Question

In: Economics

a) Suppose a tax on beans of $0.2 per can is levied on firms. As a...

a) Suppose a tax on beans of $0.2 per can is levied on firms. As a result of the tax, the equilibrium price increases from $0.4 to $0.5. What fraction of the incidence (tax burden) falls on consumers? On firms? Suppose the supply elasticity is 0.4. What must the demand elasticity be? (8 Points)

(b) If the demand function for orange juice is expressed as Q = 1000 − 400p, where Q is quantity in gallons and p is price per gallon measured in dollars. For what values of prices the demand for orange juice inelastic? (7 Points)

(c) Suppose demand and supply for a good is given by QD = 150 − 2P and QS = 50 + 23P. The government imposes a price oor of $3. What is the quantity bought and sold in the market. (7 Points)

(d) Leonardo is indierent between lahmacun and pizza. Lahmacun sells for $2 and pizza sells for $1 per serving. Assuming that Leonardo has a budget of $10. How will he spend it? Explain your answer by drawing Leonardo's budget line and indierence curves.(8 Points)

Solutions

Expert Solution

(a)

Given, tax on beans = 0.2

Because of the tax, the equilibrium price for the consumers increase from 0.4 to 0.5

This indicates that half of the burden of the tax i.e. $0.1 in this case - is borne by the consumers. Thus, the fraction of tax incidence on consumers = 1/2 or 50%

As a rule of thumb, tax incidence depends on the relative price elasticity of supply and demand i.e. when supply is more elastic than demand, consumers bear most of the tax burden. And when demand is more elastic than supply, producers bear most of the cost of the tax. However, when both the demand and supply have the same elasticity, the tax burden is borne equally by the consumers and producers.

Thus, the elasticity of supply = elasticity of demand = 0.4

Ans. Ed = 0.4

(b)

Given, demand equation, Q = 1000 - 400P

The demand for orange juice is said to be inelastic when e<1

where elasticity, E = dQ/dP. P/Q

= - (400). P/Q

For all values of Q, price should lie between 0 and 2.5 such that the elasticity of demand is inelastic.

Ans. 0<P<2.5

(c)

Given, demand Q = 150 - 2P and supply Q = 50 + 23P

In equiibrium, demand = supply

150 - 2P = 50 + 23P

Thus, 100 = 25P or P = 4

In equilibrium, Q = 142 and P = 4

At a binding price floor of P = 3, quantity demand, Q = 144 and quantity supplied, Q = 119

Thus, excess supply in the economy = 25 units

(d)

At a budget of M = $10, Leonardo's budget constraint is given by:

2L + 1P = 10

where L = Lahmacun and P = pizza

Given his budget constraint, Leonardo can spend his $10 on any of the following bundles:

(4,2) (3,4) (2,6) (1,8)

Since Leonardo is indifferent between Lahmacun and Pizza i.e. he derives equal utility from consuming both, hence he will choose the bundle with 1 unit of Lahmacun and 8 units of Pizza, since that maximizes his utility.

Maximum utility = 9 utils

Ans. 1 units of lahmacun and 8 units of pizza


Related Solutions

Suppose there is a $1.50 per unit tax levied on sellers
Consider the market below a. Suppose there is a $1.50 per unit tax levied on sellers. Draw the after-tax supply curve. Instructions: Use the tool provided (S2) to draw the after-tax supply curve. Be sure your endpoints are at Q = 0 and Q = 100 b. Plot the after-tax price paid by consumers and the after-tax price paid by sellers. Instructions: Use the tools provided to draw the after-tax price paid by consumers (After-tax Pc) and the after-tax price paid by...
Suppose there is a $15 per unit tax levied on sellers. Draw the after-tax supply curve.
Consider the market below a. Suppose there is a $15 per unit tax levied on sellers. Draw the after-tax supply curve. b. Plot the after-tax price received by consumers and the after-tax price paid by sellers.
A. Suppose a 10% tax is levied on the sale of sugary beverages. This tax is...
A. Suppose a 10% tax is levied on the sale of sugary beverages. This tax is collected from sellers of the drinks. A critic of the tax argues that sellers will shift the entire tax to buyers and therefore be no worse off. Evaluate this argument by explaining and illustrating (a graph) the market conditions that would have to prevail for the prediction to be correct. If the critic is correct, how successful will the tax be regarding decreasing obesity...
Cigarettes have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the...
Cigarettes have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this exam assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has increased considerably....
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this question assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this exam assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this exam assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this exam assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this exam assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied...
Cigarettes in Australia have long been subject to excise tax – a per cigarette tax levied on the suppliers of cigarettes. (The tax applies to all tobacco products, however for the purposes of this question assume cigarette and tobacco consumption are the same thing). In 2016 the federal government announced that the excise tax rate for cigarettes would rise by 12.5% a year for the next 4 years. Over this period tax revenue collected from the sale of cigarettes has...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT