Question

In: Accounting

Instructions:You need to show your clear calculation to support each statement provide a paragraph of interpretation...

Instructions:You need to show your clear calculation to support each statement provide a paragraph of interpretation related to the result of your analysis on each statement.

Comparative Analysis for balance sheet:

2011

2010

Difference

% changed

ASSETS:

Current Assets

Cash and equivalents

$ 2,291.1

$ 2,133.9

Short-term investments

   1,164.2

      642.2

Account receivable

   2,883.9

   2,795.3

Inventory

   2,357.0

   2,438.4

Prepaid expenses and other assets

      765.6

      602.3

Deferred income taxes, net

     272.4

      227.2

Total Current Assets

$ 9,734.0

$ 8,839.3

Property and equipment, gross

   4,255.7

   4,103.0

Accumulated depreciation

(2,221.9)

(2,298.0)

Property and equipment, net

$ 1,957.7

$ 1,891.1

Identifiable intangible assets

      467.4

      743.1

Good will

      193.5

      448.8

Deferred income taxes and other assets

      897.0

      520.4

Total Assets

$13,249.6

$12,442.7

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current Liability :

Current portion of long-term debt

$        32.0

$          6.3

Note Payable

        342.9

         177.7

Account Payable

     1,031.9

      1,287.6

Accrued liabilities

     1,783.9

      1,761.9

Income taxes payable

          86.3

           88.0

Total Current Liabilities

$   3,277.0

$    3,321.5

Long term debt

        437.2

         441.1

Deferred taxes and other long-term liabilities

        842.0

         854.5

Total Liabilities

$ 4,556.2

$ 4,617.1

Redeemable preferred stock

$         0.3

$         0.3

Common Shareholders’ Equity

Common stock

           2.8

           2.8

Capital in excess of stated value

$ 2,781.4

$ 2,497.8

Retained earnings

    5,451.4

   5,073.3

Accumulated other comprehensive income

       367.5

      251.4

Total Common Shareholders’ Equity

$ 8,693.1

$ 7,825.3

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

$13,249.6

$12,442.7

Solutions

Expert Solution

Comparative Analysis for balance sheet:

2011

2010

Difference

% Change

ASSETS:

Current Assets

Cash and Equivalents

$2,291.10

$2,133.90

$157.20

7.40%

Short-term investments

$1,164.20

$642.20

$522

81.30%

Accounts Receivable

$2,883.90

$2,795.30

$88.60

3.17%

Inventory

$2,357

$2,438.40

($81.40)

-3.33%

Prepaid Expenses and other Assets

$765.60

$602.30

$163.30

27.11%

Deferred income taxes, net

$272.40

$227.20

$45.20

19.90%

Total Current Assets

9,734

8,839.30

$894.70

10.12%

Property and Equipment, gross

$4,255.70

$4,103.00

$152.70

3.72%

Accumulated Depreciation

($2,221.90)

($2,298)

($76.10)

-3.33%

Property and Equipment, net

$1,957.70

$1,891.10

$66.60

3.52%

Identifiable intangible assets

$467.40

$743.10

($275.70)

-37.10%

Goodwill

$193.50

$448.80

($255.30)

-56.89%

Deferred income taxes and other assets

$897.00

$520.40

$376.60

72.34%

Total Assets

$13,249.60

$12,442.70

$806.90

6.48%

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current Liabilities:

Current portion of long-term debt

$32

$6.30

$25.70

408%

Note Payable

$342.90

$177.70

$165.20

92.97%

Account Payable

$1,031.90

$1,287.60

($255.70)

-19.86%

Accrued Liabilities

$1,783.90

$1,761.90

$22

1.20%

Income Taxes Payable

$86.30

$88

($1.70)

-1.93%

Total Current Liabilities

$3,277

$3,321.50

$44.50

-1.33%

Long term debt

$437.20

$441.10

($3.90)

-0.88%

Deferred taxes and other long term liabilities

$842.00

$854.50

($12.50)

-1.46%

Total Liabilities

$4,556.20

$4,617.10

($60.90)

-1.32%

Redeemable Preferred Stock

$0.30

$0.30

$0.00

0.00%

Common Shareholders' Equity

Common Stock

$2.80

$2.80

$0.00

0.00%

Capital in excess of stated value

$2,781.40

$2,497.80

$283.60

11.35%

Retained Earnings

$5,451.40

$5,073.30

$378.10

7.45%

Accumulated other comprehensive income

$367.50

$251.40

$116.10

46.18%

Total common shareholders' Equity

$8,693.10

$7,825.30

$867.80

11.10%

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

$13,249.60

$12,442.70

$806.90

6.48%


Related Solutions

Instructions:: You need to show your clear calculation to support each statement provide a paragraph of...
Instructions:: You need to show your clear calculation to support each statement provide a paragraph of interpretation related to the result of your analysis on each statement. Question 1: Common size for income statement Income Statement (Common Size) :                                                                  Consolidated Income Statement 2011 % 2010 % Revenue $19,176.1 $18,627.0    Cost of sales ( 10,571.7) ( 10,239.6 ) Gross Profit      8,604.4     8,387.4 Selling and administrative expenses (   6,149.6) ( 5,953.7) Restructuring charges (      195.0)       0.0 Goodwill...
Please answer questions 1-4. You need to show your clear calculation to support each statement provide...
Please answer questions 1-4. You need to show your clear calculation to support each statement provide a paragraph of interpretation related to the result of your analysis on each statement. I can't award credit if all questions and instructions are not answered. Question 1: Common size for income statement Income Statement (Common Size) :                                                                  Consolidated Income Statement 2011 % 2010 % Revenue $19,176.1 $18,627.0    Cost of sales ( 10,571.7) ( 10,239.6 ) Gross Profit      8,604.4     8,387.4...
Do you favor the Copenhagen interpretation or the Everett interpretation? Why? Give details to support your...
Do you favor the Copenhagen interpretation or the Everett interpretation? Why? Give details to support your answer.
Hi Please be clear with your handwriting and show steps. label the answer. Provide a description...
Hi Please be clear with your handwriting and show steps. label the answer. Provide a description of the advantages and disadvantages of these various anemometer types Cup Anemometer Paddle/Vane Anemometer Ultrasonic Anemometer Hot-Wire Anemometer
provide a clear distinction between horizontal FDI and Vertical FDI. Support your answer by providing real...
provide a clear distinction between horizontal FDI and Vertical FDI. Support your answer by providing real examples for both Horizontal and Vertical FDI
provide a clear distinction between horizontal FDI and Vertical FDI. Support your answer by providing real...
provide a clear distinction between horizontal FDI and Vertical FDI. Support your answer by providing real examples for both Horizontal and Vertical FDI (long answer)
Required Prepare a cash flow statement for 2014 with clear documentation (i.e., show your work) for...
Required Prepare a cash flow statement for 2014 with clear documentation (i.e., show your work) for each section of the statement.  Use either the direct or the indirect method. Additional information 1.There were no write-offs of delinquent accounts during the year. 2.A building was sold during the year for $120. V. (continued) Comparative balance sheets and an income statement for 2014 are presented below for Nroklesah Company. Nroklesah Company Comparative Balance Sheets and Income Statement For the Years 2013 and 2014...
Analyze the statement and provide examples to support your answer. Entrepreneurs are born, not made
Analyze the statement and provide examples to support your answer. Entrepreneurs are born, not made
For each problem test the significance the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Show your calculation of the...
For each problem test the significance the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Show your calculation of the test statistic rs. Please show work so i understand how to do it! Exercise 1. Defense and wins. The data in the table below shows the wining percentage and the yards per game allowed in the 2014-15 season for a random sampling of teams. At α = 0.05, can you support the claim that there is a correlation between the winning percentage and the...
For each problem test the significance the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Show your calculation of the...
For each problem test the significance the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Show your calculation of the test statistic rs. Exercise 2. Income and commute time. The table below shows the median income ($1000s) and commuter times (minutes) for a random sample of 6 different places. At α = 0.05, can you reject the claim that there is no correlation between median income and commuting distance? City Family income Commute time Woodridge, Illinois 83 27.1 Urbandale, Idaho 82 17.0 La Palma,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT