In: Economics
1 The social cost of pollution
Steel production is a dirty business.It is a significant contributor to local air quality problems,
and it accounts for roughly 5% of greenhouse gas emissions globally. Two tons of carbon dioxide
are emitted for each single ton of steel produced. Despite efforts to innovate, there is no viable
technology for reducing the emissions intensity of steel production; the only way to reduce carbon
pollution in this industry is to reduce steel production.
Imagine that the steel market is characterized as follows
Marginal costs:MC(Q) = 1.25Q
Marginal benefits:MB(Q) = 27−Q
Marginal damages:MD(Q) = 0.25Q
(A) Draw a graph containing MC(Q),MB(Q), and, SMC(Q) =MC(Q) +(Q). Concisely
describe what each of these functions measure in the context of steel production and con-
sumption. [3 points]
Imagine that this market is perfectly competitive. Equilibrium steel production is then defined by
MC(Q∗) =MB(Q*).
(B) So what actually happens in this market, in equilibrium? I.e., what is (Q∗, P∗)? [2 points]
(C) Label (on a graph) and calculate the consumer surplus (CS), producer surplus (PS), and total
damages (TD). [3 points]
(D) What quantity (Q∗∗) maximizes total net benefits in this market? How do you know? Calcu-
late the deadweight loss in the market without any government intervention (i.e., (Q∗, P∗)).
[2 points]
(E) Explain how incentives in the free (i.e., no-intervention) market cause a deviation from the
outcome that would have maximized total net benefits. [2 points]
(F) Holding constant (P∗, Q∗), how would you expect Q∗∗to change if: (a) demand were more
inelastic; (b) marginal damages were larger? [2 points]
U.S. demand for steel is met by both domestic supply (≈70%) and imports (≈30%). The Trump
Administration implemented a tariff on all steel imports beginning in June of last year, with the
goal of supporting the domestic steel industry. One effect of this policy change was a higher price
of steel in the U.S. Imagine, for simplicity, that this price change was realized through an upward
shift in the marginal cost curve
MC1(Q) = 1.25Q+ 2.25
(G) Calculate the change in total damages caused by this shift in the marginal cost curve. [2
points]
(H) What percentage of the total lost surplus (CS+PS) from this change comes from a reduction
in consumer surplus? [2 points]
(I) Compare (in terms of magnitude) the ratio of the lost surpluses (∆CS/∆PS) to (the absolute value of) the ratio of the slopes (slopeD/slopeS)). [2 points]
A)
MB curve shows Marginal benefits, consumer are getting from consumption of steel.
MC curve shows Marginal cost of production for producers of production of steel.
MD curve shows Marginal damage cost that society has to bear for production of steel.
SMC curve shows aggregate marginal cost to society of production of the steel which is equal to MC + MD.
b)the competitive market equilibrium will be at where ,MB=MC{ ignoring MDC}
MB=27-Q
MC=1.25Q
MB=MC
27-Q=1.25Q
25=2.25Q
Q=27/2.25
Q* =12
P*/MB=27-Q=27-12=15
C)
CS=area of CS triangle=1/2*12*(27-15)=1/2*12*12=72
PS =area of PS triangle=1/2*12*(15-0)=1/2*12*12=72
MDC=0.25Q
TDC=0.125*Q^2{ using integration}
TDC=0.125*12*12=0.125*144=18
D) QUANTITY that will maximize net benefit is that,where SMC=MB
1.5Q=27-Q
2.5Q=27
Q**=10.8
Marginal damage cost at Q*=0.25Q=0.25*12=3
Difference between Q* and Q**=12-10.8=1.2
Deadweight loss=1/2*3*1.2=1.8