Question

In: Accounting

When a plaintiff is suing a defendant, the defendant may raise an affirmative defense to relieve...

When a plaintiff is suing a defendant, the defendant may raise an affirmative defense to relieve it of liability or to reduce its liability. You have read Sports & Entertainment Law: Liability for Injuries under the Sports Exception Doctrine. After you read this page, answer the following questions.

What contact sports do you believe qualify under this "sports exception" doctrine for which proof of negligence is insufficient to establish liability for injuries sustained during the athletic contest? Is softball a contact sport for players? What about coaching or officiating decisions made in the middle of a fast-moving game?



How would you decide the case involving PGA golfer Walter Mallin and PGA golfer John Paesani?

Please answer the last part abd this is a business law discussion question.


Solutions

Expert Solution

As per the laws related to the sports , sports exception doctrine allows only such sports which may bring some kind of injury to the sports person which are not in the control of the game authority or the sports person itself. Some of them may also includes life risks too. Generally for participating in such sports, sports authority takes declaration forms from the players and the clauses there which are signed by the players protect them to establish liability for the injuries sustained during the sports.

Softball may be the contact sport for players but as there is no such life risks involved thus players agreed to play it without contacts also. Regarding the sports exclusions doctrine , same rules applies from the time of coaching that authority would not be held responsible anyhow for the injuries and or death occurred during the activity.


Related Solutions

Which of the following defense is not generally used when a third party is suing the...
Which of the following defense is not generally used when a third party is suing the auditors? Select one: a. Contributory negligence b. Non-negligent performance c. Absence of causal connection d. Lack of duty to perform service
most of the burden of affirmative proof is on the defendant under common law
most of the burden of affirmative proof is on the defendant under common law
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city forinjuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street-sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back pay....
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (1) The present value of two years’ back...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street-sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back pay....
ou are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
ou are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street-sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back pay....
You are serving on a jury which began in January 2020. A plaintiff is suing the...
You are serving on a jury which began in January 2020. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after falling down an uncovered manhole in 2018. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be 5 years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You and your co-jurors propose that the plaintiff receives the following judgement: 1-) 2 years of back pay ($54,000 in 12/2018, $62,000...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after falling down an uncovered manhole. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be 5 years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreman of the jury and propose that the jury gives the plaintiff an award to cover the following items: (1) The present value of two years...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street-sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back pay....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT