In: Finance
Pucker Distributors handles the warehousing of perishable foods and is considering replacing one of it primary cold storage units. The company had previously hired a consultant at a cost of $25,000 to study the feasibility of replacing its cold storage unit.
One vendor has offered to sell Pucker a cold storage unit for $250,000 with an expected life of 10 years. The unit is projected to reduce electricity costs over the current unit by $50,000 per year. However, it requires a $20,000 refurbishing every two years, beginning two years after purchase. The value of the unit at the end of 10 years is $5,000.
Another vendor has offered to sell Pucker a cold storage unit with similar capabilities for $300,000 and also with an expected life of 10 years. It will produce the same savings in electricity costs, but requires refurbishing every five years at a cost of $40,000. The value of the unit at the end of 10 years is $10,000.
Pucker's cost of capital is 8.5%.
Please show with Excel formatting and formulas used
Net asset value of Vendor 1st:
| Year | Cash Inflow | Cash Outflow | Net Cash Flow | PV Factor | Present Value | 
| 0 | 250000 | -250000 | 1 | -250000 | |
| 1 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.921659 | 46082.94931 | |
| 2 | 50000 | 20000 | 30000 | 0.849455 | 25483.6586 | 
| 3 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.782908 | 39145.40492 | |
| 4 | 50000 | 20000 | 30000 | 0.721574 | 21647.22853 | 
| 5 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.665045 | 33252.27116 | |
| 6 | 50000 | 20000 | 30000 | 0.612945 | 18388.35272 | 
| 7 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.564926 | 28246.31754 | |
| 8 | 50000 | 20000 | 30000 | 0.520669 | 15620.08343 | 
| 9 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.47988 | 23993.98377 | |
| 10 | 50000 | 20000 | 30000 | 0.442285 | 13268.56245 | 
| Scrap | 5000 | 0 | 5000 | 0.442285 | 2211.425 | 
| Net Present Value | 15128.81243 | ||||
Net Present Value of Vendor 2nd:
| Year | Cash Inflow | Cash Outflow | Net Cash Flow | PV Factor | Present Value | 
| 0 | 300000 | -300000 | 1 | -300000 | |
| 1 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.921659 | 46082.94931 | |
| 2 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.849455 | 42472.76434 | |
| 3 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.782908 | 39145.40492 | |
| 4 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.721574 | 36078.71421 | |
| 5 | 50000 | 40000 | 10000 | 0.665045 | 6650.454233 | 
| 6 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.612945 | 30647.25453 | |
| 7 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.564926 | 28246.31754 | |
| 8 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.520669 | 26033.47239 | |
| 9 | 50000 | 50000 | 0.47988 | 23993.98377 | |
| 10 | 50000 | 40000 | 10000 | 0.442285 | 4422.85415 | 
| Scrap | 10000 | 0 | 10000 | 0.442285 | 4422.85 | 
| Net Present Value | -16225.83061 | ||||
As the NPV of Vendor 2nd is negative, Pucker should by the project from Vendor 1st.
Formulas as as follows
net cash inflow= cash inflow- cash out flow
pv factor=1/(1+r)^n

Present value = pv factor* net cash flow
Please do not forget to upvote my solution if you like the same.
Feel free to ask any query via comments.
Good Luck!