Question

In: Economics

Consider the following theoretical sample of countries who can produce the following goods using only labor....

Consider the following theoretical sample of countries who can produce the following goods using only labor. Each unit of labor can produce the following amount of output:

                                                    Cars              Shoes

                        China                     10                   500

                        India                      2                     400

                        Brazil                     5                     250

1. If the price of a shoe is $1, what is the relative price of a car in each country in autarky (i.e. when there is no trade)?

2. Consider each of the 3 possible trading pairs in turn: China-India, China-Brazil, India-Brazil. Assuming free and frictionless trade and that each of these pairs could only trade with one another at a time, who would want to trade what and why?

Solutions

Expert Solution

1) China can produce either 10 cars or 500 shoes. If price of shoes is $1, worth of 500 shoes would be $500. Thus price of one car 500 / 10 = $50

India can produce either 2 cars or 400 shoes. If price of shoes is $1, worth of 400 shoes would be $400. Thus price of one car 400 / 2 = $200

Brazil can produce either 5 cars or 250 shoes. If price of shoes is $1, worth of 250 shoes would be $250. Thus price of one car 250 / 5 = $50

2)

Cars Shoes Opportunity Cost of 1 car with respect to shoes Opportunity cost of 1 shoes with respect to car
China 10 500 50 0.02
India 2 400 200 0.005
Brazil 5 250 50 0.02

In trade between China - India, India owns comparative advantage in producing shoes because of lower opportunity cost while China owns comparative advantage in producing car because of lower opportunity cost. China will imports shoes from India and exports cars.

In trade between China - Brazil, both countries have the same opportunity cost of both products. No country will gain from trade.

In trade between India - Brazil, India owns comparative advantage in producing shoes because of lower opportunity cost while Brazil owns comparative advantage in producing car because of lower opportunity cost. Brazil will imports shoes from India and exports cars.


Related Solutions

Consider two countries: Canada and Sri Lanka. Assume that each can produce only two goods: maple...
Consider two countries: Canada and Sri Lanka. Assume that each can produce only two goods: maple syrup and jaggery. In a single year, Canada can produce 250,000 tons of maple syrup, or 90,000 tons of jaggery. In the same period of time, Sri Lanka can produce 1,000 tons of maple syrup, or 70,000 tons of jaggery. Suppose that both nations are initially in a state of autarky. If Canada were to produce 170,000 tons of maple syrup and 36,000 tons...
Consider two countries​ (Home and​ Foreign) that produce goods 1​ (with labor and​ capital) and 2​...
Consider two countries​ (Home and​ Foreign) that produce goods 1​ (with labor and​ capital) and 2​ (with labor and​ land). Initially, both countries have the same supply of labor ​(100 units​ each), capital, and land. The capital stock in Home then shrinks. This change shifts in both the production curve for good 1 as a function of labor employed and the associated marginal product of labor curve. Nothing happens to the production and marginal product curves for good 2. a....
Consider two countries (Home and Foreign) that produce goods 1 (with labor and capital) and 2...
Consider two countries (Home and Foreign) that produce goods 1 (with labor and capital) and 2 (with labor and land) according to the production functions q1 = L10.5K0.5 and q2 = L20.5T0.5 where Li is the labor input in sector i = 1, 2, K is capital, and T is land. a. Suppose there is capital inflow from the foreign country so that K increases. How would this affect the marginal product of labor in sector1. (If you do not...
Two large countries, the US and China, produce only two goods, manufactured goods and Financial services,...
Two large countries, the US and China, produce only two goods, manufactured goods and Financial services, using two factors of production, skilled and unskilled labour. The production of Financial services is relatively skill-labour intensive and manufacturing is unskilledlabour intensive. The US is relatively well endowed with skilled labour, whereas China is relatively well endowed with unskilled labour. Assume that each society's preferences over the two goods are identical. (a) Draw the production possibilities frontier (PPF) for the US. Carefully explain...
Two large countries, the US and China, produce only two goods, manufactured goods and financial services,...
Two large countries, the US and China, produce only two goods, manufactured goods and financial services, using two factors of production, skilled and unskilled labour. The production of financial services is relatively skill-labour intensive and manufacturing is unskilled-labour intensive. The US is relatively well endowed with skilled labour, whereas China is relatively well endowed with unskilled labour. Assume that each society‘s preferences over the two goods are identical. (a) Draw the production possibilities frontier (PPF) for the US. Carefully explain...
An economy uses only labor as input to produce two goods, A and B. If its...
An economy uses only labor as input to produce two goods, A and B. If its production possibilities frontier (PPF) of two goods is a negative-sloped straight line, what is the implication in opportunity costs? Will the law of increasing costs still hold? Please state briefly.
Consider the following three countries. Countries can produce wheat, sheep, ore, brick, wood, etc. The output...
Consider the following three countries. Countries can produce wheat, sheep, ore, brick, wood, etc. The output per worker is shown in the table. Countries employ the same number of workers. Redistan Whitney Blueland wheat 1 1 2 sheep 1 2 2 ore 1 2 0 brick 2 1 3 wood 2 1 1 a. Which country has absolute advantage in wheat production? b. Which country has a comparative advantage over brick production in terms of sheep opportunity costs? c. The...
ONLY F AND G There are two countries, Lilliput and Blefuscu, which produce two goods: cilantro...
ONLY F AND G There are two countries, Lilliput and Blefuscu, which produce two goods: cilantro and hummus. In a single year, Lilliput can produce 4,000 tons of cilantro or 4,000 tons of hummus. In the same period of time, Blefescu can produce 500 tons of cilantro or 300 tons of hummus. Show your work as you answer these questions. (a) Which country has absolute advantage in cilantro? (5%) (b) Which country has absolute advantage in hummus? (5%) (c) Which...
Two countries, Spain and Portugal, use two inputs, capital and labor, to produce two goods, wine...
Two countries, Spain and Portugal, use two inputs, capital and labor, to produce two goods, wine and cheese. Wine is relatively capital intensive in production and Spain is the relatively capital abundant country. 5) According to the Rybczynski Theorem, if Portugal were a small country with a free trade policy, growth of the labor force would cause: Question 5 options: wages to fall, and the reward to capital to increase in Portugal. expansion of the cheese industry and contraction of...
Two countries, Spain and Portugal, use two inputs, capital and labor, to produce two goods, wine...
Two countries, Spain and Portugal, use two inputs, capital and labor, to produce two goods, wine and cheese. Wine is relatively capital intensive in production and Spain is the relatively capital abundant country. 4) According to the Factor Price Equalization Theorem wages (earnings from labor) and rent (earnings from capital) between Spain and Portugal will equalize: Question 4 options: with migration of labor and free international movement of capital. solely due to labor migration. solely due to the free international...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT