In efforts to tackle drug related crimes, the government could crack down the supply of drug...

In efforts to tackle drug related crimes, the government could crack down the supply of drug or could focus on the demand side by educating users. Discuss which approach is more effective and make sure to support your analysis with the appropriate diagrams. SHORT ANSWER PLEASE!

Expert Solution

As we all know that drugs are much being used by the youth to middle-aged people in every country.

It has been seen that these addictions lead to bigger crimes and mistakes. We all have witnessed lots of murder in the essence of drugs. From male to female this drug's usage has been consequently increased. This has been a threat to the humanity and could possibly destroy human life. The most dangerous fact is that its spread all across the world from ameraca to asian countries.

The question arises is that how to stop this act of drugs. Two possible ways

Track down the drug's source and destroy.
Convince people by giving the necessary classes and pieces of advice.

The fact is that the second method that suggested could possibly never happen. The people are much arrogant and stern on their mind sets. They will never change their minds unless they realize by their own that it is dangerous. 90% of humen character is like that. Once they get used to something, nothing can change their lifestyle. In that way it is a good alternative to set up a team by the government to track down the source of drugs and destroy it. But the problem is that this could possibly increase the demand for drugs and more sources starts to develop. In either way it is bit hard to come up with a good solution which the destruction of supply is th better one among it.

Hope this helps

Thanks

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Drug law enforcers can concentrate their efforts on reducing supply or demand, removing suppliers or removing...

Drug law enforcers can concentrate their efforts on reducing supply or demand, removing suppliers or removing demanders. a. Assuming that your goal is to raise the price of drugs to a prohibitive level, should you pursue suppliers or users? What does your answer assume about elasticities of demand and supply? b. If instead you want simply to reduce consumption and are uninterested in what happens to price, under what assumptions about elasticities should you target users rather than sellers? Please...

To increase the money supply, the Fed could A. sell government bonds. B. decrease the...

To increase the money supply, the Fed could A. sell government bonds. B. decrease the discount rate. C. increase the reserve requirement. D. None of the above is correct. In recent years the Federal Open Market Committee has focused on a target for A. M1 growth. B. the federal funds rate. C. the number of Treasury Securities issued by the federal government. D. total reserves of banks.

11) If the government wanted to reduce unemployment using supply side policy it could A) Decrease...

11) If the government wanted to reduce unemployment using supply side policy it could A) Decrease the money supply B) Increase unemployment benefits C) Lower government spending on the infrastructure D) Improve labour skills through training E) Raise interest rates 12) Calculate the value of the multiplier where C = 25 + 0.75Y A) 4 B) 25 C) 0.75 D) 0.25 E) 25.75 13) A total ban on trade with another country is known as A) An export restraint B)...

This question is related to Government Intervention: (Quotas): Consider the following supply and demand curves: Demand:...

This question is related to Government Intervention: (Quotas): Consider the following supply and demand curves: Demand: P=150-3Qd-.5I-Pj Supply : P=2Qs+.25L Suppose income, I, is 60, the price of good j, Pj, is 0, and L, the cost of labor, is 120. Using this information, solve for the equilibrium price and quantity. Suppose now that the government introduces a price floor of 90 when income, I, is 60, the price of good j, Pj, is 0, and L, the cost of...

1. Which of the following is considered a negative supply shock? Select one: a. Government-mandated shut-down...

1. Which of the following is considered a negative supply shock? Select one: a. Government-mandated shut-down of the retail sector to prevent a spread of a virus b. A decline in wages c. An unexpected large increase in the government bond yields d. An improvement in video-conferencing technology 2. An Australian firm produces software in the UK, its market value will be included in Select one: a. Australia’s GDP. b. neither Australia’s nor UK’s GDP as it is counted towards...

Question