In: Math
Assume that the average volume of raindrops globally is normally distributed with mean 0.45 ml and variance 0.01 ml2. Michael measures the volume of two raindrop at Rainyville as 0.65 ml and 0.75 ml; and comes to believe that the raindrops at Rainyville are significantly larger than the global average at the 5% level.
If Michael performs the appropriate statistical test, what will be his conclusion?
1. reject the null hypothesis or 2. fail to reject the null hypothesis?
given data are
population mean =0.45 ml
population variance =0.01ml^2
then = =0.1
sample n =2
sample mean =
=(.65+.75)/2
= 1.4/2= 0.70 ml
null hypothesis H0: - =0.45
alternative hypothesis Ha: - 0.45
level of significance =0.05
test statistic: - z=
z=(0.7-0.45)/(0.1/)
= 0.25/0.0707
= 3.5355
decision rule:- at 5% level in 1tail from z table zcri= 1.645
reject H0 if zcal>1.645
decision: - zcal>1.645
so reject the null hypothesis H0
conclusion: - at 5% level their is sufficient evidence to support the claim that " the raindrops at rainyville are significantly larger than the global average "