested in how students’ Graduate Record Examinations scores (GREQ- Quantitative and GREV-Verbal) predict college students’ graduate school Grade Point Average (GGPA). He collects data from 30 college students. The GRE Quantitative (X1) and GRE Verbal (X2) scores can range from 400-1600 (Note. This is the old GRE score scale). GGPA (Y) can range from 0.00 to 4.00.
GREQ | GREV | GGPA |
625 | 540 | 2.16 |
575 | 680 | 3.60 |
520 | 480 | 2.00 |
545 | 520 | 2.48 |
520 | 490 | 2.88 |
655 | 535 | 3.44 |
630 | 720 | 3.68 |
500 | 500 | 2.40 |
605 | 575 | 3.76 |
555 | 690 | 2.72 |
505 | 545 | 2.96 |
540 | 515 | 2.08 |
520 | 520 | 2.48 |
585 | 710 | 2.16 |
600 | 610 | 4.00 |
625 | 540 | 2.16 |
575 | 680 | 3.60 |
520 | 480 | 2.00 |
545 | 520 | 2.48 |
520 | 490 | 2.88 |
655 | 535 | 3.44 |
630 | 720 | 3.68 |
500 | 500 | 2.40 |
605 | 575 | 3.76 |
555 | 690 | 2.72 |
505 | 545 | 2.96 |
540 | 515 | 2.08 |
520 | 520 | 2.48 |
585 | 710 | 2.16 |
600 | 610 | 4.00 |
If someone were to increase their GRE-Quantitative score by 50 points, how much would you expect his or her GPA to change, after controlling for the GRE-Verbal variability? Show how you calculated your answer. (8 p)
In your own words explain why you think that the model did not explain all of the variability in GGPA. In other words, what other factors might play a role in increasing the amount of variability explained in GGPA. (8 p)
Which of the two independent variables contributes more weight to the regression equation? In other words, which independent variable contributes more to the explanation of the dependent variable variability? Justify why you believe your answer is correct. (6 p)
Report and interpret the Pearson Correlation coefficients between GGPA & GREQ, GGPA & GREV, and GREQ & GREV. (12 p)
If someone were to increase their GRE-Quantitative score by 50 points, how much would you expect his or her GPA to change, after controlling for the GRE-Verbal variability? Show how you calculated your answer. (8 p)
The regression equation is:
Regression output | confidence interval | |||||
variables | coefficients | std. error | t (df=27) | p-value | 95% lower | 95% upper |
Intercept | -1.3216 | |||||
GREQ | 0.0056 | 0.0025 | 2.226 | .0346 | 0.0004 | 0.0108 |
GREV | 0.0017 | 0.0015 | 1.173 | .2511 | -0.0013 | 0.0048 |
Predicted values for: GGPA | |||||||
95% Confidence Interval | 95% Prediction Interval | ||||||
GREQ | GREV | Predicted | lower | upper | lower | upper | Leverage |
50 | 1 | -1.03885 | -3.45878 | 1.38108 | -3.73934 | 1.66164 | 4.076 |
The GPA would be -1.03885 by putting GREQ = 50 and GREV = 1 in the regression equation.
In your own words explain why you think that the model did not explain all of the variability in GGPA. In other words, what other factors might play a role in increasing the amount of variability explained in GGPA. (8 p)
R² | 0.294 |
Adjusted R² | 0.242 |
R | 0.542 |
Std. Error | 0.584 |
n | 30 |
k | 2 |
Dep. Var. | GGPA |
Only 29.4% of the variability is explained in CGPA. All the variability is not explained because the overall GRE score contribution is not included in the model.
Which of the two independent variables contributes more weight to the regression equation? In other words, which independent variable contributes more to the explanation of the dependent variable variability? Justify why you believe your answer is correct. (6 p)
The regression output with GREQ is:
r² | 0.258 | |||||
r | 0.508 | |||||
Std. Error | 0.588 | |||||
n | 30 | |||||
k | 1 | |||||
Dep. Var. | GGPA | |||||
ANOVA table | ||||||
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
Regression | 3.3649 | 1 | 3.3649 | 9.73 | .0042 | |
Residual | 9.6825 | 28 | 0.3458 | |||
Total | 13.0475 | 29 | ||||
Regression output | confidence interval | |||||
variables | coefficients | std. error | t (df=28) | p-value | 95% lower | 95% upper |
Intercept | -1.1076 | |||||
GREQ | 0.0070 | 0.0022 | 3.119 | .0042 | 0.0024 | 0.0116 |
Only 25.8% of the variability is explained in CGPA by GREQ.
The regression output with GREV is:
r² | 0.164 | |||||
r | 0.405 | |||||
Std. Error | 0.624 | |||||
n | 30 | |||||
k | 1 | |||||
Dep. Var. | GGPA | |||||
ANOVA table | ||||||
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
Regression | 2.1435 | 1 | 2.1435 | 5.50 | .0263 | |
Residual | 10.9040 | 28 | 0.3894 | |||
Total | 13.0475 | 29 | ||||
Regression output | confidence interval | |||||
variables | coefficients | std. error | t (df=28) | p-value | 95% lower | 95% upper |
Intercept | 0.9696 | |||||
GREV | 0.0033 | 0.0014 | 2.346 | .0263 | 0.0004 | 0.0061 |
Only 16.4% of the variability is explained in CGPA by GREV.
Therefore, GREQ contributes more weight to the regression equation.
Report and interpret the Pearson Correlation coefficients between GGPA & GREQ, GGPA & GREV, and GREQ & GREV. (12 p)
Between GGPA & GREQ Pearson Correlation coefficient is 0.508. There is a moderate positive relationship between the variables.
Between GREQ & GREV Pearson Correlation coefficient is 0.468. There is a moderate positive relationship between the variables.
Between GGPA & GREV Pearson Correlation coefficient is 0.405. There is a moderate positive relationship between the variables.