Question

In: Math

A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back...

A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back pain. Prior to testing the patch, each of n = 4 patients rates the current level of back pain on a scale from 1 to 8. After wearing the patch for 90 minutes, a second pain rating is recorded. The data are as follows.

                                                Before        After

                                          __________________

                   G = 36                  6          2

                  G2 = 784                6          2

                ΣX2 = 192                4          4

                                                8          4

                                         ______________________

                                            T = 24   T = 12

                                          SS = 8    SS = 4

Perform an ANOVA and then analyze the data with a t-test. Use the .05 level of significance for both.

Solutions

Expert Solution

grand mean = (24+12)/8 = 4.50

SS within=SS1 + SS2 = 8+4 = 12

SS(between)= SSB = Σn( x̅ - x̅̅)² = 4(6-4.5)²+4*(3-4.5)² = 9.000 + 9.000 = 18
no. of treatment , k =   2
df between = k-1 =    1
N = Σn =   8
df within = N-k =   6
  
mean square between groups , MSB = SSB/k-1 =    18.0000
  
mean square within groups , MSW = SSW/N-k =    2.0000
  
F-stat = MSB/MSW =    9.0000

SS df MS F p-value F-critical
Between: 18.00 1 18.00 9.00 0.0240 5.99
Within: 12.00 6 2.00
Total: 30.00 7

since, p value=0.0240<α=0.05, test is significant

there is significant difference between means

======================

using paired t test

SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 difference , Di =sample1-sample2 (Di - Dbar)²
6 2 4.000 1.000
6 2 4.000 1.000
4 4 0.000 9.000
8 4 4.000 1.000
sample 1 sample 2 Di (Di - Dbar)²
sum = 24 12 12.000 12.000

mean of difference ,    D̅ =ΣDi / n =   3.000                  
                          
std dev of difference , Sd =    √ [ (Di-Dbar)²/(n-1) =    2.0000                  
                          
std error , SE = Sd / √n =    2.0000   / √   4   =   1.0000      
                          
t-statistic = (D̅ - µd)/SE = (   3   -   0   ) /    1.0000   =   3.0000
                          
Degree of freedom, DF=   n - 1 =    3                  
  
p-value =        0.0577   [excel function: =t.dist.2t(t-stat,df) ]               
Decision:   p-value>α , Do not reject null hypothesis                      
there is no significant difference between means.


Related Solutions

A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back...
A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back pain. Prior to testing the patch, each of n = 8 patients rates the current level of back pain on a scale from 1 to 10. After wearing the patch for 90 minutes, a second pain rating is recorded. The data are as follows: Before      After                         6            2                         8            3                         9            4                         8            1                       10           2                         5           ...
A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back...
A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back pain. Prior to testing the patch, each of n = 4 patients rates the current level of back pain on a scale from 1 to 8. After wearing the patch for 90 minutes, a second pain rating is recorded. The data are as follows. ​                                                 Before        After                                           __________________                    G = 36                  6          2                   G2 = 784          ...
A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back...
A researcher would like to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain-relief patch designed for lower back pain. Prior to testing the patch, each of n = 8 patients rates the current level of back pain on a scale from 1 to 10. After wearing the patch for 90 minutes, a second pain rating is recorded. The data are as follows:                   Before      After                         6            2                         8            3                         9            4                         8            1                       10           2                         5           ...
A researcher wants to evaluate the pain relief effectiveness of a new medication for chronic pain...
A researcher wants to evaluate the pain relief effectiveness of a new medication for chronic pain sufferers. Using a pain scale from 0 to 10 (where 0 = no pain at all, and 10 = the most pain you can imagine), she compares the pain level for a sample of n1 = 4 people who received the new medication, with the pain level for a sample of n2 = 4 people who received a placebo. The data are as follows:...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 6.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0? (no pain) to 100? (extreme pain). After given the magnet? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 9.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). After given the magnet treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0? (no pain) to 100? (extreme pain). After given the magnet? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 5.0 and a standard deviation of 2.4. After being given the sham? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.4. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of 11.011.0 and a standard deviation of 2.72.7. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT