In: Finance
Wal-Mart |
Starbucks |
|
Account |
Jan. 31, 2013 |
Sep. 30, 2013 |
Sales |
$476,294 |
$14,892 |
COGS |
$358,069 |
$6,382 |
SG&A |
$91,763 |
$5,929 |
EBIT |
$26,462 |
$2,581 |
Interest |
$2,335 |
$28 |
Taxes |
$8,105 |
$945 |
Net Income |
$16,022 |
$1,608 |
As per rules I am answering the first 4 subparts of the question.
1:
Wal-Mart | Starbucks | |||
Account | Jan. 31, 2013 | Common Size | Sep. 30, 2013 | Common Size |
Sales | $476,294 | 100.00% | $14,892 | 100.00% |
COGS | $358,069 | 75.18% | $6,382 | 42.86% |
SG&A | $91,763 | 19.27% | $5,929 | 39.81% |
EBIT | $26,462 | 5.56% | $2,581 | 17.33% |
Interest | $2,335 | 0.49% | $28 | 0.19% |
Taxes | $8,105 | 1.70% | $945 | 6.35% |
Net Income | $16,022 | 3.36% | $1,608 | 10.80% |
2: Starbucks is doing a better job of getting sales dollars to net income. It has a higher Net Income ratio of 10.8% ascompared to 3.36% of Walmart.
3: The cost of goods sold calculated as a percentage of sales is much higher in case of Wal-Mart as compared to Starbucks. We see from the analysis that cost of goods sold is 75.18% of sales in case of Wal-Mart while the cost of goods sold of Starbucks is 42.86% of total sales.
4:
Current ratio= current assets/current liabilities
= (net working capital+ current liabilities)/current liabilities
= (1050+4300)/4300
=5350/4300
=1.24
Quick ratio= (current assets-inventory)/current liabilities
= (5350-1300)/4300
=0.94