Question

How would Freud’s Theory of Dream Interpretation differ from modern researchers (Cartwright, Hobson, etc.) in rationalizing why some people have reoccurring dreams?

Answer 1

The Psychoanalytic Theory of Dreams was developed by Sigmund freud, whereas the Activation-synthesis model of dreaming was developed by Hobson and McCarley.

Let's understand the difference between these two different theories of dreaming about recurrence of dreams.

Consistent with the psychoanalytic perspective, Sigmund Freud’s theory of dreams instructed that dreams represented unconscious desires, thoughts, and motivations. in keeping with Freud’s psychoanalytic view of personality, people are driven by aggressive and sexual instincts that are pent-up from conscious awareness. whereas these thoughts aren't consciously expressed, analyst instructed that they notice their approach into our awareness via dreams.

In his noted book The Interpretation of Dreams, Freud wrote that dreams are disguised fulfillments of pent-up desires.

He additionally represented 2 completely different parts of dreams: manifest content and substance. Manifest content is created from the particular pictures, thoughts, and content contained inside the dream while the latent contentrepresents the hidden psychological that means of the dream.

Freud’s theory contributed to the recognition of dream interpretation, that remains well-liked these days. However, analysis has did not demonstrate that the manifest content disguises the real psychological significance of a dream.

Activation-Synthesis Model of Dreaming

The activation-synthesis model of dreaming was initial projected by J. Allan Hobson and Henry M. Robert McClarley in 1977. in keeping with this theory, circuits within the brain become activated throughout REM sleep, that causes areas of the visceral brain concerned in emotions, sensations, and memories, together with the corpus amygdaloideum and hippocampus, to become active. The brain synthesizes and interprets this internal activity and tries to seek out that means in these signals, which ends up in dreaming. This model suggests that dreams are a subjective interpretation of signals generated by the brain throughout sleep.

While this theory suggests that dreams are the results of internally generated signals, Hobson doesn't believe that dreams are nonmeaningful. Instead, he suggests that dreaming is "…our most inventive acutely aware state, one within which the chaotic, spontaneous recombination of psychological feature parts produces novel configurations of information: new concepts. whereas several or perhaps most of those concepts could also be nonsensical, if even a couple of of its fanciful merchandise are really helpful, our dream time won't are wasted.

Hobson and McCarley's original theory has been later developed, speech that he thought a number of the concepts generated by the brain from random activation of neurons might be helpful. Hobson and McCarley tested cats to ascertain that areas of the brain were active throughout REM sleep. 2 active areas - the neural structure and therefore the RAS, structures that are concerned in movement inhibition throughout REM sleep. There are some weakness of activation-synthesis model of dreaming.

Weakness -Many people say they recognise components of their dreams from what happened in their lives. this suggests that the thoughts aren't as random because the theory suggests. When people apprehend they're dreaming, and it's been tested by measure devices. this concept doesn't work with the speculation, because it means that dreams are manageable and not random.