Question

In: Civil Engineering

Problem 1: Four design alternatives were proposed. Each design alternative has unique costs and benefits. Given...

Problem 1: Four design alternatives were proposed. Each design alternative has unique costs and benefits. Given the information for the four mutually exclusive in the table below, recommend the best alternative using the incremental B/C ratio analysis method knowing that the MARR is 6%. (Use the PW in your calculation)

Alternative 1 2 3 4
Capital investment cost $ 12500 11000 12500 16800
Annual operating and maintenance cost $ 120 480 450 140
Annual utility savings $ 580 700 950 1300
Annual revenue $ 700 550 200 250
Annual other benefit $ 400 750 150 500
Project life in years 40 40 40 40

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given data:

MARR = 6%

Alternative 1 2 3 4
Capital Investment Cost $ 12500 11000 12500 16800
Annual O&M cost $ 120 480 450 140
Annual utility savings $ 580 700 950 1300
Annual revenue $ 700 550 200 250
Annual other benefit $ 400 750 150 500
Project life in years 40 40 40 40

Required formula to use:

where P = present worth

          A = annual worth

          i= rate of interest

          n = project life in years

FROM THE COMPOUND INTEREST TABLES OR THE SUBSTITUTION OF VALUES.

Equivalent Cost (in PW) of alternative 1:

Equivalent Benefits of alternative 1:

Equivalent cost for alternative 2:

Equivalent Benefits of alternative 2:

Equivalent COST of alternative 3:

Equivalent Benefits of alternative 3:

Equivalent COST of alternative 4:

Equivalent Benefits of alternative 4:

Tabulating the calculated values as follows

Alternatives Equivalent costs Equivalent Benefits
1 14305.52 25277.28
2 18222.08 30092
3 19,270.7 19559.8
4 18906.44 30,844.3

Now arrange the alternatives in the increasing order of their equivalent costs

EC1   < EC2 < EC4 < EC3

Select first two alternatives from the order.

Alternatives 1 and 2:

Compare 2 to 1:

Incremental Values:

here ,there are no disbenefits specified and hence directly the benfits/cost ratio is considered.

HERE, incremental benefit to cost ratio is greater than 1.

Hence Eliminate alternative 1 and Select alternative 2.

Now , alternatives 2 and 4 are taken into consideration.

Compare alternative 4 to 2:

HERE, incremental benefit to cost ratio is greater than 1.

Hence Select alternative 4 and eliminate alternative 2.

Now, alternatives 4 and 3 are taken into consideration.

Compare alternative 3 to 4

Here the neagative value indicates that the disbenefits are higher than the actual benefits generated. Hence Eliminate alternative 3 and Select alternative 4

Therefore the alternative to be selected among the alternatives is ALTERNATIVE 4.


Related Solutions

What were the anticipated costs and benefits for each participant in the proposed joint venture? Fill in the following table.
Case Study 2-3Case Source: https://www.homeworkmarket.com/sites/default/files/q3/05/11/levis.pdfQuestion:What were the anticipated costs and benefits for each participant in the proposed joint venture? Fill in the following table.FirmFinancial CostsProposed Financial BenefitsProposed Strategic Business BenefitsLevisCCTC
*Two part question A proposed project has the following costs and benefits: Year Costs Benefits 0...
*Two part question A proposed project has the following costs and benefits: Year Costs Benefits 0 2,000 1 1,000 2 1,000 3 1,000 4 2,000 5 2,000 Assuming an interest rate of 10%, the project's simple payback period is most nearly _________. A. 2 years B. 4 years C. 6 years D. 5 years E. 7 years Using the information from the problem above and linear interpolation, the project's discounted payback period is most nearly ___________. A. 3.62 years B....
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. Which alternative would you select?
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 12​% per year. At the end of the useful​ life, the investment will be sold. A​ decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. X Y Z Investment cost ​$275,000 ​$140,000 ​$370,000 Annual revenue ​$85,840 ​$53,207 ​$93,911 Annual cost ​$23,183 ​$14,370 ​$20,543 Useful life 15 years...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. A decision maker must select one of these alternatives. A B Investment cost $50,000 $30,000 Annual Revenue 15,000 10,000 Salvage value 5,000 3,000 Useful life (yrs.) 5 5 For all parts below, do not convert from another form of equivalent worth; e.g., AW→FW. 1. Compute the AW for Alt A. Based on this measure, should the...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. Which alternative would you select?
An engineering company has two alternatives for improving a production line. Alternative A has first costs...
An engineering company has two alternatives for improving a production line. Alternative A has first costs of $3,000, a salvage value of $500, and a service life of 3 years. Alternative B has equipment costs of $4,500, a salvage value of $1,000, and a service life of 6 years. Use a present worth analysis to determine which alternative is economically superior with i=10%. Your solution will be closest to: a. Alternative A @ - $3,300 b. Alternative B @ -...
Medical Technology Enterprises is trying to select the best investment from among four alternatives. Each alternative...
Medical Technology Enterprises is trying to select the best investment from among four alternatives. Each alternative involves an initial outlay of $100,000. and the company’s cost of capital (WACC) is 8%. Their future cash flows follow: Evaluate and rank each alternative based on payback period, net present value, and internal rate of return. Year Alternative A ($) Alternative B (S) Alternative C ($) 1 10,000 50,000 25,000 2 20,000 40,000 25,000 3 30,000 30,000 25,000 4 40,000 0 25,000 5...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 40 0.20 70 0.20 75 0.40 Acceptable 80 0.20 140 0.20 255 0.40 Successful 135 0.60 205 0.60 405 0.20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 60 0.40 80 0.20 70 0.30 Acceptable 85 0.40 150 0.40 275 0.60 Successful 140 0.20 220 0.40 410 0.10 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.) Coefficient of Variation Rank...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT