Question

Compare and contrast relative and absolute ethics. Provide an example of each. Your response must be a minimum of 200 words in length.

Answer 1

Absolute ethics holds that in all situations something that is wrong is wrong regardless of the circumstances of a case. Relative ethics, conversely, have a different version; they believe that ethical values perception is different as indicated by societies and circumstances.

The contrasts between absolute ethics and relative ethics:

Absolute ethics is rigid in light of the fact that it just thinks about something morally wrong in every one of the societies, circumstances and every one of the situations. Relative ethics, then again, is flexible and agree that societal perceptions of what constitutes wrong is different and agree that something can be right in one society and wrong in another society.

Absolute ethics thinks about that rules or laws can never show signs of change despite any circumstances and in this manner something that is morally wrong will remain so however in relative ethics laws and rules are liable to change and that is the reason they are flexible.

Absolute ethics is intolerant on the grounds that it considers something wrong across all cultures yet cultures have differently believed. Relative ethics, interestingly, is tolerant in light of the fact that they believe that cultures have different norms of what is right and wrong and it is not same in all cultures.

The similarities between absolute ethics and relative ethics:

•           They both subscribe to morality issues

•           They both believe that there is something wrong and there is something right.

•           All go for guaranteeing that people act humany

•           Both bolster rules and laws

Make three models out of absolute ethics, and three instances of relative ethics, utilizing certifiable law enforcement situations.

Absolute ethics:

•           Shooting and killing of a blameless individual. At the point when law enforcement shoots and kills a honest individual, who was strolling on the road, resting on the share or driving on the highway.

•           Raping a woman who is in the police custody is so terrible. A law enforcement who capture a woman at night or amid the day and instead of taking the suspect into police custody he/she takes to a house or bramble are raped her.

•           Demanding of a reward by a law enforcement who finds a man stealing to abandon him/her is condemned in all societies. Such an act is entirely wrong across all cultures.

Relative ethics:

•           Law enforcement officers are seen working with a develop lady at night. Simply strolling in the streets while holding each is considered normal in some cultures yet abnormal n some cultures.

•           A law enforcement officer arresting a relative is who is driving while drunk. That is seen to be okay in some cultures however condemned in some cultures.

•           A law enforcement that stays with a lady who is not married legitimately but rather is an adult remaining together. That is considered to be okay in some cultures and wrong in some cultures.