Why
is societies limited access to higher education a problem ?
Why
is societies limited access to higher education a problem ?
Solutions
Expert Solution
The rising cost of a college education and limited access to
financial aid may create a less productive workforce and steeper
wealth inequity.Students with low-income parents are discovering
that it is more difficult to find funds to pay for a college
education now compared to students of similar economic backgrounds
in the 1980s.
Over the last two decades, more higher-paying jobs required a
college degree. The higher demand for a college education led
universities to increase tuition fee. At the same time, money
available through government loan programs remained flat or, when
adjusting for in inflation, declined.
Constraints on financial aid could have far-reaching economic
impacts. When poor but intelligent workers are unable to earn a
college degree, their career choices are restricted.And lack of
collge education could lead to higher rates of unemployment,higher
crime rates,lack of participation in voting,high poverty rates
since no degree means no job and also create adverse effects
physical and mental health of the individuals.
The USA has developed extreme levels of economic and social
inequality, social mobility is declining, and higher education has
been unable to compensate in fact, higher education itself is
becoming more stratified.The upper middle class dominates access to
the top private universities, participation rates have stopped
growing, and graduation rates among low-income families are very
disappointing. Inequality is also increasing in Canada as
well.
Most people earn most of their income from their job. Only the
top 0.1 per cent earn the majority of their income from capital
(wealth) such as government bonds, shares, investments, and
property. Wealth is much more concentrated than labour incomes.
Access to good education depends increasingly on the income,
education and wealth of one’s parents.This is true at both the
school and college levels.
In higher education, people’s unequal capacity to pay and to
compete for selective places has been joined by increasing
stratification among the institutions themselves. The institutional
hierarchy is getting steeper.
Education is a matter of social relations. We are all affected
by the number and value of high quality educational places and by
what governs access to those places. We need to assert the role of
higher education as a public good and as a response to social and
economic inequality, rather than as a mechanism for enhancing
inequality, or a dead end with limited capacity to lift the
individual and collective position.
We need to build more egalitarian higher education systems with
a more broadly distributed capacity to create value. This will
strengthen the relation between higher education and social
outcomes and opportunities. There needs to be fairer selection into
elite institutions, and the elimination of financial barriers to
attend those institutions.
1. Higher education tends to lead to higher salaries because
education:
a) increases productivity
b) enables graduates to repay loans.
c) confers on one a higher social status.
d) requires time to acquire.
2. What changes in a labor market graph if the workers of a
company form a union?
a) The labor market supply curve shifts to the right.
b) The labor market supply curve shifts to the left.
c) The labor market demand curve shifts to the right....
short answer:
Why would agrarian societies have social stratification that
emphasizes caste? Why would industrial societies have social
stratification that mixes caste with meritocracy?
State one way in which caste and class systems differ.
What is meritocracy? What part does it play in class
systems?
What is status consistency? Provide a description of a person
with high status consistency and an example of someone with low
status consistency.
Define structural social mobility. How does it differ from
individual social mobility?...