Question

NO COPIED ANSWER, I WILL UPVOTE

Research right-to-work laws nationally, in California, and Wisconsin. Give a brief synopsis of the laws in those 3 areas. Does support of these laws seem to be increasing or decreasing? What has the been their effect in CA on labor and on business? Explain.

Answer 1

Right to work laws is the las that stop union security agreement between the labor union and employers. According to these laws, unionized employees are not allowed for negotiating a contract that needs all benefitted members to give costs of union representation.

Nationally: the federal government controls and governs the open shop rule across the nation. However, right or work law is determines by the prominent job situs employee.

In California: In California, Right-to-work law is not available. "Paycheck protection" was proposed in 2012. It was very similar to the right-to-work laws and was defeated when included in the general election ballot.

In Wisconsin: In 2015, Wisconsin ACt 1 was passed which started right to work laws in Wisconsin. Under this act, an employee working under the private sector cannot join a labor union with an agreement. It needs workers in collective bargaining unit to voms a labor organization member as an employment condition.

Support of these laws is increasing in the united states because in the past two decades 7 states have either adopted or joined the right to work laws.
List of these states is as follows;

• Alabama  (Constitution 2016, adopted 1953)
• Indiana (adopted 2012)
• Kentucky (adopted 2017)
• Michigan (adopted 2012)
• Oklahoma (Constitution, adopted 2001)
• West Virginia (adopted 2016)
• Wisconsin (adopted 2015)

Since there is no right to work law in CA or California. Therefore, It has no effect on labor and business in California. "Paycheck protection" was proposed in 2012. It was very similar to the right-to-work laws and was defeated when included in the general election ballot.