Question

In: Operations Management

Business law question The Ewells bought a home in Seaford, Delaware. They planned to renovate it...

Business law question

The Ewells bought a home in Seaford, Delaware. They planned to renovate it and reside in it later. The Ewells insured the house with an insurance company, Lloyd's of London. Shortly after purchasing the house, the Ewells notified the insurance company that it intended to renovate the house. The insurance company thereupon issued a Special Use Form Policy that contained a single-page "Course of Construction! Renovation Endorsement." The Fire Provision of the Endorsement stated: In the event of any construction or renovation work at the premises desclibed in the Declarations the following conditions shall apply: You must ensure that visible and accessible fire extinguishers be placed on each level of the dwelling. Failure to comply with this provision will render this insurance null and void. The Ewells did not place any fire extinguishers in the house. The work on the house proceeded with the removal of plaster and gutting of the kitchen and another room. In the early morning hours of January 20, 2009, the house and its contents were destroyed by fire. At the time of the fire, the Ewells were sleeping in a shed that they had built in the back yard rather than in the house. They were awakened by the arrival of fire trucks. The Ewells informed the insurance company of the fire, and it assigned an adjuster to investigate the loss. The insurance company ultimately denied the claim because the Ewells had not complied with the condition requiring them to place fire extinguishers on each floor of the house, as required by the Endorsement. The Ewells sued the insurance company for breach of contract. They argued that the fire extinguisher provision was meaningless because no one was in the house at the time of the fire, so no one could have used a fire extinguisher if there had been one present. They also argue that the condition was not triggered because the work that they were in the process of doing was demolition and they had not yet begun renovation.

a). Will they win?

b). Should conditions be strictly enforced? Why or Why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer A-

No - because the logic given by them is not correct. If no one is in the house then it can not be an excuse for the given condition of the insurance company. Also demolition is a part of the renovation process and hence I think this would not be concluded in the favour of the insured.

Answer B -

Yes, strict conditions should be imposed for factors such as fire specifically. If not imposed and ignored, it can spread to many miles and do the damage unbelievable to the mind. Also fire safety should be utmost priority as it can do damage to the nearby areas as well. So for the safety of people and nearby areas, it is recommended to have such strict rules in place which should govern to lesser damages. Recent 2019 Bushfire of Australia is such a case where the wildlife was severely affected along with humans.

So yes it should be strictly implemented to use safety gear while doing renovation.


Related Solutions

BUSINESS LAW (critical thinking legal question) Proffesional products, inc. (PPI), bought three pallets of computer wafers...
BUSINESS LAW (critical thinking legal question) Proffesional products, inc. (PPI), bought three pallets of computer wafers from Omneon Video Graphics. (A computer wafer is a thin, round slice of silicon from which microchips are made) Omneon agreed to ship the wafers to the City University of New York “FOB Omneon’s dock”. Shipment was arranged through Haas Industries, Inc. The “conditions of carriage” on the back of the bill of lading stated that Haas’s liability for lost goods was limited to...
home / study / business / accounting / accounting questions and answers / hartford hospital bought...
home / study / business / accounting / accounting questions and answers / hartford hospital bought a new x-ray machine at the beginning of the year at a cost of $34,500. ... Your question has been answered Let us know if you got a helpful answer. Rate this answer Question: Hartford Hospital bought a new x-ray machine at the beginning of the year at a cost of $34,500. T... Hartford Hospital bought a new x-ray machine at the beginning of...
*Please respond in essay format, Subject: Business Law* Hedda Hornet planned on attending her High School...
*Please respond in essay format, Subject: Business Law* Hedda Hornet planned on attending her High School Promon the evening of June 23rd, 1990. On May 15th, Hedda entered Paula's Gown Shop to select a prom dress. Hedda wanted a "designer" label dress. Paulacarried the following "designer" labels: Kalvin Klein, Gloria Anderburg, Robby Brooks, and Guido. Hedda tried on one of each label and finally settled on Guido. Hedda gave Paula the exact measurements and Paula ordered the "designer" Guido. Paula...
The Pine Ridge Reservation, which is larger than Delaware and Rhode Island combined, is home to...
The Pine Ridge Reservation, which is larger than Delaware and Rhode Island combined, is home to Sioux. It is one of the poorest places in America, with about 98% of residents below the poverty level and a life expectancy of 48 for men and 52 for women. According to Feir, Gillezeau and Jones why are the Sioux Indians among the poorest in the nation?
compare and contrast sole proprietorship and partnership form of business its a business law question
compare and contrast sole proprietorship and partnership form of business its a business law question
The ABC Company bought a new machine on October 1, 2014 for $110,000. It planned to...
The ABC Company bought a new machine on October 1, 2014 for $110,000. It planned to keep the truck for four years at which time it expected to sell the truck for $30,000. The company elected to amortize the truck for financial reporting purposes using the declining balance method with an annual rate of 30%. The company has a December 31 year-end and a corporate income tax rate of 40%. For tax reporting purposes, you may pick one of the...
The subject is BUSINESS LAW and the question is stated below: Discuss the terms that make...
The subject is BUSINESS LAW and the question is stated below: Discuss the terms that make an advertisement "so specific and definite" that a reasonable person would believe they accepted the contract when they purchase/complete the condition of the advertisement? (In your answer, state whether or not you agree with the court and give examples)
This is a business Law question. Explain the liability of bailees for lost damaged, or destroyed...
This is a business Law question. Explain the liability of bailees for lost damaged, or destroyed goods?
Business Law question: Your business is being sued by Emily, a former employee, who claims that...
Business Law question: Your business is being sued by Emily, a former employee, who claims that she was sexually harassed by one of your other employees, Frank. Your business has a written employee policy manual that makes it clear that sexual harassment will not be tolerated at your workplace. It also designates one of your other female employees, Sarah, as the designated reporting person for reporting any incidents sexual harassment. Frank admits that one day, he flirted with Emily, and...
home / study / business / finance / finance questions and answers / question 11 the...
home / study / business / finance / finance questions and answers / question 11 the taxing and spending policies of the federal government designed to promote ... Question: QUESTION 11 The taxing and spending policies of the Federal Government designed to promote nati... Edit question QUESTION 11 The taxing and spending policies of the Federal Government designed to promote national ecomomic goals are known as "fiscal policy." True False 3 points    QUESTION 12 Most states exempt their own...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT