In: Statistics and Probability
In a clinical trial, 25 out of 822 patients taking a
prescription drug daily complained of flulike symptoms. Suppose
that it is known that 2.7% of patients taking competing drugs
complain of flulike symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to
conclude that more than 2.7% of this drug's users experience
flulike symptoms as a side effect at the α=0.1 level of
significance?
Because np 0 ( 1- p 0) = ?
▼
<
>
=
≠
10, the sample size is
▼
greater thangreater than
less thanless than
5% of the population size, and the sample
▼
is given to be random,
cannot be reasonably assumed to be random,
can be reasonably assumed to be random,
is given to not be random,
the requirements for testing the hypothesis
▼
are
are not
satisfied.
Given that, n = 822 and x = 25
p0 = 0.027
np0(1-p0) = 822 * 0.027 * ( 1 - 0.027) = 21.5948
Because, np0(1-p0) = 21.6 greater than ( > )10, the sample size greater than 5% of the population size and the sample can be reasonably assumed to be random the requirements for testing the hypothesis are satisfied.
The null and the alternative hypotheses are,
H0 : p = 0.027 versus H1 : p > 0.027
Using TI-84 calculator we get,
Test statiatic is, Z0 = 0.60
p-value = 0.2730
Since, the p-value = 0.2730 > , do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence that more than 2.7% of the users experience flulike symptoms.