Question

In: Computer Science

Regular => Context-Free Give a proof by induction on regular expressions that: For any language A,...

Regular => Context-Free

Give a proof by induction on regular expressions that:

For any language A, if A is regular, then A is also context-free.

You may assume that the statements from the previous Closure under Context-Free Languages problem are proved.

R is a regular expression if RR is:

  1. a for some a∈alphabet Σ,

  2. the empty string ε,

  3. the empty set ∅,

  4. R​1​​∪R​2​​, sometimes written R​1​​∣R​2​​, where R​1​​ and R​2​​ are regular expressions,

  5. R​1​​∘R​2​​, sometimes written R​1​​R​2​​, where R​1​​ and R​2​​ are regular expressions,

  6. R​1​∗​​, where R​1​​ is a regular expression.

Closure under Context-Free Languages

  • union

  • concatentation

  • Kleene star

Solutions

Expert Solution

Hi,

All regular languages are context free languages .we can prove it by induction.

A context free languge can be defined as a language that are generated by context free grammers.It have some production rule.A regular language is a language that is expressed using regular expression.We can prove that all egular languaes are ontext free by proving that for eery regular languages there is a context free grammer exist.We know that regular languages are closed under union,concatenation and kleen star.We need to prove that htey are closed under context free grammer also.Let us consider:

  • Union : If R1 and R2 are regular languages then R1 R2 is also regular.We need to prove that they are closed under context free language.For that we need to construct a grammer.Suppose P is a start symbol and it produces P->P1|P2,so P->P1 ,here P1 matches R1 and P->P2 and it matches R2 so we can write the rule as P->R1|R2.
  • Concatination: If R1 and R2 are regular languages then R1R2 is also regular.We can create a production rule of concatination in context free grammer as P->P1P2.Here P1 matcher R1 in the regular language and P2 matches R2 in the regular language.So the production can be write as P->R1R2
  • Kleenstar: If R1 is a regular language then R1* is also regular .Let P1 be generated by context free grammer and we can define P->P1P so that every word in P1* is generated by P and R1 matches P1 .So the production rule becomes P-> R1*.

Hence it is proved.

Thank you....


Related Solutions

5 Regular => Context-Free Give a proof by induction on regular expressions that: For any language...
5 Regular => Context-Free Give a proof by induction on regular expressions that: For any language A, if A is regular, then A is also context-free. You may assume that the statements from the previous Closure under Context-Free Languages problem are proved.
Prove that all regular languages are context free. Note: Proof must proceed by structural induction on...
Prove that all regular languages are context free. Note: Proof must proceed by structural induction on regular expressions Please prove by Structural Induction. Will Upvote for correct answer. Thanks
Write regular expressions that describes the following language: The language over {0,1,/} that contains all and...
Write regular expressions that describes the following language: The language over {0,1,/} that contains all and only the strings that are base-2 (as above, you can use base-10 if you prefer) representations of rational numbers. Define a representation of a rational number to be either a representation of an integer, or two representations of integers separated by “/”. Leading 0s are allowed this time.
Write regular expressions that describes the following language: The language over {0,1} that contains all and...
Write regular expressions that describes the following language: The language over {0,1} that contains all and only the strings that are base-2 representations of odd positive integers. Do not allow leading 0s. (If you are more comfortable writing bulky regular expressions than you are working in base-2, you may write a regular expression for strings that are base-10 representations of odd integers without leading 0s, using alphabet {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}.)
Prove that the proof by mathematical induction and the proof by strong induction are equivalent
Prove that the proof by mathematical induction and the proof by strong induction are equivalent
1. Pumping Lemma: a. Is the following language a regular language? (Use pumping lemma in proof.)...
1. Pumping Lemma: a. Is the following language a regular language? (Use pumping lemma in proof.) L = {0n 1n 2n | n ≥ 0} b. What is (i.e., define) the CFL pumping lemma?
Give a proof by induction that the number of nodes of a full binary tree with...
Give a proof by induction that the number of nodes of a full binary tree with a height of "h" is: (2^(h+1))-1.
Determine whether or not the following languages are regular. If the language is regular then give...
Determine whether or not the following languages are regular. If the language is regular then give an NFA or regular expression for the language. Otherwise, use the pumping lemma for regular languages or closure properties to prove the language is not regular. 1) L = { 0 n1 k : k ≤ n ≤ 2k} 2) L = { 0 n1 k : n > 0, k > 0 } È { 1 k0 n : k > 0, n...
Provide an example of a proof by mathematical induction. Indicate whether the proof uses weak induction...
Provide an example of a proof by mathematical induction. Indicate whether the proof uses weak induction or strong induction. Clearly state the inductive hypothesis. Provide a justification at each step of the proof and highlight which step makes use of the inductive hypothesis.
a) Give 5 good examples of Regular language. b) Give 5 good examples of Regular Grammar.
a) Give 5 good examples of Regular language. b) Give 5 good examples of Regular Grammar.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT