In: Statistics and Probability
A new kind of typhoid shot is being developed by a medical research team. The old typhoid shot was known to protect the population for a mean time of 36 months, with a standard deviation of 3 months. To test the time variability of the new shot, a random sample of 29 people were given the new shot. Regular blood tests showed that the sample standard deviation of protection times was 1.5 months. Using a 0.05 level of significance, test the claim that the new typhoid shot has a smaller variance of protection times.
(a) What is the level of significance?
State the null and alternate hypotheses.
Ho: σ2 = 9; H1: σ2 < 9
Ho: σ2 = 9; H1: σ2 > 9
Ho: σ2 < 9; H1: σ2 = 9
Ho: σ2 = 9; H1: σ2 ≠ 9
(b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample.
(Round your answer to two decimal places.)
What are the degrees of freedom?
What assumptions are you making about the original
distribution?
We assume a normal population distribution.
We assume a exponential population distribution.
We assume a uniform population distribution.
We assume a binomial population distribution.
(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test
statistic.
P-value > 0.100
0.050 < P-value < 0.100
0.025 < P-value < 0.050
0.010 < P-value < 0.025
0.005 < P-value < 0.010
P-value < 0.005
(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or
fail to reject the null hypothesis?
Since the P-value > α, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Since the P-value > α, we reject the null hypothesis.
Since the P-value ≤ α, we reject the null hypothesis.
Since the P-value ≤ α, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the
application.
At the 5% level of significance, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the new typhoid shot has a smaller variance of protection times.
At the 5% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new typhoid shot has a smaller variance of protection times.
(f) Find a 90% confidence interval for the population standard
deviation. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
lower limit | |
upper limit |
Interpret the results in the context of the application.
We are 90% confident that σ lies outside this interval.
We are 90% confident that σ lies above this interval.
We are 90% confident that σ lies within this interval.
We are 90% confident that σ lies below this interval.
Answer a
The level of significance is defined as the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis by the test when it is really true, which is denoted as α. That is, P (Type I error) = α.
The null and alternate hypotheses: Ho: σ2 = 9; H1: σ2 < 9
Answer b
Test statistics for the test is
where N is the sample size and s is the sample standard deviation.
The more this ratio(s/σ0 ) deviates from 1, the more likely we are to reject the null hypothesis.
We have N=29 ,s=1.5 and σ0 =3
Therefor,
Critical Region: Reject the null hypothesis if T< 2α,N−1
where 2.,N−1 is the critical value of the chi-square distribution with N - 1 degrees of freedom.
We assume a normal population distribution
Answer c
P-value of the sample test statistic is 0.00003
P-value < 0.005
Answer d
Since the P-value ≤ α, we reject the null hypothesis.
Answer e
At the 5% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new typhoid shot has a smaller variance of protection times.
Answer f
90% confidence interval is given as
Lower limit =
Upper limit =
We are 90% confident that σ lies within this interval.