In: Economics
| Chicken Sandwiches (CS) | |||||||||||||||||
| Qcs | |||||||||||||||||
| Store 1 | 
 Quantity of chicken sandwiches sold per day  | 
Price CS | Price H | 
 A = Advertising expenditures in thousands of dollars  | 
I = After tax Income per week | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 1000 | 3.59 | 3 | 20 | 280 | ||||||||||||
| 2 | 1100 | 3.39 | 2.89 | 16 | 280 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 1050 | 3.39 | 2.29 | 12 | 300 | ||||||||||||
| 4 | 2000 | 2.99 | 2.69 | 20 | 450 | ||||||||||||
| 5 | 2200 | 2.79 | 3 | 22 | 460 | ||||||||||||
| 6 | 2100 | 2.49 | 3 | 22 | 450 | ||||||||||||
| 7 | 1900 | 2.97 | 3 | 21 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| 8 | 1100 | 3.49 | 2.59 | 16 | 280 | ||||||||||||
| 9 | 870 | 3.79 | 2.39 | 16 | 260 | ||||||||||||
| 10 | 1650 | 2.79 | 2.79 | 17 | 370 | ||||||||||||
| 11 | 1420 | 2.99 | 2.69 | 24 | 330 | ||||||||||||
| 12 | 1930 | 2.79 | 3 | 26 | 400 | ||||||||||||
| 13 | 1228 | 3.19 | 2.59 | 22 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| 14 | 1675 | 2.97 | 2.89 | 24 | 270 | ||||||||||||
| 15 | 1300 | 3.09 | 2.79 | 14 | 280 | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 1422 | 3.49 | 2.89 | 15 | 350 | ||||||||||||
| 17 | 1877 | 2.99 | 3 | 22 | 360 | ||||||||||||
| 18 | 1943 | 2.99 | 3.09 | 20 | 370 | ||||||||||||
| 19 | 1622 | 3.19 | 3.49 | 21 | 350 | ||||||||||||
| 20 | 1273 | 3.29 | 2.59 | 15 | 330 | ||||||||||||
| 21 | 1064 | 3.59 | 2.49 | 13 | 330 | ||||||||||||
| 22 | 1467 | 3.29 | 2.69 | 22 | 360 | ||||||||||||
| 23 | 1598 | 3.19 | 2.9 | 18 | 360 | ||||||||||||
| 24 | 1743 | 2.99 | 3 | 21 | 400 | ||||||||||||
| 25 | 1289 | 3.2 | 2.79 | 25 | 360 | ||||||||||||
| 26 | 1345 | 3 | 2.99 | 27 | 300 | ||||||||||||
| 27 | 1987 | 2.79 | 3.09 | 29 | 380 | ||||||||||||
| 28 | 1356 | 3.09 | 2.79 | 23 | 350 | ||||||||||||
| 29 | 1098 | 3.19 | 2.49 | 20 | 330 | ||||||||||||
| 30 | 2436 | 2.49 | 3.29 | 16 | 430 | ||||||||||||
| 31 | 2875 | 2.29 | 2.69 | 28 | 460 | ||||||||||||
| 32 | 2134 | 2.9 | 2.79 | 18 | 400 | ||||||||||||
| 33 | 2579 | 2.69 | 3.49 | 28 | 410 | ||||||||||||
| 34 | 2098 | 2.76 | 3.39 | 22 | 430 | ||||||||||||
| 35 | 2468 | 2.59 | 3.49 | 25 | 460 | ||||||||||||
| 36 | 987 | 3.29 | 2.89 | 12 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| 37 | 1093 | 3.19 | 2.79 | 15 | 370 | ||||||||||||
| 38 | 2543 | 2.69 | 3.09 | 28 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| 39 | 3721 | 2.99 | 3.09 | 31 | 500 | ||||||||||||
| 40 | 3214 | 2.99 | 3 | 18 | 250 | ||||||||||||
| 41 | 2156 | 2.99 | 3.09 | 22 | 410 | ||||||||||||
| 42 | 445 | 2.69 | 2.69 | 25 | 450 | ||||||||||||
| 43 | 1324 | 3 | 2.69 | 16 | 300 | ||||||||||||
| 44 | 1654 | 3.09 | 2.89 | 18 | 340 | ||||||||||||
| 45 | 1789 | 2.99 | 2.99 | 19 | 360 | ||||||||||||
| 46 | 1357 | 3.09 | 2.59 | 14 | 350 | ||||||||||||
| 47 | 2146 | 2.99 | 3.09 | 26 | 390 | ||||||||||||
| 48 | 2183 | 2.59 | 3.29 | 20 | 380 | ||||||||||||
| 49 | 2265 | 2.39 | 3.19 | 21 | 400 | ||||||||||||
| 50 | 2343 | 2.89 | 3.09 | 23 | 410 | ||||||||||||
| 51 | 1904 | 2.99 | 3 | 20 | 370 | ||||||||||||
| 52 | 1752 | 2.79 | 2.89 | 19 | 310 | ||||||||||||
| 53 | 2354 | 3.09 | 3.19 | 26 | 400 | ||||||||||||
| 54 | 2876 | 2.69 | 3.09 | 29 | 410 | ||||||||||||
| 55 | 2169 | 2.89 | 3 | 21 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| 56 | 3052 | 2.59 | 2.89 | 31 | 440 | ||||||||||||
| 57 | 1654 | 3.29 | 2.69 | 17 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| averages | 1810.140351 | 3.00 | 2.92 | 20.89 | 362.98 | ||||||||||||
Problem Set
Week 2
100 Points
Question 1: Run a regression analysis using the data provided. If data analysis is not installed then follow these steps: (32 Points)
• Go to Data Analysis
• click on file, then options, then add-ins, then analysis tool pack scroll down to regression.
• Input y range - your dependent variable "quantity of chicken sandwiches"
• Input x range - your independent variables "Price CS, Price H, A, I)
• Select OK
• Write the equation interpret your results.
Instructions: Questions 2-18 are 4 points each.
Question 2: Are the goods substitutes or complements?
Question 3: Is there a positive or negative relationship between price of cs and Qcs? Is this relationshipsignificant?
Question 4: Is there a positive or negative relationship between price of H and Qcs? Is this relationship significant?
Question 5. Is there a positive or negative relationship between Advertising and Qcs? Is this relationship significant?
Question 6: Is there a positive or negative relationship between income and Qcs? Is this relationship significant?
Question 7: Which of the data points appear to be from a store located on a college campus? Explain.
Question 8: Which of the data points appear to be from a store located in a very competitive area? Explain.
Question 9: Which store appears to be in a high-income area?
Question 10: What is the average price of CS, price of Hamburgers, amount of advertising and weekly take home income?
Question 11: Plug in the average numbers into the regression equation.
Question 12: Estimate the change in chicken sandwiches if the price of the sandwich rises to $4.
Question 13: What would happen to Qcs if the advertising budget was increased by $2000? (or 2 since the numbers are in thousands)
Question 14: Solve for the price elasticity of demand. See page 82 and 83 of your textbook.
Question 15: Is the good elastic, inelastic or unit elastic?
Question 16: Solve for the income elasticity.
Question 17: Is the good a luxury, necessity or inferior product?
Question 18: Solve for the cross-price elasticity between hamburgers and chicken sandwiches
| SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||||
| Regression Statistics | ||||||||
| Multiple R | 0.741702076 | |||||||
| R Square | 0.55012197 | |||||||
| Adjusted R Square | 0.515515967 | |||||||
| Standard Error | 446.9473625 | |||||||
| Observations | 57 | |||||||
| ANOVA | ||||||||
| df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||||
| Regression | 4 | 12702239.75 | 3175559.936 | 15.89672116 | 1.46301E-08 | |||
| Residual | 52 | 10387621.13 | 199761.9448 | |||||
| Total | 56 | 23089860.88 | ||||||
| Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 95.0% | Upper 95.0% | |
| Intercept | 572.5975477 | 1549.674374 | 0.369495397 | 0.713258982 | -2537.051583 | 3682.246679 | -2537.051583 | 3682.246679 | 
| Price CS | -604.5746764 | 280.8597382 | -2.152585772 | 0.036012589 | -1168.160973 | -40.98838016 | -1168.160973 | -40.98838016 | 
| Price H | 645.1749975 | 275.3295182 | 2.343283066 | 0.022974221 | 92.68589944 | 1197.664096 | 92.68589944 | 1197.664096 | 
| A | 32.65949404 | 15.61168861 | 2.091989845 | 0.041339495 | 1.332348959 | 63.98663912 | 1.332348959 | 63.98663912 | 
| Income | 1.339313822 | 1.371717799 | 0.976377082 | 0.333398178 | -1.413239316 | 4.091866961 | -1.413239316 | 4.091866961 | 
The regression equation can be written as:
Qcs= 572.59-604.57Pcs+645.17Ph+32.66A+1.34I
About 74% of the variation in the quantity demand is explained by the variables chosen above as indicated by the value of R square.
2. The substitute goods are those when the increase in the price of one good increases the supply of other good or there is a direct relationship between the price of one good and quantity of other good. while the relationship gets reverse in case of complement goods. here the coefficient of Price H is positive which means that for every one unit increase in the price of H would cause a 645 point increase in the quantity of CS. since this is a positive or direct relationship thus these goods are substitutes.
3. The coefficient of Pcs is negative (-604.57), thus there is a negative relationship between the price of CS and quantity demanded of CS. However, if we look at the p-value which is 0.036 and less than 0.05, it implies that the coefficient is significant at a 5% significance level.
4. The coefficient of Ph is positive (645.17), thus there is a positive relationship between the price of H and quantity demanded of CS. However, if we look at the p-value which is 0.023 and less than 0.05, it implies that the coefficient is significant at a 5% significance level.
5. The coefficient of A is positive (32.66), thus there is a positive relationship between the Advertising and the quantity demanded of CS. However, if we look at the p-value which is 0.041 and less than 0.05, it implies that the coefficient is significant at a 5% significance level.
6. The coefficient of I is also positive (1.34), thus there is a positive relationship between the income and the quantity demanded of CS. However, if we look at the p-value which is 0.33, it implies that the coefficient is significant at a 5% significance level.