In: Finance
(For this part, you MUST present sufficient solution steps, and MUST apply specific Excel functions =NPV(…), =IRR(…), =AVERAGE(…), =YIELD(…) whenever applicable..) Ferengi, Inc. is subject to an applicable corporate tax rate of 21 percent, and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 12.5 percent. There is no specific time constraint on investment project payback requirements. Q1: Ferengi is currently contemplating two capital investment plans. Plan A: the upgrade of an information system with an installed cost of $2,400,000. The upgrade system will be depreciated straight-line to zero over the project’s five-year life, at the end of which the system will be worth $400,000 at the market. The system upgrade will not affect sales, but will save the firm $700,000 per year in pretax operating costs; and the upgrade will increase the working efficiency and reduce the net working capital expenditure by $300,000 at the beginning year. What is the NPV of Plan A? What is the IRR of Plan A? Should Ferengi accept or reject Plan A? Q2: Instead of Plan A, Ferengi can alternatively choose Plan B: allocate the $2,400,000 capital budget to develop a new product line. The new product line will be depreciated straight-line to zero over the project’s ten-year life, at the end of which the system will be worth $100,000. The new product line will not only add the firm $830,000 per year in sales, but also add $200,000 per year in pretax operating costs; and the new project line requires an initial investment in net working capital of $300,000 at the beginning year. What would be the NPV of Plan B? What would be the IRR of Plan B? If these two plans are mutually exclusive, shall Ferengi finally choose Plan A or B? This should be done in excel and please show me how you got the formulas in excel....(PLEASE SHOW THE FUNCTIONS IN EXCEL) DO NOT JUST SHOW THE ANSWERS BUT THE ACTUAL FORMULAS USED IN EXCEL
Upgradation of system | |||||||||||
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
Cost of upgradation | -2400000 | ||||||||||
recovery of working capital | 300000 | ||||||||||
pre tax operating savings | 700000 | 700000 | 700000 | 700000 | 700000 | ||||||
less annual depreciation = 2400000/5 | 480000 | 480000 | 480000 | 480000 | 480000 | ||||||
before tax savings | 220000 | 220000 | 220000 | 220000 | 220000 | ||||||
after tax savings = before tax savings*(1-tax rate ) tax rate = 21% | 173800 | 173800 | 173800 | 173800 | 173800 | ||||||
after tax salvage value =sale value*(1-tax rate) = 400000*(1-.21) | 316000 | ||||||||||
net operating cash flow = after tax savings+ annual depreciation+after tax salvage value | -2100000 | 653800 | 653800 | 653800 | 653800 | 969800 | |||||
NPV = Using NPV function in MS excel | NPV(12.5%,G523:K523)+F523 | 403257.1322 | |||||||||
IRR = Using IRR function in MS excel | IRR(F523:K523) | 0.196352715 | |||||||||
Company should accept the plan as NPV is positive and IRR is greater than required rate of return of 12.5% | |||||||||||
New product line | |||||||||||
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Initial investment | -2400000 | ||||||||||
Investment in working capital | -300000 | ||||||||||
Increased sales | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | 830000 | |
increased cost | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | 200000 | |
annual depreciation =2400000/10 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | |
operating profit | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | 390000 | |
after tax profit = operating profit*(1-tax rate) tax rate = 21% | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | 308100 | |
add depreciation | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | 240000 | |
add recovery of working capital | 300000 | ||||||||||
recovery of after tax sale value = 100000*(1-.21) | 79000 | ||||||||||
net operating cash flow = after tax profit+depreciation + recovery of working capital +recovery of after tax sale value | -2700000 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 548100 | 927100 |
net present value = Using NPV function in MS excel | NPV(12.5%,G540:P540)+F540 | 451229.3217 | |||||||||
IRR = Using IRR function in MS excel | IRR(F540:P540) | 16.33% | |||||||||
Upgradation of system | New product line | ||||||||||
NPV | 403257.1322 | 451229.3217 | new product line would be selected as NPV is greater | ||||||||
IRR | 19.64% | 16.33% | As Per IRR both can be selected as IRR of both the options are greater than MARR of 12.5% | ||||||||
As the projects are mutually exclusive NPV favors option of new product line and IRR favors Upgradation of systme so as both projects of unequal life in this case IRR can give misleading results so NPV would be the appropriate method to the final selection of choice so in this case option of new product line would be preferred |