Question

In: Accounting

A) Describe the following approaches to adjusting the value of transactions for tax purposes in a...

A) Describe the following approaches to adjusting the value of transactions for tax purposes in a transfer pricing environment:

Cost plus approach                                    

Profit split approach                                   

Resale price approach                     

B) Discuss six challenges faced by tax policy makers in developing countries in their efforts to achieve the desired objectives of taxation.                   

Solutions

Expert Solution

A)

Cost plus approach  

With the Cost Plus Method, we focus on the costs of a supplier of property or services in a controlled transaction. Once we know the costs, we add a mark-up. That mark-up should reflects the profit for the associated enterprise on the basis of functions and risks performed. The result is an arms’ length price.

In general, the mark-up in a cost plus method will be computed after direct and indirect costs of production or supply. However, operating expenses of the enterprise such as overhead expenses are not part of the mark up.

The mark-up can be determined in two ways. The first, it can be compared to the mark-up applied by the associated supplier of property or services for comparable transactions with third parties (internal cost-plus method). If such transactions do not take place, the alternative is to look at the cost plus mark-up applied in transactions between third parties (external cost-plus method).

Profit split approach

Associated enterprises sometimes engage in transactions that are very interrelated. Therefore, they cannot be examined on a separate basis. For these types of transactions, associated enterprises normally agree to split the profits.

The Profit Split Method examines the terms and conditions of these types of controlled transactions by determining the division of profits that independent enterprises would have realized from engaging in those transactions.

Resale price approach

The Resale Price Method is also known as the “Resale Minus Method.”

As a starting position, it takes the price at which an associated enterprise sells a product to a third party. This price is called a “resale price.”

Then, the resale price is reduced with a gross margin (the “resale price margin”), determined by comparing gross margins in comparable uncontrolled transactions. After this, the costs associated with the purchase of the product, like custom duties, are deducted.

What is left, can be regarded as an arm’s length price for the controlled transaction between associated enterprises.

B)

1) Increasing Tax Effort

Taxes matter. Not only are they necessary to pay for public services but people talk

about them, complain about them, and try to dodge them when they can. How people react in

turn affects the level and structure of taxation.

2) Assessing Tax Performance

International observers (and aid agencies) frequently ask for assessments of the tax

performance of developing countries. As a rule, what those who ask for such things seem to be

looking for are indicators of performance and output that are comparable over time and across

countries and are preferably simple and quantifiable. With respect to tax ratios, for example, the

aim is usually to provide a basis for assessing which countries are making a real effort to

improve and which are not. If a reliable standard of the level of performance that should be

expected from countries at various stages of development can be established, then the actual

performance of a country, its "effort", may be assessed in terms of how closely it approaches the

standard.

3) Improving Tax Administration

Reaping revenues from tax rate changes (in any direction) requires that tax administration

is effective to at least some extent. Raising revenues through base expansion requires even better

tax administration,. New taxpayers must be identified and brought into the tax net and new

collection techniques developed. Such changes take time to implement. The best tax policy in

the world is worth little if it cannot be implemented effectively. Tax policy design must take into

account the administrative dimension of taxation (McLaren 2003). What can be done to a

considerable extent inevitably determines what is done.

4) Lowering Tax Rates

As noted earlier, the challenge for many developing countries is not so much whether to

increase revenues but rather how to do so. Essentially, there are only three possibilities: raise

rates, expand bases, and improve administration. Raising rates within the existing system is the

most obvious approach, and it is often also the most politically acceptable approach. On the

other hand, it is generally the least economically desirable solution. Raising rates when

traditional tax bases are not expanding, new bases can shift abroad, and administration is weak is

unlikely to increase revenue much.

5) Broadening Tax Bases

No one likes taxes. People do not like to pay them. Governments do not like to impose

them. Unfortunately, taxes are necessary both to finance desired public spending in a non-

inflationary way and to ensure that the burden of paying for such spending is fairly distributed.

Since even necessary taxes impose real costs on society, good tax policy seeks to minimize those

costs. However, tax policy is not just about economics but also reflects such political factors as

the degree of concern about fairness.

6) Assessing Tax Performance

International observers (and aid agencies) frequently ask for assessments of the tax

performance of developing countries. As a rule, what those who ask for such things seem to be

looking for are indicators of performance and output that are comparable over time and across

countries and are preferably simple and quantifiable. With respect to tax ratios, for example, the

aim is usually to provide a basis for assessing which countries are making a real effort to

improve and which are not. If a reliable standard of the level of performance that should be

expected from countries at various stages of development can be established, then the actual

performance of a country, its "effort", may be assessed in terms of how closely it approaches the

standard


Related Solutions

1.) Discuss the valuation rules for estate and gift tax purposes. 2.) Describe how to value...
1.) Discuss the valuation rules for estate and gift tax purposes. 2.) Describe how to value family limited partnerships for estate and gift tax purposes. 3.) What does the valuation analyst need to consider in this type of assignment?
Describe how goodwill amortized for tax purposes for not for book purposes (i.e. no impairment) leads...
Describe how goodwill amortized for tax purposes for not for book purposes (i.e. no impairment) leads to temporary book-tax differences? Why does Congress provide the dividends received deduction for corporations receiving dividends?
Indicate if the following events or transactions are adjusting or nonadjusting items. ll they are adjusting...
Indicate if the following events or transactions are adjusting or nonadjusting items. ll they are adjusting items discuss the effect on the financial statements. Year-end was 31 December x4 and the accounts were authorised for issue on 15 March x5. (a) Entity makes a provision for doubtful debts of lolo and the amount provided for at the end of 3l December x4 was RM500,000. On 15 January, a debtor who owed the entity RM2 million became insolvent. (b) Closing inventory...
Make adjusting entries for December 31, 2017 for the following transactions. (Assume a single adjusting entry...
Make adjusting entries for December 31, 2017 for the following transactions. (Assume a single adjusting entry is made each of the following at year end December 31, 2017). A XX Company purchased a fire insurance policy for 2 years coverage on November 1, 2017 for $20000. B XX Company received $30000 from YY Company on January 1, 2017 in payment in advance for advising services to be provided for 2 years from the inception of the contract. C XX purchases...
7 Make adjusting entries for December 31, 2019 for the following transactions. (Assume a single adjusting...
7 Make adjusting entries for December 31, 2019 for the following transactions. (Assume a single adjusting entry is made each of the following at year end December 31, 2019). A Ajax Company purchased a fire insurance policy for 2 years coverage on November 1, 2019 for $24,000. B Ajax Company received $24,000 from Sphere Company on January 1, 2019 in payment in advance for financial analytical services to be provided for 2 years from the inception of the contract. C...
Some items are treated differently for accounting purposes than they are for tax purposes. For the following item: Es
Some items are treated differently for accounting purposes than they are for tax purposes. For the following item: Estimated future warranty costs, indicate whether it is considered a permanent difference or a temporary difference. For a temporary difference, indicate whether it will create a deferred tax asset or a deferred tax liability.  
A machine is classified as a ten-year MACRS property. Compute the book value for tax purposes...
A machine is classified as a ten-year MACRS property. Compute the book value for tax purposes at the end of five years. The cost basis is $225,000.
Ayayai Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes....
Ayayai Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes. (Assume the carryback provision is used for a net operating loss.) Year Pretax Income (Loss) Tax Rate 2015 123,000 34% 2016 86,000 34% 2017 (278,000) 38% 2018 237,000 38% Prepare the journal entries for the years 2015–2018 to record income tax expense (benefit) and income taxes payable (refundable) and the tax effects of the loss carryback and carryforward, assuming that at the end of...
Tamarisk Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes....
Tamarisk Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes. Year Pretax Income (Loss) Tax Rate 2018 $128,000 17 % 2019 118,000 17 % 2020 (290,000) 19 % 2021 306,000 19 % The tax rates listed were all enacted by the beginning of 2018. a) Prepare the journal entries for the years 2018–2021 to record income tax expense (benefit) and income taxes payable (refundable) and the tax effects of the loss carryforward, assuming that...
Splish Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes....
Splish Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes. Year Pretax Income (Loss) Tax Rate 2018 $125,000 17 % 2019 95,000 17 % 2020 (230,000 19 % 2021 301,000 19 % The tax rates listed were all enacted by the beginning of 2018. 1. Prepare the journal entries for the years 2018–2021 to record income tax expense (benefit) and income taxes payable (refundable) and the tax effects of the loss carryforward, assuming that...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT