Question

In: Operations Management

For AT&T: What is your organizations principal business-level strategy: low cost or differentiation? How successfully is...

For AT&T: What is your organizations principal business-level strategy: low cost or differentiation? How successfully is the organization pursuing this strategy? In what ways does it need to improve its core competences to improve its competitive position?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The organization which has been taken into consideration for this answer is AT&T. This organization is based in America and it is a conglomerate organization.

This organization has adopted a differentiation business strategy and this strategy is considered to be the principal strategy of the organization.

The main objective of the initiation of this strategy is to gain a competitive advantage. The organization has focused on collaborating with Apple to sell the products of Apple. This has been done by AT&T to align the differentiation strategy with its operation.

In today's business world it can be seen that competition in each and every sector is increasing at an alarming rate. This is the reason AT&T has to adopt strategies that can help the organization to increase the competency of the operation and also help the organization to gain a competitive advantage. Innovation in the operation within the organization is of utmost importance to improve the core competency of the organization. Experts within the organization should focus on the unique capabilities of research in the organization. This can increase the efficiency of the business organization and increase the performance of the employees within the organization.


Related Solutions

How can a business-level strategy of (a) low cost and (b) differentiation offer some protection against...
How can a business-level strategy of (a) low cost and (b) differentiation offer some protection against competitive forces in a company’s industry?
How can a business-level strategy of (a) low cost and (b) differentiation offer some protection against...
How can a business-level strategy of (a) low cost and (b) differentiation offer some protection against competitive forces in a company’s industry
What is the Business Level Strategy (i.e. cost leader, differentiation, focus) of Nestle?
What is the Business Level Strategy (i.e. cost leader, differentiation, focus) of Nestle?
According to Michael Porter, organizations cannot simultaneously pursue both a low-cost business level strategy and a...
According to Michael Porter, organizations cannot simultaneously pursue both a low-cost business level strategy and a differentiation business level strategy. Illustrate why.
a)       When should a company go for Low-Cost strategy instead of Differentiation strategy? (9 marks) b)      How...
a)       When should a company go for Low-Cost strategy instead of Differentiation strategy? b)      How a company will benefit from the Differentiation strategy? (8 Mark) c)      What are the major risks involved in the execution of Focus strategies and how a company can mitigate those risks? (8 Mark)
Compare and contrast a low-cost generic strategy with a differentiation generic strategy. Use examples from the...
Compare and contrast a low-cost generic strategy with a differentiation generic strategy. Use examples from the airlines or manufacturing industries to highlight the trade-offs that need to be made in order to achieve a sustainable advantages.
How does differentiation, cost leadership, and integration support a forward-looking business strategy?
How does differentiation, cost leadership, and integration support a forward-looking business strategy?
Why would you choose Broad Differentiation Strategy to competing successfully and making profit in your own...
Why would you choose Broad Differentiation Strategy to competing successfully and making profit in your own company? Explain shortcomings (pitfalls) to avoid.
GM's business-level strategy is arguably Low-Cost Leadership (as is Ford's). In most categories of vehicle, GM...
GM's business-level strategy is arguably Low-Cost Leadership (as is Ford's). In most categories of vehicle, GM and Ford are the standard, low cost and usually lower priced, alternatives to comparable premium products from Mercedes, BMW, and others. SAAB's pre-GM business-level strategy was Differentiation as were the other non-American car companies purchased by GM and Ford in the 1980s and 1990s. Why were GM and Ford unable to successfully manage these foreign high-end car companies?
What business strategy you will recommend for a business in which pressure for product differentiation is...
What business strategy you will recommend for a business in which pressure for product differentiation is high? Discuss.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT