Question

In: Operations Management

please read chapter vi discussing global trade theory and the WSJ article ( Feb20/18 beginning"Asian" concerning...

please read chapter vi discussing global trade theory and the WSJ article ( Feb20/18 beginning"Asian" concerning Chinese companies that are grabbing market share in the Indian market from Apple and Samsung. In your opinion how should these firms respond to this challenge ?

Solutions

Expert Solution

India is a growing economy that is seeing a huge growth in the middle-class segment of the market. People want products that are high on features and have a reasonable pricing. The Chinese products realized this and came up with smartphones are affordable and gave the same features that an iPhone or a Samsung high-end phone would give. Samsung and Apple continued to remain as the premium brands in the Indian market but it backfired as the people started moving towards brands like Xiaomi, Vivo, and Oppo. These brands acquired the market share became a household name in a few years. So the best way to tackle this problem for Apple and Samsung would be to create a new line of products that affordable to buy and also have all the latest features. The one product for all the markets strategy will not work for the Indian market. The companies can take this risk because the population of the country is more than 1.2 billion and the demand for the smartphones is still growing in the market. They need to change their pricing strategy and become more pocket-friendly for the Indian customers. Some of the Indian brands are doing the same and have been quite successful as well. The companies need to attract the people first in order to acquire market share in India. The reason is the Indian population is always ready to try new products and support the brands that deliver value for money. The companies cannot be negligent just because they are market leaders and they need to put in efforts to understand the Indian market well. They can do this by having manufacturing units in the country so that they can do cost cutting and provide products a lower price. Only this can help these two companies in tackling the competition from the Chinese companies in the Indian market.


Related Solutions

please read chpt 14 discussing global HR policy and then read the WSJ article contrasting the...
please read chpt 14 discussing global HR policy and then read the WSJ article contrasting the personnel practices of Hasbro and Mattel. (WSJ SatApril 14/18 p.B2 beginning"Toy' .What impact would have their very different approaches to production and overall personnel policies have on  overall company performance ?
Chapter 3 concludes with an article titled "Sustainability, ROA, and the Golden Rule." Please read that...
Chapter 3 concludes with an article titled "Sustainability, ROA, and the Golden Rule." Please read that article and discuss why it may be profitable in the long-term to operate a firm in a sustainable manner. Give examples of sustainability practices being used in industry today and discuss their profitability or lack thereof. The article: "Sustainability, ROA, and the Golden Rule” Perhaps “sustainability” isn't the first word that comes to mind when someone thinks about the garbage business. However, today's waste...
Please read D. Armentano's article, "A Critique of Neoclassical and Austrian Monopoly Theory," and respond to...
Please read D. Armentano's article, "A Critique of Neoclassical and Austrian Monopoly Theory," and respond to the following prompts. In the article, the author brings up a few important issues with the way economists treat monopoly. Compare and contrast the four different treatments of monopoly presented (Neoclassical, Mises, Kirzner, and Rothbard). Is it appropriate to consider barriers to entry that are due to consumer preferences?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT