In: Accounting
Calisto Launch Services is an independent space corporation and
has been contracted to develop and launch one of two different
satellites. Initial equipment will cost $750 thousand for the first
satellite and $800 thousand for the second. Development will take 5
years at an expected cost of $170 thousand per year for the first
satellite, $140 thousand per year for the second. The same launch
vehicle can be used for either satellite and will cost $215
thousand at the time of the launch 5 years from now. At the
conclusion of the launch, the contracting company will pay Calisto
$2.1 millon for either satellite.
Calisto is also considering launching both satellites. Because
Calisto would have to upgrade its facilities to handle two
concurrent projects, the initial costs would rise by $150 thousand
in addition to the first costs of each satellite. Calisto would
need to hire additional engineers and workers, raising the yearly
costs to a total of $350 thousand. An extra compartment would be
added to the launch vehicle at an additional cost of $75 thousand.
As an incentive to do both, the contracting company will pay for
both launches plus a bonus of $1.2 million. Using an internal rate
of return analysis with a MARR of 7%/year, what should Calisto
Launch Services do?
Which of the following lists indicate the proper alternatives for this problem:
1) First satellite only, second satellite only
2) First satellite only, second satellite only, both satellites
3) First satellite only, second satellite only, both satellites, neither satellite
4) First satellite only or second satellite only or neither satellite
3) Indicates the proper alternatives for this problem.
As can be seen from the following working, launching both the satellites only will be profitable for Calistro Launch Services. Either of the satellies separately will be giving negatve NPVs , among them Satellite 1 launch will result in higher losses compared to launch of Satellite 2.
Working:
Satellite 1. | |||
0 | 1-5 | 5 | |
Initial cost | -750000 | ||
Annual cost | -170000 | ||
Lanuch Cost | -215000 | ||
Contract Price | 2100000 | ||
Net Cash Flow | -750000 | -170000 | 1885000 |
MARR | 7% | 7% | 7% |
PV Factor | 1 | 4.1002 | 0.713 |
Present Value | -750000 | -697034 | 1344005 |
NPV | -103029 | ||
Satellite 2 | |||
0 | 1-5 | 5 | |
Initial cost | -800000 | ||
Annual cost | -140000 | ||
Lanuch Cost | -215000 | ||
Contract Price | 2100000 | ||
Net Cash Flow | -800000 | -140000 | 1885000 |
MARR | 7% | 7% | 7% |
PV Factor | 1 | 4.1002 | 0.713 |
Present Value | -800000 | -574028 | 1344005 |
NPV | -30023 | ||
Satellite 1 & 2 | |||
0 | 1-5 | 5 | |
Initial cost | -1550000 | ||
Annual cost | -310000 | ||
Lanuch Cost | -215000 | ||
Contract Price | 5400000 | ||
Net Cash Flow | -1550000 | -310000 | 5185000 |
MARR | 7% | 7% | 7% |
PV Factor | 1 | 4.1002 | 0.713 |
Present Value | -1550000 | -1271062 | 3696905 |
NPV | 875843 |