In: Statistics and Probability
In a clinical trial, 25 out of 888 patients taking a prescription drug daily complained of flulike symptoms. Suppose that it is known that 2.4% of patients taking competing drugs complain of flulike symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that more than 2.4% of this drug's users experience flulike symptoms as a side effect at the alpha equals 0.01 level of significance? Because np 0 left parenthesis 1 minus p 0 right parenthesisequals nothing ▼ greater than less than equals not equals 10, the sample size is ▼ greater than less than 5% of the population size, and the sample ▼ is given to be random, is given to not be random, cannot be reasonably assumed to be random, can be reasonably assumed to be random, the requirements for testing the hypothesis ▼ are are not satisfied. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? Upper H 0: ▼ p mu sigma ▼ less than greater than equals not equals nothing versus Upper H 1: ▼ p sigma mu ▼ not equals equals greater than less than nothing (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Find the test statistic, z 0. z 0equals nothing (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value. P-valueequals nothing (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Choose the correct conclusion below. A. Since P-valueless thanalpha, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence that more than 2.4% of the users experience flulike symptoms. B. Since P-valueless thanalpha, do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence that more than 2.4% of the users experience flulike symptoms. C. Since P-valuegreater thanalpha, do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence that more than 2.4% of the users experience flulike symptoms. D. Since P-valuegreater thanalpha, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence that more than 2.4% of the users experience flulike symptoms.
The following information is provided:
The sample size is N = 888
The number of favorable cases is X = 25
Sample Proportion p = 25/888 = 0.0282
Hypothesized Proportion p0 = 0.024
In this case, n*p0*(1-p0) = 888*0.024*(1-0.024) = 20.80 > 10
Because np0(1-p0) = 20.8 greater than 10, the sample size is greater than 5% of the population size , and the sample can be reasonably assumed to be random, the requirements for testing the hypothesis are satisfied
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
Ho: p ≤ 0.024 versus Ha: p > 0.024
Test Statistics
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
The test statistic, z0 = 0.81
The P-value corresponding to z0 = 0.81 for right tailed test is 0.209 (Obtained using online P Value from Z Score Calculator. Screenshot attached)
Since p-value (0.209) greater than α (0.01), we fail to reject null hypothesis. Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence to claim that more than 2.4% of the users experience flulike symptoms (Option C is correct).