Question

In: Accounting

You are a recently appointed audit partner in a large independent firm of accountants. You are...

You are a recently appointed audit partner in a large independent firm of accountants. You are delighted that you are now a partner and can’t wait to sign off your first set of accounts. Your firm recently won an audit tender for a medium-sized family owned company, A Ltd, and the firm’s managing partner has allocated the client to you. The managing partner is reasonably close to the family which owns A Ltd and you believe that this is at least part of the reason why the company decided to appoint your firm.

As is normal, you go through all the firm’s new client procedures which include writing to the previous auditors and also obtaining sets of statutory accounts for the previous 3 years. When you receive the written reply from the previous auditors, you note that they have nothing to report other than any matters addressed in their audit report. This seems strange, so you quickly review the company’s set of financial statements for the previous year and note that the company’s audit report was qualified on the basis of non-compliance with an accounting standard. The audit report highlights that the company owns a property and advises that the directors, on cost grounds, decided not to have an FRS 16 valuation performed. The audit opinion adds that the auditor is unable to quantify the impact of this non-compliance with FRS 16. You wish that you had access to the working papers of the predecessor auditors but the relevant audit regulation was not applicable at this time.

You are considering the impact of this issue when Mr X, the Managing Partner, comes into your office. He provides you with an oral briefing on A Ltd and then asks you whether you have any queries. You inform Mr X what you have found. Mr X replies: “I do not see any problems; if the client does not believe that it is worth paying for this information then who are we to tell them otherwise: it is a family business after all. If we have to, we can adopt the same approach as the previous auditors and qualify the audit report on the same grounds.”

That is when you inform him that you have doubts as to whether the audit qualification issued was appropriate in the circumstances. The previous auditors issued an “except for – disagreement with accounting treatment – due to noncompliance with an accounting standard” and you believe that a “limitation of scope” opinion may have been more appropriate. You are not sure but you surmise that this may be because of the requirement that if a client places a limitation of scope on the work of the auditors which will require the auditor to issue a disclaimer of opinion, in advance of the auditors accepting that appointment, then unless the restriction is removed, the auditor should not continue in office for that particular client. Mr X replies that you should go ahead and reassess the position once the audit fieldwork has been completed by your team.

However, he adds: “Bear in mind that although the Managing Director (MD), is an acquaintance it has taken me a number of years to get him to use our firm as auditors – I do not want to do anything that would upset him unnecessarily and jeopardise our business relationship.”

You are now reviewing the audit files of A Ltd for the year in question. The company has a turnover of around $18 million and is showing a profit of$2,900,000 for the year after taking account of the proposed audit adjustments. However, you notice that the directors have once again refused to obtain an FRS 16 valuation and therefore no gain or loss on revaluation is reflected in the accounts. You realise that the lack of an FRS 16 valuation will mean that you will have to qualify your first audit opinion. Whilst this concerns you, what really worries you is the type of qualification that will be required i.e. a limitation of scope. If the extent of this limitation leads you to issue a disclaimer of opinion, then your firm would not be able to act for this client going forward unless the client changes its stance on obtaining FRS 16 valuations. Mr X will be furious if you adopt this approach.

1- What fundamental ethical principles for accountants are most applicable and is there an apparent conflict between them?

2- Is there a conflict between the ‘Guardian’ and ‘Commercial’ strands of an accountant’s responsibilities?

3- If the audit client refuse to change his accounting treatment, what is the most appropriate audit opinion will be given?

Source: This case study was published by the Technical Policy Board of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and adapted by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Singapore (ICPAS) with the permission of ICAS.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Question 1. A. You are the audit partner of Simon & Co. a large audit firm...
Question 1. A. You are the audit partner of Simon & Co. a large audit firm that is operating in Melbourne. your firm audited ABC Ltd. a custom -made products manufacturing company. ABC ltd declared bankruptcy within six months of receiving an unqualified auditor's opinion on its financial statements for the year ended 21 December 2018. The XYZ bank initiated a court challenge against your firm on the grounds that the bank disbursed a "2500000 loan to ABC Ltd in...
You are a newly appointed partner in the audit firm where you have been working from...
You are a newly appointed partner in the audit firm where you have been working from the past ten years. This year, the audit firm was engaged to audit the year-end accounts and tax returns of Younous Company, a relatively new company located in Nizwa. Younous Company is engaged in online shopping business that sells all sorts of women products – clothes, shoes, make-up and accessories. They also design and produce their own clothes line but outsource the other products...
You are the senior technical partner in a large firm of accountants. You have been asked...
You are the senior technical partner in a large firm of accountants. You have been asked to advise the relevant audit partners on the form of auditors’ report that they should give in each of the following clients: Company A suffered a fire in an office which housed the inventory records including the inventory count conducted at the year-end. The audit team were planning to visit to inspect the inventory shortly after the year-end but the loss of the records...
You are the senior technical partner in a large firm of accountants. You have been asked...
You are the senior technical partner in a large firm of accountants. You have been asked to advise the relevant audit partners on the form of auditors’ report that they should give in each of the following clients: Company A suffered a fire in an office which housed the inventory records including the inventory count conducted at the year-end. The audit team were planning to visit to inspect the inventory shortly after the year-end but the loss of the records...
Connie is the recently appointed engagement partner of the audit of Camel Inc. Connie has just...
Connie is the recently appointed engagement partner of the audit of Camel Inc. Connie has just taken over the audit from Mathew Pate, a partner who will be retiring soon. Mathew had a small portfolio of clients and completed most substantive testing for Camel at year-end. Connie is unable to do this because she is facing difficulties with two of her other large clients. These clients have just been advised that their financing arrangements with banks may not be renewed,...
You are the audit partner of Integrity Chartered Accountants (“ICA”), working on the audit of Darwin...
You are the audit partner of Integrity Chartered Accountants (“ICA”), working on the audit of Darwin Tourist Buses (“DTB”) for the 2019 financial year. DTB is a provider of luxury bus trips all around Australia, including both interstate capital city travel and conference and holiday packages. The net profit before tax of DTB for the 2019 financial year is $14.5M while net assets total $232M. You are reviewing the 2019 audit working papers and note that the assurance services senior...
You are an audit senior at Morton and Lowe Chartered Accountants LLP. The firm has recently...
You are an audit senior at Morton and Lowe Chartered Accountants LLP. The firm has recently begun to perform audits and has two partners, managers, senior and junior staff accountants respectively. Your firm has recently been approached by Don Cherry, the owner of Maple Leaf Construction, to be engaged in their upcoming audit. The company’s bank requires them to submit annual audited financial statements 60 days after year end. In addition to submitting the statements to the bank, the company...
You are the audit partner in each of the following independent and material scenarios. The audit...
You are the audit partner in each of the following independent and material scenarios. The audit client’s financing arrangements are about to expire, and the firm has not as yet been able to secure replacement financing. If they are unsuccessful in arranging replacement financing the client firm may have to consider filing for bankruptcy. After evaluating the audit client’s situation, you believe that the going concern assumption may no longer be appropriate. You have advised the client that they should...
George Larkham (George) works as an audit partner at a mid-tier firm of Chartered Accountants, and...
George Larkham (George) works as an audit partner at a mid-tier firm of Chartered Accountants, and is in the process of finalising the audit of the financial report of Rainbow Resources Limited (Rainbow Resources) for the year ended 31 December 2016. George has been approached by the company’s managing director with the proposal to process a journal entry to recognise an expense and a provision at 31 December 2016: Debit Credit Heavy maintenance expense 1,500,000 Provision for heavy maintenance expense...
You are the audit partner of the ABC audit firm, assigned to the audit of XYZ...
You are the audit partner of the ABC audit firm, assigned to the audit of XYZ Ltd. You issued an unmodified auditor's report for the year ended 30 June 2020. In December 2019, three employees of XYZ Ltd. were charged with systematically and deliberately entering fictitious transactions and embezzling about $9 million. ABC audit firm has been notified by the legal representatives of XYZ Ltd. that they are taking legal action against your firm based on the audit for the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT