In: Accounting
1. Describe the reasons a naïve observer would consider it overkill to scrutinize a company’s financial statements for signs that management is presenting anything less than a candid picture?
2. How does that method of accounting for a merger or acquisition affect the combined companies’ subsequent competitive strength, ability to generate cash, or reported earnings; and what are the clues that there may be something amiss in an M&A?
3. a) Explain the tension that exists for the auditing firm? (b) What can be said about the existing provisions for issuing financial accounting standards?
Answer 1: Following reasons can be ruled out
Answer 2:
Choosing a method of accounting for a merger or an acquisition will not affect the companies' subsequent competitive strength or its ability to generate cash. Both the things are not dependent in any manner on a method of accounting chosen.
However, the reported earnings might get affected adversely if any wrong method of accounting chosen. As all the investors rely on the reported earnings, it might put the company in a bad picture before investors and other stakeholders where it is not so bad in reality.
Following can be such clues:
Answer 3:
A) The tension that generally exists within an audit firm is maintaining a client and professional standards while executing audits. They have a fear of losing clients if they don't do the work as required by them.