In: Psychology
In the Little Albert experiment, Watson taught a young child to associate the sight of a white rat with fear. He did this by giving the child a rat, then making a very loud sound near him, which elicited a fear response. Eventually, the sight of any white, fuzzy object (including a coat, a rabbit, and a Santa mask) elicited an immediate fear response (Cherry & Morin, 2019). Do you think this experiment by Watson was ethical? He created a lifelong fear in the child for the purposes of research. If you were going to repeat his experiment, what would you do differently to make it more ethical by today's standards?
The Little Albert experiment was conducted by Watson and Rayner in the 1920s to demonstrate how fear could be conditioned. Albert was an infant who was conditioned to be afraid of rats by associating it with a loud noise (of which he was already fearful). Gradually, this fear generalized to other white furry Objects and Albert would show signs of distress upon encountering any such object. While the Little Albert study showed how fears could be conditioned, it was highly unethical on the following grounds:
In order to make this experiment more ethical, the following considerations could be kept in mind: