Question

Debate:

Statement: "The State of California should significantly lower tuition prices for public universities”.

Pros and Cons

Answer 1

Pros are as below:

More Lower-Income Students Might Reach Graduation if There’s Tuition-Free College

Some students drop out because they do not have the ability to pay for tuition all four years. Making college tuition free would eliminate this reason for not graduating. This would also serve to improve college’s graduation rates, as fewer students would feel the need to drop to part-time status or take a break from education for financial reasons.

Student Debt Will No Longer Crush the Younger Generations

If a Canadian college student is able to graduate with less than $10,000 in student loan debt, they are considered lucky (the average is $37,000). However, students from other countries that have tuition free college have that luxury; most of their loans come from living expenses and books. Without the weight of student loan debt, more college graduates might buy houses rather than renting apartments. They might buy cars, spend more on healthy food, travel more: In essence, they could contribute more to the economy.

Students Might Have More Freedom to Choose a Major They Enjoy

Whether it is the influence of parents or knowing you need to pay loans back as quickly as possible, current students are often guided toward “practical” majors that have a more lucrative post-graduation income. If shelling out thousands upon thousands of dollars is no longer a factor, parents and students might feel more relaxed about studying for majors that don’t necessarily have a large paycheck associated with them. Interest and enjoyment from a field of study goes a long way in helping students stick with it and avoid burning out.

More People Would Go to College

By negating the large bill of a college education, we could see an increase in the amount of students able to attend college. This then creates a more well-educated workforce and a population that has better critical thinking skills. This could lead to more innovation in all areas of society.

Cons are as below:

The Money Has to Come From Somewhere

If Canada were to move to a tuition free college policy, where would the money come from? The short and simple answer is taxes. Who gets taxed seems to vary based on who is talking, but it seems certain that the upper echelons of Canadian society will see increased taxes if this passes. There is a likelihood that it will increase the upper middle-class as well.

Younger Generations Won’t Know How to Handle Finances

College is full of learning experiences, one of which is learning how creating a budget to save money. College loans are often the first major financial dealing that people work with. Paying them off in a timely manner proves you know how to budget your money, skills people use again and again when buying cars or houses. Without having to pay for school, that experience won’t exist, which might be trouble down the road for buying that house or car.

College Might Not Seem As Important

If higher education at public schools becomes free, it might appear to devalue a college degree.It might also lead to students cutting more classes or not trying because they don’t have to “get their money’s worth” when they aren’t paying for anything. The current price of college drives students to complete their schooling as quickly as possible so as to reduce debt. Without that financial drive, we might see more laziness and lackadaisical behavior from our students.

More People Would Go to College

As enrollment at public schools increases, so do the fees. Either more money would have to be given to the schools, or they would have to create waitlists. This means that the taxes for education-related purposes might go up, or funding for something else (such as military expenditures) might be diverted to pay the influx of fees. In addition to this, the large amount of graduates might oversaturate some areas of the workforce, leaving even more people with degrees working jobs that they are overqualified for.