Question

In: Accounting

The XYZ Company’s current production processes have a scrap rate of 15% and a return rate...

The XYZ Company’s current production processes have a scrap rate of 15% and a return rate of 3%. Scrap costs (wasted materials) are $12 per unit; warranty/repair costs average $60 per unit returned. The company is considering the following alternatives to improve its production processes:

  • Option A: Invest $400,000 in new equipment. The new process will also require an additional $1.50 of raw materials per unit produced. This option is predicted to reduce both scrap and return rates by 40% from current levels.
  • Option B: Invest $50,000 in new equipment but spend an additional $3.20 on higher-quality raw materials per unit produced. This option is predicted to reduce both scrap and return rates by 90% from current levels.
  • Option C: Invest $2 million in new equipment. The new process will require no change in raw materials. This option is predicted to reduce both scrap and return rates by 50% from current levels.

Required

  1. Assume that current production levels of 1 million units will continue. Which option do you recommend? Why?
  2. Assume that all of the proposed changes will increase product quality such that production will jump to 1.5 million units. Which option do you recommend? Why?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. Recommended option

Calculation for investment as follows: Following formula is used to calculate investment:

Investment = Amount to be invested + Scrap rate + Current production units (1) Substitute the "invested amount', "scrap rate" and "units" for current production in the Equation (1) is given below:

Investment = $400,000 + $1.5 x 1,000,000 units

= $1,900,000

Therefore, the investment for option A is $1,900,000

Calculation for savings as follows: Following formulas are used to calculate savings:

Savings = Reduced scrap costs + Reduced warranty/ repair costs (2)

Reducedscrap costs = Reduced scrap rate x Scrap rate x Scrap cost x Production unit

Reduced scrap costs = 40% x 15% x $12 x 1,000,000 units

= $720,000

Repair costs = Reduced scrap rate x return rate x repair cost x Production unit

Reduced warranty/ repair costs = 40% x 3% x $60 x 1,000,000 units

= $720,000

Substitute the "Reduced scrap costs" and "Repair costs" in the Equation (2) is given below:

Savings = $720,000+$720,000 = $41,440,000
Therefore, the savings for option A is $41,440,000

(b).

Following formula is used to calculate investment:

Calculation for investment as follows:
Substitute the invested amount, additional amount and units for current production in the Equation (1) is given below:

Investment = $50,000 + $3.2 x 1,000,000 units

= $3,250,000

Therefore, the investment for option B is $3,250,000
Calculation for savings as follows: Following formulas are used to calculate savings:

Reducedscrap costs = Reduced scrap rate x Scrap rate x Scrap cost x Production unit

Reduced scrap costs = 90% x 15% x $12 x 1,000,000 units

= $1,620,000

Repair costs = Reduced scrap rate x return rate x repair cost x Production unit

Reduced warranty/repair costs = 90% x 3% x $60 x 1,000,000 units

= $1,620,000

Substitute the "Reduced scrap costs" and "Repair costs" in the Equation (2) is given below:

Savings =$1,620,000+$1,620,000 =$3,240,000
Therefore, the savings for option B is $3,240,000

(c)

Following formula is used to calculate investment:
Calculation for investment as follows:

Investment = Amount to be invested

Substitute the invested amount using the above formula.

Investment = $2,000,000

Therefore, the investment for option C is $2,000,000

Calculation for savings as follows:

Following formulas are used to calculate savings:

Reducedscrap costs = Reduced scrap rate x Scrap rate x Scrap cost x Production unit

Reduced scrap costs = 50% x 15% x $12 x 1,000,000 units

= $900,000

Repair costs = Reduced scrap rate x return rate x repair cost x Production unit

Reduced warranty/repair costs = 50% x 3% x $60 x 1,000,000 units

= $900,000

Substitute the "Reduced scrap costs" and "Repair costs" in the Equation (2) is given below: Savings = $9000,000+$9000,000 = $1,800,000
Therefore, the savings for option B is $1,800,000
Conclusion:
Thus, the continuation of 1,000,000 units in the production level, the total cost is not reduced by any other options. But, option "B's" total cost is increased in some level. So, the option B is recommended.

b. Recommended option:

Option A:

Following formula is used to calculate investment:

Calculation for investment as follows:

Substitute the invested amount, scrap rate and units for current production in the Equation (1) is given below:

Investment = $400,000 + $1.5 x 1,500,000 units

= $2,650,000

Calculation for savings as follows:

Following formulas are used to calculate savings:

Reducedscrap costs = Reduced scrap rate x Scrap rate x Scrap cost x Production unit

Reduced scrap costs = 40% x 15% x $12 x 1,500,000 units

= $1,080,000

Repair costs = Reduced scrap rate x return rate x repair cost x Production unit

Reduced warranty/repair costs = 40% x 3% x $60 x 1,500,000 units

= $1,0800,000

Substitute the "Reduced scrap costs" and "Repair costs" in the Equation (2) is given below:

Savings = $1,0800,000+$1,0800,000 = $2,160,000
Therefore, the savings for option A is $2,160,000


Option B:

Following formula is used to calculate investment:

Calculation for investment as follows:
Substitute the invested amount, additional amount and units for current production in the Equation (1) is given below:

Investment = S50,000 + S3.2 x 1,500,000 units

= S4,850,000

Therefore, the investment for option B is $4,850,000.

Calculation for savings as follows:

Following formulas are used to calculate savings:

Reducedscrap costs = Reduced scrap rate x Scrap rate x Scrap cost x Production unit

Reduced scrap costs = 90% x 15% x $12 x 1,500,000 units

= $2,430,000

Repair costs = Reduced scrap rate x return rate x repair cost x Production unit

Reduced warranty/repair costs = 90% x 3% x $60 x 1,500,000 units

= $2,430,000

Substitute the "Reduced scrap costs" and "Repair costs" in the Equation (2) is given below: Savings = $2,430,000+$2,430,000 = $4,860,000
Therefore, the savings for option B is $4,860,000

Option C:

Following formula is used to calculate investment:

Calculation for investment as follows:
Investment = Amount to be invested

Substitute the invested amount using the above formula.
Investment = $2,000,000

Therefore, the investment for option B is $2,000,000

Calculation for savings as follows:

Following formulas are used to calculate savings:

Reducedscrap costs = Reduced scrap rate x Scrap rate x Scrap cost x Production unit

Reduced scrap costs = 50% x 15% x $12 x 1,500,000 units

= $1,350,000

Repair costs = Reduced scrap rate x return rate x repair cost x Production unit

Reduced warranty/repair costs = 50% x 3% x $60 x 1,500,000 units

= $1,350,000

Substitute the "Reduced scrap costs" and "Repair costs" in the Equation (2) is given below: Savings = $1,350,000+$1,350,000 = $2,700,000
Therefore, the savings for option B is $2,700,000

Conclusion:
Thus, the changes will increase the quality of the product. So, the production will jump into of 1,500,000 units in the production level.

Here option "B" and "C" both reduces the total cost. But option "C" reduce the total cost little bit
higher. Therefore, the 'option C is recommended.


Related Solutions

Investors require a 15% rate of return on Levine company’s stock (that is, ????= 15%). (1)...
Investors require a 15% rate of return on Levine company’s stock (that is, ????= 15%). (1) What is its value if the previous dividend (??0 ) was $2, and investors expect dividends to grow at a constant rate of (ⅰ) -5%, (ⅱ) 0%, or (ⅲ) 5%? (2) Using data from part (1) (??0=$2), what would the Gordon (constant growth) model value be if the required rate of return was 15% and the expected growth rate was 20%? Is this a...
The current market rate of return is 12% and the risk-free rate is 4%. You have...
The current market rate of return is 12% and the risk-free rate is 4%. You have been given the job of determining your firm's cost of capital components. The company has 1 million shares outstanding with a current value of $22.50 per share. The debt represents 30% of the capital structure and the yield to maturity is 12%. The beta of the equity is 1.4 and the tax rate is 30%. a. What is the market value of firm and...
A company’s bonds have a 15-year maturity, a 6% coupon rate paid semi-annually, and a par...
A company’s bonds have a 15-year maturity, a 6% coupon rate paid semi-annually, and a par value of $1000. The nominal yield is quoted as 6% in the financial press. What is the bond’s price?
The minimum rate of return is a function of a company’s Multiple Choice all of the...
The minimum rate of return is a function of a company’s Multiple Choice all of the above. available bank interest rates. corporate or industry return on investment. cost of capital. Performance measures used in balanced scorecards typically fall into all of the following categories except: Multiple Choice Financial. Internal business processes. Sustainability measures. Customer. Which of the following is a characteristic of management accounting? Multiple Choice Management accounting must observe both financial accounting standards and cost accounting standards if it...
The current riskfree rate is 4% and the expected rate of return on the market portfolio...
The current riskfree rate is 4% and the expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 10%. The Brandywine Corporation has two divisions of equal market value. The debt to equity ratio (D/E) is 3/7. The company’s debt can be assumed to present no risk of default. For the last few years, the Brandy division has been using a discount rate of 12% in capital budgeting decisions and the Wine division a discount rate of 10%. You have been...
if the stock price is 100$ and return rate is 15%. then what would be the...
if the stock price is 100$ and return rate is 15%. then what would be the initial price to expected rate of return ratio?
The current market price of a security is $50, the security's expected return is 15%, the...
The current market price of a security is $50, the security's expected return is 15%, the riskless rate of interest is 2%, and the market risk premium is 8%. What is the beta of the security? What is the covariance of returns on this security with the returns on the market portfolio? What will be the security's price, if the covariance of its rate of return with the market portfolio doubles? How is your result consistent with our understanding that...
The current market price of a security is $50, the security's expected return is 15%, the...
The current market price of a security is $50, the security's expected return is 15%, the riskless rate of interest is 2%, and the market risk premium is 8%. What is the beta of the security? What is the covariance of returns on this security with the returns on the market portfolio? What will be the security's price, if the covariance of its rate of return with the market portfolio doubles? How is your result consistent with our understanding that...
Consider the rate of return of stocks ABC and XYZ. Year rABC rXYZ 1 22 %...
Consider the rate of return of stocks ABC and XYZ. Year rABC rXYZ 1 22 % 28 % 2 8 11 3 10 19 4 3 1 5 1 −15 a. Calculate the arithmetic average return on these stocks over the sample period. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) b. Which stock has greater dispersion around the mean return? XYZ ABC c. Calculate the geometric average returns of each stock. What do you conclude?...
Assume that the risk-free rate of interest is 5% and the expected rate of return on the market is 15%
Assume that the risk-free rate of interest is 5% and the expected rate of return on the market is 15%. I am buying a firm with an expected perpetual cash flow of $1,000 but am unsure of its risk. If I think the beta of the firm is 0.3, when in fact the beta is really 0.6, how much more will I offer for the firm than it is truly worth? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT