Question

In: Accounting

You are an audit supervisor of Samyantwi & Associate and you are planning the audit of...

You are an audit supervisor of Samyantwi & Associate and you are planning the audit of Franko
Company, a listed company, for the year ending 31st March 2017. The company manufactures
computer components and forecast profit before tax is GHS33.6m and total assets are GHS79.3m.
Franko Company distributes its products through wholesalers as well as via its own website. The
website was upgraded during the year at a cost of GHS1.1m. Additionally, the company entered
into a transaction in February to purchase a new warehouse which will cost GHS3.2m. Franko
Company’s legal advisers are working to ensure that the legal process will be completed by the
year end. The company issued GHS5m of irredeemable preference shares to finance the warehouse
purchase.
The company has launched several new products this year and all but one of these new launches
have been successful. Feedback on product Luge, launched four months ago, has been mixed, and
the company has just received notice from one of their customers, Adanko Company, of intended
legal action. They are alleging the product sold to them was faulty, resulting in a significant loss
of information and an ongoing detrimental impact on profits. As a precaution, sales of the Luge
product have been halted and a product recall has been initiated for any Luge products sold in the
last four months.
The finance director is keen to announce the company’s financial results to the stock market earlier
than the previous year and in order to facilitate this, he has asked if the audit could be completed
in a shorter timescale. In addition, the company intends to propose a final dividend once the
financial statements are finalized.
Franko Company’s finance director has informed the audit engagement partner that one of the
company’s non-executive directors (NEDs) has just resigned, and he has enquired if the partners
at Samyantwi & Associates can help Franko Company in recruiting a new NED. Specifically he
has requested the Engagement Quality Control Reviewer, who was until last year the Audit
Engagement Partner of Franko Company, to assist the company in this recruitment. Samyantwi &
Associates also provides taxation services for Franko Company in the form of tax return
preparation along with some tax planning advice. The Finance Director has recommended to the
audit committee of Franko Company that this year’s audit fee should be based on the company’s
profit before tax. At today’s date, 20% of last year’s audit fee is still outstanding and was due to
be paid three months ago.
Required:
i. Identify and explain TEN ethical threats which may affect the independence of
Samyantwi & Associates audit of Franko Company; and
ii. For each threat, suggest a safeguard to reduce the risk to an acceptable level
Prepare your answer using two columns headed Ethical threat and Possible Safeguard
respectively

Solutions

Expert Solution

1. Risk: Franco Co’s Non-executive director has resigned, and their directors have requested the partners of Samyantwi & Associates to assist them in recruiting a new director. A Non-Executive Director has an important part to play in looking after the audit process and the audit firm. So this request can be a self-interest threat as an audit firm cannot take part in the recruitment of the board of directors.

Safeguard: Samyantwi & Associate can assist by advising the management regarding the qualification suitable for the role and review the list of candidates but they cannot make a decision in the recruitment.

2. Risk: The finance director who is eager to publish the financial results for Franco Co has requested the audit firm to complete the audit in a shorter span of time. This may result in an intimidation threat as they may be put under pressure to complete the audit quickly and result in missing out on key procedures of and this could affect the objectivity and quality of the audit performed.

Safeguard: Engagement partner can discuss with the finance director to commence the audit a little earlier than the original time so that there is no pressure within the audit team to complete the audit. If they do no agree, the partner shall inform them politely that the team will undertake the audit in consideration of all standards and quality control measures and so the chances of completing the audit in a shorter span of time is unlikely.

3. Risk: The audit firm currently provides taxation services, audit engagement, and possibly services related to the recruitment of the members of the board of directors. There is a potential intimidation threat as a large portion of the income of the Samyantwi & Associates is now coming from Franco and Co.

Safeguard: Audit firm should assess whether the total fees received from Franco and Co. would be more than 15% of gross income from practice for two consecutive years. If yes, then it should be discussed whether recruitment and taxation services should be undertaken or not.

4. Risk: Twenty percent of the previous year’s audit fee is currently pending for payment and was due three months ago. This could be a self-interest threat if the fees continue to remain unpaid, as Samyantwi & Associate may feel the pressure to agree to certain accounting adjustments which may not be as per the rules and regulations.

Safeguard: Samyantwi & Associates should discuss with the management the reasons why the audit fee is still overdue. They can come to an agreement where the payment of fees can have a new structure by making sure the entire fees are paid before the audit is completed.

5. Risk: It was mentioned that the audit fee is based on the profit before tax of Franko Co. This type of fee could indicate a contingent fee. Contingent fees could result in a self-interest threat. If the audit fee is based on profit, the engagement team may be pressurized to ignore certain audit adjustments which could lead to a reduction in profit

Safeguard: The audit firm should not accept contingent fees and must communicate to the management at Franco and Co.

6. Risk: It was mentioned that the website had been upgraded. So there are chances that the data on the website is not updated and could be exposed to security risks.

Safeguard: Samwantwi & Co should review the website thoroughly to check if any activity is pending to be implemented in relation to the upgrade.

7. Risk: Franco and Co have halted the sales of the new product and a recall has been initiated. This could result in malpractices such as altering the books of account

Safeguard: The audit firm should review the sales and pricing thoroughly to avoid material misstatements in the financial statements.

8. Risk: Franco and Co. have entered into an agreement to purchase a new warehouse but the legal procedures will be completed only by the end of the year. There is a threat of initiating business in the warehouse without completing all the legal formalities.

