Under what circumstances if any, can the Tax Court have jurisdiction over petitioner’s overpayment of tax?...

Under what circumstances if any, can the Tax Court have jurisdiction over petitioner’s overpayment of tax? Explain how this can occur – give an example that you can see happening with a client. Is there a benefit to the Tax Court having jurisdiction over the overpayment?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The ability of the Tax Court to have jurisdiction of overpayment in refund litigation is subject to three special jurisdictional limitations. First situation is the Tax Courtmay only make such a determination after the assesse has received a statutory notice of deficiency from the IRS.

When the Tax Court gains jurisdiction over a refund litigation, it is generally for the limited purpose of determining the amount of an overpayment when there is a finding that no deficiency exists and the taxpayer made an overpayment. Jurisdiction in Tax Court may also extend to determine an overpayment of additions to tax not subject to deficiency procedures

refund jurisdiction is limited to the district courts However, the Tax Court generally has jurisdiction over deficiency litigations. In some circumstances, the Tax Court may also have jurisdiction over refund litigation as well. The advantages and disadvantages of filing a refund litigation versus a deficiency litigation should be considered, and Tax Court jurisdiction over the matter may play a role in the decision as well.

For example A client agreed to a tax deficiency following an audit but disagreed with certain additions to tax that the IRS determined to exist. As a result, the IRS issued a deficiency notice to the taxpayer and the taxpayers placed the additions to tax in controversy. Even though additions to tax are not subject to the deficiency procedures, the Tax Court was granted jurisdiction over the overpayments of additions to tax. Although the term “overpayment” has not been defined statutorily, it has been administratively interpreted to include “any interest, additions to tax or additional amount.”

BENEFITS

The main advantage to going to tax court IS WE NEED not have to pay back taxes if WE won the case
2. rules that govern evidence will be less strict and may be open than in other courts or appeals proceedings.

jeff jeffy answered 3 months ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to the jurisdiction is...

When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to the jurisdiction is via the Internent?

1. When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to a state...

1. When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to a state is via the Internet? In other words, when might there by sufficient minimum contacts to give a court jurisdiction over a remote party? For instance, Is a passive website that can be accessed from anywhere enough to establish jurisdiction or is more needed? 2. Why would a corporation prefer to be seen as ethical? To whom does a corporation owe a duty and what...

Lest the three trial courts that have jurisdiction over tax cases

1: What is the name of the court of general jurisdiction in the state of Washington?...

1: What is the name of the court of general jurisdiction in the state of Washington? 2: What is the name of the trial court in the federal system? 3: When does a lawsuit begin under Washington law? 4: Explain ADR and why do businesses prefer these methods? 5: Identify the four elements of negligence. 6: What is defamation? Name 2 types of defamation. 7: What is meant by strict liablity? In what circumstances is strict liability applied? 8: What...

Under what circumstances can an employer act unilaterally?

Briefly explain how a person can obtain proper jurisdiction in federal court?

Which court systems have jurisdiction as to each of these lawsuits – Does federal or state...

Which court systems have jurisdiction as to each of these lawsuits – Does federal or state or both federal and state courts have jurisdiction? If the state has the jurisdiction, then which state(s) has the jurisdiction? Explain your reasoning for each answer. Part 1. Pat is living in Sunnyvale. He wants to sue his next-door neighbor, Dorothy, claiming that Dorothy promised to sell him the house next door.

Question