In: Accounting
QUESTION THREE
Treble Plc is planning to commence production of a new product – the Dom. It is expected that demand for the Dom will last for 6 years and that they will sell 1,000 units in the first year; 3,000 units in the second year and 6,000 units per year thereafter. The selling price will be ZMW15 per unit and the company wishes to achieve a mark-up of 50% on cost.
The following costs have been estimated:
Design and development ZMW 40,000
Variable production Cost: ZMW 7 per unit
Additional fixed production cost ZMW 4000 per year
End of life cost ZMW 10,000
Required
1 | ||||
Target cost per unit | ||||
Particulars | ZMW | |||
A | Selling price per unit | 15 | ||
B | Markup 50% on cost = 33.33% on selling price) | 5 | ||
Cost per unit (A-B) | 10 | |||
Therefore, Target cost is ZMW 10 per unit | ||||
2 | ||||
Actual production cost for the first year | ||||
Particulars | ZMW/ unit | Units | ZMW | |
Variable production cost | 7 | 1000 | 7,000 | |
Fixed production cost | 4000 | |||
Total production cost | 11,000 | |||
Production cost per unit (11,000/ 1000 units) | 11 | |||
Actual production cost per unit for the first year is ZMW 11. It
has exceeded the target cost by ZMW 1 per unit. Hence, the cost gap is ZMW 1 per unit. |
||||
3 | ||||
Life cycle cost per unit | ||||
Particulars | ZMW (A) | Units over the life of the product (B) |
ZMW/ unit (A)/(B) |
|
Research and Development costs | 40,000 | 28,000 | 1.43 | |
Variable production cost | 7 | |||
Fixed production cost(ZMW 4000 per * 6 years) | 24,000 | 28,000 | 0.86 | |
End of life cost | 10,000 | 28,000 | 0.36 | |
Life cycle cost per unit | 9.64 | |||
Note | ||||
Units over the life of the product | ||||
Year 1 | 1,000 | |||
Year 2 | 3,000 | |||
Year 3-6 | 24,000 | |||
Units over the life of the product | 28,000 | |||
From the workings it can be seen that the Life cycle cost per unit is less than the target cost by ZMW 0.36 per unit. Hence, no cost gap exists in this situation. |
4. Measures to close a cost gap:
1) Value Engineering Analysis - This involves analyzing activities
into valued and non-value added, thereby helping in eliminating
non-value added activities and contributing to cost
reduction.
2) Kaizen costing - This approach focuses on waste reduction in the
production phase and thereby would help in achieving the target
cost or even lower than the target.
3) Identify opportunities for cost reductions such as supplier
negotiations, target costing at research and development phase,
focusing on reducing costs of designing without compromizing the
utility of the product etc.
5. Benefits of target costing to modern day managers:
a. It is a dynamic approach that helps in cost reduction. Though
target costing helps maintain cost control, its focus is cost
reduction through methods such as VE and Kaizen costing.
b. By implementing systems such as VE and Kaizen costing, helps in
gaining a competitive advantage and the production process becomes
very efficient.
c. Helps in eliminating non value added activities, thereby
resulting in cost savings thereby helping the manager achieve the
goals and targets set
d. Helps in planning and making the managers aware of the
production requirements and the budget to be adhered to threby
assisting in better price negotiation with the suppliers.