Safeguard: The audit firm should discuss with the management regarding the purchase of the warehouse and verify all the documents related to the purchase.

9. Risk: There is a risk of inadequate disclosure in the books of accounts while issuing preference shares to finance the purchase of the warehouse.

Safeguard: Auditor should ensure that the categorization of the issue of shares is done correctly to avoid any misstatements.

10. Risk: The engagement quality control reviewer (EQCR) of Franko and Co was their audit engagement partner until last year. There could be a familiarity threat involved in it.

Safeguard: Franco and Co. are a listed company and hence the previous engagement partner should not be conducting the audit for at least two consecutive years. Another EQCR shall be appointed.


Related Solutions

You are an audit supervisor of Samyantwi & Associate and you are planning the audit of...
You are an audit supervisor of Samyantwi & Associate and you are planning the audit of Franko Company, a listed company, for the year ending 31st March 2017. The company manufactures computer components and forecast profit before tax is GHS33.6m and total assets are GHS79.3m. Franko Company distributes its products through wholesalers as well as via its own website. The website was upgraded during the year at a cost of GHS1.1m. Additionally, the company entered into a transaction in February...
You are an audit supervisor of Samyantwi & Associate and you are planning the audit of...
You are an audit supervisor of Samyantwi & Associate and you are planning the audit of Franko Company, a listed company, for the year ending 31st March 2017. The company manufactures computer components and forecast profit before tax is GHS33.6m and total assets are GHS79.3m. Franko Company distributes its products through wholesalers as well as via its own website. The website was upgraded during the year at a cost of GHS1.1m. Additionally, the company entered into a transaction in February...
You are the audit supervisor of Azuma Audit firm and currently planning the audit of an...
You are the audit supervisor of Azuma Audit firm and currently planning the audit of an existing client, SWOW Ltd. whose year-end was 30 April 2019. SWOW is a pharmaceutical company, which manufactures and supplies a wide range of medical supplies. The draft financial statements show revenue of $35·6 million and profit before tax of $5·9 million. SWOW’s previous finance director left the company in December 2018 after it was discovered that he had been claiming fraudulent expenses from the...
You are an audit supervisor of Pluto & Co and are currently planning the audit of...
You are an audit supervisor of Pluto & Co and are currently planning the audit of your client, Venus Magnets Co (Venus) which manufactures decorative magnets. Its year end is 31 December 20155 and the forecast profit before tax is $9·6 million. During the year, the directors reviewed the useful lives and depreciation rates of all classes of plant and machinery. This resulted in an overall increase in the asset lives and a reduction in the depreciation charge for the...
You are the audit supervisor of Seagull & Co and are currently planning the audit of...
You are the audit supervisor of Seagull & Co and are currently planning the audit of your existing client, Eagle Heating Co., for the year ending December 31, 2020. Eagle manufactures and sells heating and plumbing equipment to a number of home improvement stores across the country. Eagle has experienced increased competition and is facing significant pressure to meet sales targets. As a result, it has decreased the selling price of its products significantly since September 2020. The finance director...
You are an audit supervisor of Pluto & Co and are currently planning the audit of...
You are an audit supervisor of Pluto & Co and are currently planning the audit of your client, Venus Magnets Co (Venus) which manufactures decorative magnets. Its year end is 31 December 20155 and the forecast profit before tax is $9·6 million. During the year, the directors reviewed the useful lives and depreciation rates of all classes of plant and machinery. This resulted in an overall increase in the asset lives and a reduction in the depreciation charge for the...
SCENARIO-2 You are an audit supervisor of Star & Co, planning the final audit of a...
SCENARIO-2 You are an audit supervisor of Star & Co, planning the final audit of a new client, Franker Construction Co, for the year ending 31 December 2019. The company specializes in property construction and providing ongoing annual maintenance services for properties previously constructed. Forecast profit before tax is RO 46 millon and total assets are expected to be RO 53 million which is much higher than the balance of previous years. The company has recently upgraded their website during...
An audit associate is preparing an audit program for the audit of a client’s allowance for...
An audit associate is preparing an audit program for the audit of a client’s allowance for doubtful accounts. To gather evidence in support of the valuation assertion, the associate included the following audit procedure in the audit program: Confirm accounts receivable by sending positive confirmations to a sample of customer account balances. Required a. Evaluate the relevance of the procedure in addressing the valuation assertion. b. Comment on the reliability of the evidence gathered using the procedure.
You are an audit supervisor of Owen & Co and you are reviewing the documentation describing...
You are an audit supervisor of Owen & Co and you are reviewing the documentation describing Sonic Publishing Co.’s purchases and payables system in preparation for the interim and final audit for the year ending 30 September 2019. The company has twenty bookshops and a warehouse, which holds the majority of the company’s inventory. Your firm has audited Sonic Publishing Co for a number of years and as such, audit documentation is available from the previous year’s file, including internal...
As an audit supervisor in an international public accounting firm, you are in charge of the...
As an audit supervisor in an international public accounting firm, you are in charge of the audit of several firms with 31 March year-ends. The financial statements of these firms are prepared in compliance with U.S GAAP, and are expected to be authorized for issue in early June 2017. Your audit juniors on the job have approached you for advice on the following case: Auto Arrow (AA) does not maintain a proper accounting system. A main bulk of its existing...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT