Question

Although Caesar will enjoy an unprecedented amount of power in Rome, Augustus holds the honor of being the first emperor. As a direct result of his actions, the Roman Republic will become the Roman Empire, and will be ruled by an emperor until its collapse in the late 400s. Do you view Augustus as a tyrant? Why or why not? Do you see this as being a positive change or a negative change?

Answer 1

No, I don't see Augustus as a tyrant. From coming to the throne to the time of his reign I don't see any tyranny in his way of ruling and administration. In fact he makes senate responsibe for making public decisions for the welfare of the people. He refrained people from calling himself the king or any authoritative person. Though his accension to the throne makes Rome a Monarchy from republic, but it doesn't change in negative way. He was genius leadership, his communication and flourishing in trade make the countrymen forget their pain and agony. All the reforms were made in a positive way. His decision to continue with the practice of "bread and circuses" marks a positive note as poors were given food and entertainment at the same time. Various working projects were given to private firms so that unemployed people get chance to do something. he decision to start various departments are also a success and achievement, ultimately a positive change. In conclusion we can say that Augustus is not designated as a tyrant, his made changes are positive and for the welfare of the people who seem to live peacefully.