In: Accounting
Calisto Launch Services is an independent space corporation and
has been contracted to develop and launch one of two different
satellites. Initial equipment will cost $710 thousand for the first
satellite and $800 thousand for the second. Development will take 5
years at an expected cost of $100 thousand per year for the first
satellite; $170 thousand per year for the second. The same launch
vehicle can be used for either satellite and will cost $245
thousand at the time of the launch 5 years from now. At the
conclusion of the launch, the contracting company will pay Calisto
$2.3 million for either satellite.
Calisto is also considering whether they should launch both
satellites. Because Calisto would have to upgrade its facilities to
handle two concurrent projects, the initial costs would rise by
$150 thousand in addition to the first costs of each satellite.
Calisto would need to hire additional engineers and workers,
raising the yearly costs to a total of $420 thousand. An additional
compartment would be added to the launch vehicle at an additional
cost of $45 thousand. As an incentive to do both, the contracting
company will pay for both launches plus a bonus of $0.95 million.
Using a future worth analysis (FW) with a MARR of 7.00
percent/year, what should Calisto Launch Services do?
1) What is the future worth of the first satellite?
2) What is the future worth of the second satellite?
3) What is the future worth of both satellites?
4) Which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future
worth analysis?
a) Launch satellite one
b) Launch satellite two
c) Launch both satellites
d) Not Launch at all
First Satelite | Second Satelite | Both satelite | ||||||||||
Nature of transaction | Year | Cash flow | PVIF@7% | present worth | Cash flow | PVIF@7% | present worth | Cash flow | PVIF@7% | present worth | ||
Initial cost | 0 | -710000 | 1 | -710000 | -800000 | 1 | -800000 | -1660000 | 1 | -1660000 | ||
Development cost | 1 | -100000 | 0.934579 | -93458 | -170000 | 0.934579 | -158879 | -420000 | 0.934579 | -392523 | ||
Development cost | 2 | -100000 | 0.873439 | -87344 | -170000 | 0.873439 | -148485 | -420000 | 0.873439 | -366844 | ||
Development cost | 3 | -100000 | 0.816298 | -81630 | -170000 | 0.816298 | -138771 | -420000 | 0.816298 | -342845 | ||
Development cost | 4 | -100000 | 0.762895 | -76290 | -170000 | 0.762895 | -129692 | -420000 | 0.762895 | -320416 | ||
Development cost | 5 | -100000 | 0.712986 | -71299 | -170000 | 0.712986 | -121208 | -420000 | 0.712986 | -299454 | ||
Cost of Launch | 5 | -245000 | 0.712986 | -174682 | -245000 | 0.712986 | -174682 | -290000 | 0.712986 | -206766 | ||
Revenue from launching satelite/s | 5 | 2300000 | 0.712986 | 1639868 | 2300000 | 0.712986 | 1639868 | 5550000 | 0.712986 | 3957073 | ||
Present worth of each option(PW) | 345167 | -31847 | 368224 | |||||||||
Future worth of each option=PW*1.402552 | 484114 | -44667 | 516454 | |||||||||
Requirement 1 | Requirement 2 | Requirement 3 | ||||||||||
Requirement 4 | ||||||||||||
On the basis of future worth analysis, its alternative c (Lauch both satelites) which should be selected | ||||||||||||
Future worth component can be found out as follows | ||||||||||||
Year | Component | |||||||||||
0 | 1 | |||||||||||
1 | 1.07 | |||||||||||
2 | 1.1449 | |||||||||||
3 | 1.225043 | |||||||||||
4 | 1.310796 | |||||||||||
5 | 1.402552 |