Question

In: Economics

Suppose the U.S. economy faces a productivity slump, while at the same time the federal government...

Suppose the U.S. economy faces a productivity slump, while at the same time the federal government begins spending a lot of money on defense and social programs (this is akin to what happened in the U.S. during the 1960s and 1970s). Assume wages are sticky in the short run.

a. For each of the following variables, state whether it rises or falls, or whether the impact is ambiguous, after the two events described above: real GDP growth rate, unemployment, and the inflation rate.

b. If the Fed was concerned about the inflation rate, what action would it take regarding open-market operations? What impact would this have on the federal funds rate and aggregate demand in the economy?

c. What challenge does the Fed face in bringing the economy back to the real GDP growth rate it had before the productivity slump and increase in government spending?

Solutions

Expert Solution

US economy faces a productivity slump, meaning the GDP is declining. The federal government begins spending more money on defense and social programs. Wages don't move and stay the same in short run.

a. Real GDP will grow because the government has increased expenditure, this will be the key driving factor for a rise in real GDP growth rate. Unemployment will fall as government has increased expenditure, which will drive up employment opportunities. Inflation rate rises as money circulated in the economy rises.

b. Fed would reduce the money supply in the economy, thus it will sell bonds to the market through open market operations, wherein money will be pulled back into the system. Federal funds rate would increase as the liquidity will be low in the economy, thus there will be greater demand for credit, which will drive up the funds rate. Aggregate demand would dry up as less money starts circulating in the economy.

c. It has the trouble of higher funds rate, which makes credit expensive, which reduces the chances of industry investing in new technology. Thus it has to sustain the economy, wherein the economy doesn't rely on government expenditure, but instead private consumption and sustainable growth which has to drive GDP.


Related Solutions

The U.S. is a large economy with a trade deficit. Suppose the U.S. federal government increases...
The U.S. is a large economy with a trade deficit. Suppose the U.S. federal government increases income tax. How will this policy affects the U.S. saving, investment, real interest rate, and capital flows? Is it possible to prevent changes due to this tax policy? If yes, how? Explain reasoning.
1. Within the IS-LM model if the government increased investment while at the same time the...
1. Within the IS-LM model if the government increased investment while at the same time the central bank increased the money supply ... total income would increase. real interest rates would decrease. total income would stay the same. the real interest rate would stay the same. real interest rates would increase. total income would decrease. 2. Suppose the central bank decreases the money supply. In the the IS-LM model, this will lead to ... a rightward shift in the LM...
Suppose that a federal election is called at a time when the economy is experiencing a...
Suppose that a federal election is called at a time when the economy is experiencing a recessionary gap and there is a budget deficit. The leader of Party A promises, if elected, to immediately balance the budget by slashing government spending. The leader of Party B promises, if elected, to stimulate the economy with a tax decrease. What would be the effect of each party’s proposed policy on each of the following. The effect of Party A's proposed policy on:...
Suppose we learn the news that suggests that the economy in Europe is likely to slump...
Suppose we learn the news that suggests that the economy in Europe is likely to slump over the next 12 months. Use the model of supply and demand (and a brief explanation) to predict whether the Euro will appreciate or depreciate. Note: be complete in your explanation; it seems likely that more than one factor is at play in this supply and demand change.)
Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over...
Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over the next ten years, with no change in tax rates. Describe the effects of such a policy according to the three business cycle models, assuming that the policy is fully credible) Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over the next ten years, with no change in tax rates. Describe the effects of such a policy...
Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over...
Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over the next ten years, with no change in tax rates. Describe the effects of such a policy according to the three business cycle models, assuming that the policy is fully credible
Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over...
Suppose the U.S. government announces that it will bring the federal budget deficit to zero, over the next ten years, with no change in tax rates. Describe the effects of such a policy according to the three business cycle models, assuming that the policy is fully credible
1.Suppose that the federal government has a budget deficit and the economy is closed. Using the...
1.Suppose that the federal government has a budget deficit and the economy is closed. Using the savings–investment spending identity, explain how this affects investment spending. 2.The market for loanable funds is in equilibrium. All else equal, the federal government has eliminated taxes on interest earned from savings. Describe how this will affect the market for loanable funds, the equilibrium interest rate, and the equilibrium quantity of loanable funds.
Suppose the U.S. President is deciding whether the federal government should spend more on research to...
Suppose the U.S. President is deciding whether the federal government should spend more on research to find a cure for heart disease. He asks you, one of his economic advisors to prepare a report discussing the relevant factors he should consider. Use the concepts of opportunity cost and trade-offs to discuss some of the main issues you would cover in your report. i want new ANSWER
Suppose the U.S. President is deciding whether the federal government should spend more on research to...
Suppose the U.S. President is deciding whether the federal government should spend more on research to find a cure for heart disease. He asks you, one of his economic advisors to prepare a report discussing the relevant factors he should consider. Use the concepts of opportunity cost and trade-offs to discuss some of the main issues you would cover in your report.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT